The Dark Duo of Post-Colonial Ideology: A Model of Symbolic Exclusion and Historical Negation

Post-colonial nations experience a specific set of socio-structural conditions that foster a unique duo of ideologies. These are the ideology of Historical Recognition versus Negation (or HRN) and the ideology of Symbolic Projection versus Exclusion (or SPE). These ideologies operate in tandem to le...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chris G. Sibley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bielefeld 2010-04-01
Series:International Journal of Conflict and Violence
Online Access:https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2818
id doaj-ca648fb9201347379466b099b43b5e49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca648fb9201347379466b099b43b5e492020-11-25T02:38:44ZengUniversity of BielefeldInternational Journal of Conflict and Violence1864-13852010-04-014110.4119/ijcv-2818The Dark Duo of Post-Colonial Ideology: A Model of Symbolic Exclusion and Historical NegationChris G. Sibley0University of AucklandPost-colonial nations experience a specific set of socio-structural conditions that foster a unique duo of ideologies. These are the ideology of Historical Recognition versus Negation (or HRN) and the ideology of Symbolic Projection versus Exclusion (or SPE). These ideologies operate in tandem to legitimize material and symbolic inequality in response to specific and contested aspects of post-colonial social structure and history. HRN is promoted by the dominant group to legitimize inequality in outcomes experienced by Indigenous peoples in post-colonial societies where historical injustice is objective fact (objective historical injustice). SPE is promoted by the dominant group to claim ownership of the national category in post-colonial societies where there is an inability to logically deny that Indigenous peoples "belong" to the nation (undeniable belongingness). I present the Post-Colonial Ideology Scale (PCIS-2D), which assesses these two distinct "dark" ideologies. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses validated the factor structure of the PCIS-2D in undergraduate (N = 373; Study 1) and community (N = 447; Study 2) samples of New Zealand (NZ) citizens. The PCIS-2D evidenced good construct validity, as SPE and HRN predicted unique variance in voting preferences and social policy attitudes controlling for demographics, Big Five personality, and System Justification ideology (Study 2). These results indicate that HRN and SPE are distinct ideologies that explain unique variance in support for a range of social and political issues. At the systemic level, HRN and SPE form a joint ideological system that legitimates inequality in two critical social domains: one relating to resource allocations, the other relating to representation and ownership of the national category.https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2818
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chris G. Sibley
spellingShingle Chris G. Sibley
The Dark Duo of Post-Colonial Ideology: A Model of Symbolic Exclusion and Historical Negation
International Journal of Conflict and Violence
author_facet Chris G. Sibley
author_sort Chris G. Sibley
title The Dark Duo of Post-Colonial Ideology: A Model of Symbolic Exclusion and Historical Negation
title_short The Dark Duo of Post-Colonial Ideology: A Model of Symbolic Exclusion and Historical Negation
title_full The Dark Duo of Post-Colonial Ideology: A Model of Symbolic Exclusion and Historical Negation
title_fullStr The Dark Duo of Post-Colonial Ideology: A Model of Symbolic Exclusion and Historical Negation
title_full_unstemmed The Dark Duo of Post-Colonial Ideology: A Model of Symbolic Exclusion and Historical Negation
title_sort dark duo of post-colonial ideology: a model of symbolic exclusion and historical negation
publisher University of Bielefeld
series International Journal of Conflict and Violence
issn 1864-1385
publishDate 2010-04-01
description Post-colonial nations experience a specific set of socio-structural conditions that foster a unique duo of ideologies. These are the ideology of Historical Recognition versus Negation (or HRN) and the ideology of Symbolic Projection versus Exclusion (or SPE). These ideologies operate in tandem to legitimize material and symbolic inequality in response to specific and contested aspects of post-colonial social structure and history. HRN is promoted by the dominant group to legitimize inequality in outcomes experienced by Indigenous peoples in post-colonial societies where historical injustice is objective fact (objective historical injustice). SPE is promoted by the dominant group to claim ownership of the national category in post-colonial societies where there is an inability to logically deny that Indigenous peoples "belong" to the nation (undeniable belongingness). I present the Post-Colonial Ideology Scale (PCIS-2D), which assesses these two distinct "dark" ideologies. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses validated the factor structure of the PCIS-2D in undergraduate (N = 373; Study 1) and community (N = 447; Study 2) samples of New Zealand (NZ) citizens. The PCIS-2D evidenced good construct validity, as SPE and HRN predicted unique variance in voting preferences and social policy attitudes controlling for demographics, Big Five personality, and System Justification ideology (Study 2). These results indicate that HRN and SPE are distinct ideologies that explain unique variance in support for a range of social and political issues. At the systemic level, HRN and SPE form a joint ideological system that legitimates inequality in two critical social domains: one relating to resource allocations, the other relating to representation and ownership of the national category.
url https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2818
work_keys_str_mv AT chrisgsibley thedarkduoofpostcolonialideologyamodelofsymbolicexclusionandhistoricalnegation
AT chrisgsibley darkduoofpostcolonialideologyamodelofsymbolicexclusionandhistoricalnegation
_version_ 1724789905074159616