A Review of Contact Lens Dropout

Andrew D Pucker,1 Anna A Tichenor2 1School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; 2School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USACorrespondence: Andrew D PuckerSchool of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1716 University Blvd, Birmingham,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pucker AD, Tichenor AA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2020-06-01
Series:Clinical Optometry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/a-review-of-contact-lens-dropout-peer-reviewed-article-OPTO
id doaj-ca3fb4d0b1124f2a8438ec1e6636845e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca3fb4d0b1124f2a8438ec1e6636845e2020-11-25T03:29:05ZengDove Medical PressClinical Optometry1179-27522020-06-01Volume 12859454807A Review of Contact Lens DropoutPucker ADTichenor AAAndrew D Pucker,1 Anna A Tichenor2 1School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; 2School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USACorrespondence: Andrew D PuckerSchool of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1716 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35233, USATel +1 920 579-2900Email apucker@uab.eduPurpose: Contact lens (CL) dropout is likely a major factor contributing to the near stagnant growth in the CL market. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge related to the frequency of CL dropout and the factors associated with it.Methods: PubMed.gov was searched on or before March 22, 2020, with the terms “contact lens” with “dropout” or “cessation” or “disruption” or “discomfort”. Pertinent articles were collected. The references from these articles were likewise searched to identify additional relevant articles. Only manuscripts written in English were included. No study design or date exclusions were imposed on this review.Results: This literature review found that CL dropout was frequent across developed countries, with a CL dropout frequency that ranged between 12.0% and 27.4% (pooled mean = 21.7%). The top cited reason for CL dropout in established CL wearers was discomfort, while vision was the top reason in neophyte CL wearers. If given the chance, CL dropouts are often able to successfully resume CL wear up to 74% of the time. While the literature is mixed with regard to factors promoting CL dropout, meibomian gland dysfunction appears to promote CL dropout.Conclusion: CL dropout is a frequently encountered condition that may be curtailed by early detection, patient education, alterative CL options, or early treatment of underlying ocular surface diseases such as meibomian gland dysfunction.Keywords: contact lens dropout, contact lens cessation, contact lens dry eye, ocular surfacehttps://www.dovepress.com/a-review-of-contact-lens-dropout-peer-reviewed-article-OPTOcontact lens dropoutcontact lens cessationcontact lens dry eyeocular surface
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pucker AD
Tichenor AA
spellingShingle Pucker AD
Tichenor AA
A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
Clinical Optometry
contact lens dropout
contact lens cessation
contact lens dry eye
ocular surface
author_facet Pucker AD
Tichenor AA
author_sort Pucker AD
title A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
title_short A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
title_full A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
title_fullStr A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
title_sort review of contact lens dropout
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Optometry
issn 1179-2752
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Andrew D Pucker,1 Anna A Tichenor2 1School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; 2School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USACorrespondence: Andrew D PuckerSchool of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1716 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35233, USATel +1 920 579-2900Email apucker@uab.eduPurpose: Contact lens (CL) dropout is likely a major factor contributing to the near stagnant growth in the CL market. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge related to the frequency of CL dropout and the factors associated with it.Methods: PubMed.gov was searched on or before March 22, 2020, with the terms “contact lens” with “dropout” or “cessation” or “disruption” or “discomfort”. Pertinent articles were collected. The references from these articles were likewise searched to identify additional relevant articles. Only manuscripts written in English were included. No study design or date exclusions were imposed on this review.Results: This literature review found that CL dropout was frequent across developed countries, with a CL dropout frequency that ranged between 12.0% and 27.4% (pooled mean = 21.7%). The top cited reason for CL dropout in established CL wearers was discomfort, while vision was the top reason in neophyte CL wearers. If given the chance, CL dropouts are often able to successfully resume CL wear up to 74% of the time. While the literature is mixed with regard to factors promoting CL dropout, meibomian gland dysfunction appears to promote CL dropout.Conclusion: CL dropout is a frequently encountered condition that may be curtailed by early detection, patient education, alterative CL options, or early treatment of underlying ocular surface diseases such as meibomian gland dysfunction.Keywords: contact lens dropout, contact lens cessation, contact lens dry eye, ocular surface
topic contact lens dropout
contact lens cessation
contact lens dry eye
ocular surface
url https://www.dovepress.com/a-review-of-contact-lens-dropout-peer-reviewed-article-OPTO
work_keys_str_mv AT puckerad areviewofcontactlensdropout
AT tichenoraa areviewofcontactlensdropout
AT puckerad reviewofcontactlensdropout
AT tichenoraa reviewofcontactlensdropout
_version_ 1724580801739227136