Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method.

The analysis of MET gene copy number (CN) has been considered to be a potential biomarker to predict the response to MET-targeted therapies in various cancers. However, the current standard methods to determine MET CN are SNP 6.0 in the genomic DNA of cancer cell lines and fluorescence in situ hybri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanni Zhang, En-Tzu Tang, Zhiqiang Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4713204?pdf=render
id doaj-ca3f71ad06ff413b83205d3c8bbde11a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca3f71ad06ff413b83205d3c8bbde11a2020-11-25T01:52:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014678410.1371/journal.pone.0146784Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method.Yanni ZhangEn-Tzu TangZhiqiang DuThe analysis of MET gene copy number (CN) has been considered to be a potential biomarker to predict the response to MET-targeted therapies in various cancers. However, the current standard methods to determine MET CN are SNP 6.0 in the genomic DNA of cancer cell lines and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in tumor models, respectively, which are costly and require advanced technical skills and result in relatively subjective judgments. Therefore, we employed a novel method, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), to determine the MET gene copy number with high accuracy and precision.The genomic DNA of cancer cell lines or tumor models were tested and compared with the MET gene CN and MET/CEN-7 ratio determined by SNP 6.0 and FISH, respectively.In cell lines, the linear association of the MET CN detected by ddPCR and SNP 6.0 is strong (Pearson correlation = 0.867). In tumor models, the MET CN detected by ddPCR was significantly different between the MET gene amplification and non-amplification groups according to FISH (mean: 15.4 vs 2.1; P = 0.044). Given that MET gene amplification is defined as MET CN >5.5 by ddPCR, the concordance rate between ddPCR and FISH was 98.0%, and Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.760 (95% CI, 0.498-1.000; P <0.001).The results demonstrated that the ddPCR method has the potential to quantify the MET gene copy number with high precision and accuracy as compared with the results from SNP 6.0 and FISH in cancer cell lines and tumor samples, respectively.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4713204?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yanni Zhang
En-Tzu Tang
Zhiqiang Du
spellingShingle Yanni Zhang
En-Tzu Tang
Zhiqiang Du
Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yanni Zhang
En-Tzu Tang
Zhiqiang Du
author_sort Yanni Zhang
title Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method.
title_short Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method.
title_full Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method.
title_fullStr Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method.
title_full_unstemmed Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method.
title_sort detection of met gene copy number in cancer samples using the droplet digital pcr method.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The analysis of MET gene copy number (CN) has been considered to be a potential biomarker to predict the response to MET-targeted therapies in various cancers. However, the current standard methods to determine MET CN are SNP 6.0 in the genomic DNA of cancer cell lines and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in tumor models, respectively, which are costly and require advanced technical skills and result in relatively subjective judgments. Therefore, we employed a novel method, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), to determine the MET gene copy number with high accuracy and precision.The genomic DNA of cancer cell lines or tumor models were tested and compared with the MET gene CN and MET/CEN-7 ratio determined by SNP 6.0 and FISH, respectively.In cell lines, the linear association of the MET CN detected by ddPCR and SNP 6.0 is strong (Pearson correlation = 0.867). In tumor models, the MET CN detected by ddPCR was significantly different between the MET gene amplification and non-amplification groups according to FISH (mean: 15.4 vs 2.1; P = 0.044). Given that MET gene amplification is defined as MET CN >5.5 by ddPCR, the concordance rate between ddPCR and FISH was 98.0%, and Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.760 (95% CI, 0.498-1.000; P <0.001).The results demonstrated that the ddPCR method has the potential to quantify the MET gene copy number with high precision and accuracy as compared with the results from SNP 6.0 and FISH in cancer cell lines and tumor samples, respectively.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4713204?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yannizhang detectionofmetgenecopynumberincancersamplesusingthedropletdigitalpcrmethod
AT entzutang detectionofmetgenecopynumberincancersamplesusingthedropletdigitalpcrmethod
AT zhiqiangdu detectionofmetgenecopynumberincancersamplesusingthedropletdigitalpcrmethod
_version_ 1724993989206081536