Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method.
The analysis of MET gene copy number (CN) has been considered to be a potential biomarker to predict the response to MET-targeted therapies in various cancers. However, the current standard methods to determine MET CN are SNP 6.0 in the genomic DNA of cancer cell lines and fluorescence in situ hybri...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4713204?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-ca3f71ad06ff413b83205d3c8bbde11a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ca3f71ad06ff413b83205d3c8bbde11a2020-11-25T01:52:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014678410.1371/journal.pone.0146784Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method.Yanni ZhangEn-Tzu TangZhiqiang DuThe analysis of MET gene copy number (CN) has been considered to be a potential biomarker to predict the response to MET-targeted therapies in various cancers. However, the current standard methods to determine MET CN are SNP 6.0 in the genomic DNA of cancer cell lines and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in tumor models, respectively, which are costly and require advanced technical skills and result in relatively subjective judgments. Therefore, we employed a novel method, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), to determine the MET gene copy number with high accuracy and precision.The genomic DNA of cancer cell lines or tumor models were tested and compared with the MET gene CN and MET/CEN-7 ratio determined by SNP 6.0 and FISH, respectively.In cell lines, the linear association of the MET CN detected by ddPCR and SNP 6.0 is strong (Pearson correlation = 0.867). In tumor models, the MET CN detected by ddPCR was significantly different between the MET gene amplification and non-amplification groups according to FISH (mean: 15.4 vs 2.1; P = 0.044). Given that MET gene amplification is defined as MET CN >5.5 by ddPCR, the concordance rate between ddPCR and FISH was 98.0%, and Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.760 (95% CI, 0.498-1.000; P <0.001).The results demonstrated that the ddPCR method has the potential to quantify the MET gene copy number with high precision and accuracy as compared with the results from SNP 6.0 and FISH in cancer cell lines and tumor samples, respectively.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4713204?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yanni Zhang En-Tzu Tang Zhiqiang Du |
spellingShingle |
Yanni Zhang En-Tzu Tang Zhiqiang Du Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Yanni Zhang En-Tzu Tang Zhiqiang Du |
author_sort |
Yanni Zhang |
title |
Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method. |
title_short |
Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method. |
title_full |
Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method. |
title_fullStr |
Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method. |
title_sort |
detection of met gene copy number in cancer samples using the droplet digital pcr method. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
The analysis of MET gene copy number (CN) has been considered to be a potential biomarker to predict the response to MET-targeted therapies in various cancers. However, the current standard methods to determine MET CN are SNP 6.0 in the genomic DNA of cancer cell lines and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in tumor models, respectively, which are costly and require advanced technical skills and result in relatively subjective judgments. Therefore, we employed a novel method, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), to determine the MET gene copy number with high accuracy and precision.The genomic DNA of cancer cell lines or tumor models were tested and compared with the MET gene CN and MET/CEN-7 ratio determined by SNP 6.0 and FISH, respectively.In cell lines, the linear association of the MET CN detected by ddPCR and SNP 6.0 is strong (Pearson correlation = 0.867). In tumor models, the MET CN detected by ddPCR was significantly different between the MET gene amplification and non-amplification groups according to FISH (mean: 15.4 vs 2.1; P = 0.044). Given that MET gene amplification is defined as MET CN >5.5 by ddPCR, the concordance rate between ddPCR and FISH was 98.0%, and Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.760 (95% CI, 0.498-1.000; P <0.001).The results demonstrated that the ddPCR method has the potential to quantify the MET gene copy number with high precision and accuracy as compared with the results from SNP 6.0 and FISH in cancer cell lines and tumor samples, respectively. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4713204?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yannizhang detectionofmetgenecopynumberincancersamplesusingthedropletdigitalpcrmethod AT entzutang detectionofmetgenecopynumberincancersamplesusingthedropletdigitalpcrmethod AT zhiqiangdu detectionofmetgenecopynumberincancersamplesusingthedropletdigitalpcrmethod |
_version_ |
1724993989206081536 |