Police Responses to Persons with Mental Illness: The Policy and Procedures Manual of One Australian Police Agency and ‘Procedural Justice Policy’

Persons with mental illness (PWMI) often report negative perceptions of police treatment following receiving criminalising and heavy-handed police responses. To appropriately control officer discretion and to harness ethical, legal, and efficient police practice when encountering vulnerable and dive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matthew Morgan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/2/42
id doaj-ca35ae669af64f3a83f2f1373bf6202d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca35ae669af64f3a83f2f1373bf6202d2021-01-28T00:04:29ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602021-01-0110424210.3390/socsci10020042Police Responses to Persons with Mental Illness: The Policy and Procedures Manual of One Australian Police Agency and ‘Procedural Justice Policy’Matthew Morgan0School of Justice, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Level 5, X Block Gardens Point, 2 George St, Brisbane 4001, AustraliaPersons with mental illness (PWMI) often report negative perceptions of police treatment following receiving criminalising and heavy-handed police responses. To appropriately control officer discretion and to harness ethical, legal, and efficient police practice when encountering vulnerable and diverse individuals, police agencies across the world issue policy documents to their officers. These documents serve as a reflection regarding how police agencies aspire to manage PWMI in the community. Using a procedural justice framework, this research measures how a large police agency in Australia aspires to manage PWMI and whether the police policy document provides sufficient detail in advocating the appropriate and just police treatment of PWMI. A content analysis of the policy document revealed a lack of sufficient procedural guidelines in effectively controlling police officer discretion when encountering PWMI in the community. This article argues that without further consolidation to embed appropriate procedural guidelines into the policy document, the procedural policy gaps may have a negative effect on the experiences of PWMI when encountering the police.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/2/42policepolicingmental healthpolicydiscretionprocedural justice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew Morgan
spellingShingle Matthew Morgan
Police Responses to Persons with Mental Illness: The Policy and Procedures Manual of One Australian Police Agency and ‘Procedural Justice Policy’
Social Sciences
police
policing
mental health
policy
discretion
procedural justice
author_facet Matthew Morgan
author_sort Matthew Morgan
title Police Responses to Persons with Mental Illness: The Policy and Procedures Manual of One Australian Police Agency and ‘Procedural Justice Policy’
title_short Police Responses to Persons with Mental Illness: The Policy and Procedures Manual of One Australian Police Agency and ‘Procedural Justice Policy’
title_full Police Responses to Persons with Mental Illness: The Policy and Procedures Manual of One Australian Police Agency and ‘Procedural Justice Policy’
title_fullStr Police Responses to Persons with Mental Illness: The Policy and Procedures Manual of One Australian Police Agency and ‘Procedural Justice Policy’
title_full_unstemmed Police Responses to Persons with Mental Illness: The Policy and Procedures Manual of One Australian Police Agency and ‘Procedural Justice Policy’
title_sort police responses to persons with mental illness: the policy and procedures manual of one australian police agency and ‘procedural justice policy’
publisher MDPI AG
series Social Sciences
issn 2076-0760
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Persons with mental illness (PWMI) often report negative perceptions of police treatment following receiving criminalising and heavy-handed police responses. To appropriately control officer discretion and to harness ethical, legal, and efficient police practice when encountering vulnerable and diverse individuals, police agencies across the world issue policy documents to their officers. These documents serve as a reflection regarding how police agencies aspire to manage PWMI in the community. Using a procedural justice framework, this research measures how a large police agency in Australia aspires to manage PWMI and whether the police policy document provides sufficient detail in advocating the appropriate and just police treatment of PWMI. A content analysis of the policy document revealed a lack of sufficient procedural guidelines in effectively controlling police officer discretion when encountering PWMI in the community. This article argues that without further consolidation to embed appropriate procedural guidelines into the policy document, the procedural policy gaps may have a negative effect on the experiences of PWMI when encountering the police.
topic police
policing
mental health
policy
discretion
procedural justice
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/2/42
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewmorgan policeresponsestopersonswithmentalillnessthepolicyandproceduresmanualofoneaustralianpoliceagencyandproceduraljusticepolicy
_version_ 1724320260296802304