Pain Analysis in Patients with Pancreatic Carcinoma: Irreversible Electroporation versus Cryoablation

The aim of this article is to evaluate and compare the postprocedure pain in patients with pancreatic carcinoma treated with irreversible electroporation (IRE) and cryoablation (CRYO). We compared 22 patients with 22 lesions in pancreas treated with IRE and 26 patients with 27 lesions treated with c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiannan Li, Shihou Sheng, Kai Zhang, Tongjun Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2543026
id doaj-ca272bd76f4f495390ab7e82de879139
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca272bd76f4f495390ab7e82de8791392020-11-24T21:27:18ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412016-01-01201610.1155/2016/25430262543026Pain Analysis in Patients with Pancreatic Carcinoma: Irreversible Electroporation versus CryoablationJiannan Li0Shihou Sheng1Kai Zhang2Tongjun Liu3Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Colorectal and Anal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, ChinaDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, ChinaDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, ChinaThe aim of this article is to evaluate and compare the postprocedure pain in patients with pancreatic carcinoma treated with irreversible electroporation (IRE) and cryoablation (CRYO). We compared 22 patients with 22 lesions in pancreas treated with IRE and 26 patients with 27 lesions treated with cryosurgery. All the patients in the two groups were under celiac plexus block (CPB) treatment to alleviate the postprocedure pain. A numerical rating scale (VAS) consisting of 11-point scales and the 24 h total hydromorphone use were recorded for the analysis of the pain level in the patients who underwent these two technologies separately. Other parameters, such as the complications and the ECOG performance status, were also noted. Statistical analysis was performed by Fisher’s exact test, the Chi-square test, and Student’s t-test. All the pancreatic carcinoma patients in our study were reported to have postprocedure pain in the two groups. But there was no significant difference in the mean pain score (4.95 (IRE) versus 4.85 (CRYO); P=0.52) and 24 h total hydromorphone use (3.89 mg (IRE) versus 3.97 mg (CRYO); P=0.30). IRE is comparable to cryotherapy in the amount of pain that patients with pancreatic carcinoma experience.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2543026
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiannan Li
Shihou Sheng
Kai Zhang
Tongjun Liu
spellingShingle Jiannan Li
Shihou Sheng
Kai Zhang
Tongjun Liu
Pain Analysis in Patients with Pancreatic Carcinoma: Irreversible Electroporation versus Cryoablation
BioMed Research International
author_facet Jiannan Li
Shihou Sheng
Kai Zhang
Tongjun Liu
author_sort Jiannan Li
title Pain Analysis in Patients with Pancreatic Carcinoma: Irreversible Electroporation versus Cryoablation
title_short Pain Analysis in Patients with Pancreatic Carcinoma: Irreversible Electroporation versus Cryoablation
title_full Pain Analysis in Patients with Pancreatic Carcinoma: Irreversible Electroporation versus Cryoablation
title_fullStr Pain Analysis in Patients with Pancreatic Carcinoma: Irreversible Electroporation versus Cryoablation
title_full_unstemmed Pain Analysis in Patients with Pancreatic Carcinoma: Irreversible Electroporation versus Cryoablation
title_sort pain analysis in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: irreversible electroporation versus cryoablation
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The aim of this article is to evaluate and compare the postprocedure pain in patients with pancreatic carcinoma treated with irreversible electroporation (IRE) and cryoablation (CRYO). We compared 22 patients with 22 lesions in pancreas treated with IRE and 26 patients with 27 lesions treated with cryosurgery. All the patients in the two groups were under celiac plexus block (CPB) treatment to alleviate the postprocedure pain. A numerical rating scale (VAS) consisting of 11-point scales and the 24 h total hydromorphone use were recorded for the analysis of the pain level in the patients who underwent these two technologies separately. Other parameters, such as the complications and the ECOG performance status, were also noted. Statistical analysis was performed by Fisher’s exact test, the Chi-square test, and Student’s t-test. All the pancreatic carcinoma patients in our study were reported to have postprocedure pain in the two groups. But there was no significant difference in the mean pain score (4.95 (IRE) versus 4.85 (CRYO); P=0.52) and 24 h total hydromorphone use (3.89 mg (IRE) versus 3.97 mg (CRYO); P=0.30). IRE is comparable to cryotherapy in the amount of pain that patients with pancreatic carcinoma experience.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2543026
work_keys_str_mv AT jiannanli painanalysisinpatientswithpancreaticcarcinomairreversibleelectroporationversuscryoablation
AT shihousheng painanalysisinpatientswithpancreaticcarcinomairreversibleelectroporationversuscryoablation
AT kaizhang painanalysisinpatientswithpancreaticcarcinomairreversibleelectroporationversuscryoablation
AT tongjunliu painanalysisinpatientswithpancreaticcarcinomairreversibleelectroporationversuscryoablation
_version_ 1725975532836749312