Article Commentary: Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?

Cancers have long been described as the result of successive selections of somatic cells progressively acquiring growth and survival advantages. Such a model was hardly compatible with the obvious heterogeneity of the cancer cell population present in tumors. This heterogeneity rather suggests that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jérémy Bastid, Alain Puisieux, Stéphane Ansieau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2008-01-01
Series:Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/CMO.S603
id doaj-ca01ca909be349e784e85abffe447032
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca01ca909be349e784e85abffe4470322020-11-25T01:23:55ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Oncology1179-55492008-01-01210.4137/CMO.S603Article Commentary: Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?Jérémy Bastid0Alain Puisieux1Stéphane Ansieau2Université Lyon 1, ISPB, Lyon, F-69003, France.Université Lyon 1, ISPB, Lyon, F-69003, France.Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, F-69008, France.Cancers have long been described as the result of successive selections of somatic cells progressively acquiring growth and survival advantages. Such a model was hardly compatible with the obvious heterogeneity of the cancer cell population present in tumors. This heterogeneity rather suggests that mutations hint multipotent cells that, in addition to the resulting proliferation and survival advantages, display differentiation capabilities. Adult stem cells or progenitors display similar properties, supporting the concept that cancers actually originate from these cells. The recent observation that differentiated cells can dedifferentiate and acquire stemness properties suggests an alternative and additional explanation for the origin of “cancer-initiating” cells and reopens the debate of the contribution of somatic cells to cancer progression.https://doi.org/10.4137/CMO.S603
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jérémy Bastid
Alain Puisieux
Stéphane Ansieau
spellingShingle Jérémy Bastid
Alain Puisieux
Stéphane Ansieau
Article Commentary: Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
author_facet Jérémy Bastid
Alain Puisieux
Stéphane Ansieau
author_sort Jérémy Bastid
title Article Commentary: Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
title_short Article Commentary: Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
title_full Article Commentary: Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
title_fullStr Article Commentary: Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
title_full_unstemmed Article Commentary: Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
title_sort article commentary: should we consider cancers as embryonic diseases or as consequences of stem-cell deregulation?
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
issn 1179-5549
publishDate 2008-01-01
description Cancers have long been described as the result of successive selections of somatic cells progressively acquiring growth and survival advantages. Such a model was hardly compatible with the obvious heterogeneity of the cancer cell population present in tumors. This heterogeneity rather suggests that mutations hint multipotent cells that, in addition to the resulting proliferation and survival advantages, display differentiation capabilities. Adult stem cells or progenitors display similar properties, supporting the concept that cancers actually originate from these cells. The recent observation that differentiated cells can dedifferentiate and acquire stemness properties suggests an alternative and additional explanation for the origin of “cancer-initiating” cells and reopens the debate of the contribution of somatic cells to cancer progression.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/CMO.S603
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremybastid articlecommentaryshouldweconsidercancersasembryonicdiseasesorasconsequencesofstemcellderegulation
AT alainpuisieux articlecommentaryshouldweconsidercancersasembryonicdiseasesorasconsequencesofstemcellderegulation
AT stephaneansieau articlecommentaryshouldweconsidercancersasembryonicdiseasesorasconsequencesofstemcellderegulation
_version_ 1725120060639412224