Applying the Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Landscape Architecture Design: Challenges and Opportunities
Landscape architects play a significant role in safeguarding urban landscapes and human well-being by means of design and they call for practical knowledge, skills, and methods to address increasing environmental pressure. Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are recognized as highly related to landsca...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Land |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/665 |
id |
doaj-c9f963aa20134e7ab7c9b83edfa2bcaa |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c9f963aa20134e7ab7c9b83edfa2bcaa2021-07-23T13:49:54ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-06-011066566510.3390/land10070665Applying the Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Landscape Architecture Design: Challenges and OpportunitiesXin Cheng0Sylvie Van Damme1Pieter Uyttenhove2Department of Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, ChinaSchool of Arts, University College Ghent, 9000 Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, BelgiumLandscape architects play a significant role in safeguarding urban landscapes and human well-being by means of design and they call for practical knowledge, skills, and methods to address increasing environmental pressure. Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are recognized as highly related to landscape architecture (LA) studies, and the outcomes of CES evaluations have the potential to support LA practice. However, few efforts have focused on systematically investigating CES in LA studies. Additionally, how CES evaluations are performed in LA studies is rarely researched. This study aims to identify the challenges and provide recommendations for applying CES evaluations to LA practice, focusing specifically on LA design. To conclude, three challenges are identified, namely a lack of consistent concepts (conceptual challenge); a lack of CES evaluation methods to inform designs (methodological challenge); and practical issues of transferring CES evaluations to LA design (practical challenge). Based on our findings, we highlight using CES as a common term to refer to socio-cultural values and encourage more CES evaluation methods to be developed and tested for LA design. In addition, we encourage more studies to explore the links of CES and landscape features and address other practical issues to better transfer CES evaluations onto LA designs.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/665landscape architecturecultural ecosystem servicesdesignevaluation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xin Cheng Sylvie Van Damme Pieter Uyttenhove |
spellingShingle |
Xin Cheng Sylvie Van Damme Pieter Uyttenhove Applying the Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Landscape Architecture Design: Challenges and Opportunities Land landscape architecture cultural ecosystem services design evaluation |
author_facet |
Xin Cheng Sylvie Van Damme Pieter Uyttenhove |
author_sort |
Xin Cheng |
title |
Applying the Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Landscape Architecture Design: Challenges and Opportunities |
title_short |
Applying the Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Landscape Architecture Design: Challenges and Opportunities |
title_full |
Applying the Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Landscape Architecture Design: Challenges and Opportunities |
title_fullStr |
Applying the Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Landscape Architecture Design: Challenges and Opportunities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Applying the Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Landscape Architecture Design: Challenges and Opportunities |
title_sort |
applying the evaluation of cultural ecosystem services in landscape architecture design: challenges and opportunities |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Land |
issn |
2073-445X |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Landscape architects play a significant role in safeguarding urban landscapes and human well-being by means of design and they call for practical knowledge, skills, and methods to address increasing environmental pressure. Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are recognized as highly related to landscape architecture (LA) studies, and the outcomes of CES evaluations have the potential to support LA practice. However, few efforts have focused on systematically investigating CES in LA studies. Additionally, how CES evaluations are performed in LA studies is rarely researched. This study aims to identify the challenges and provide recommendations for applying CES evaluations to LA practice, focusing specifically on LA design. To conclude, three challenges are identified, namely a lack of consistent concepts (conceptual challenge); a lack of CES evaluation methods to inform designs (methodological challenge); and practical issues of transferring CES evaluations to LA design (practical challenge). Based on our findings, we highlight using CES as a common term to refer to socio-cultural values and encourage more CES evaluation methods to be developed and tested for LA design. In addition, we encourage more studies to explore the links of CES and landscape features and address other practical issues to better transfer CES evaluations onto LA designs. |
topic |
landscape architecture cultural ecosystem services design evaluation |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/665 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xincheng applyingtheevaluationofculturalecosystemservicesinlandscapearchitecturedesignchallengesandopportunities AT sylvievandamme applyingtheevaluationofculturalecosystemservicesinlandscapearchitecturedesignchallengesandopportunities AT pieteruyttenhove applyingtheevaluationofculturalecosystemservicesinlandscapearchitecturedesignchallengesandopportunities |
_version_ |
1721287500057542656 |