“Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808)
This article proposes to explore the commercial dimensions of the slave trade suppression in the United States during the early national period. It draws attention to recent scholarship on the Atlantic slave trade and the politics of slavery in the early American republic to show that the slave trad...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Société d'Etudes Anglo-Américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles
2020-12-01
|
Series: | XVII-XVIII |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/1718/6037 |
id |
doaj-c9dc634155d140299bb2f06ed1f277e3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c9dc634155d140299bb2f06ed1f277e32021-01-04T08:26:11ZengSociété d'Etudes Anglo-Américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe sièclesXVII-XVIII0291-37982117-590X2020-12-017710.4000/1718.6037“Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808)Andy CabotThis article proposes to explore the commercial dimensions of the slave trade suppression in the United States during the early national period. It draws attention to recent scholarship on the Atlantic slave trade and the politics of slavery in the early American republic to show that the slave trade shaped the national debate on slavery throughout the twenty-year period after the Constitution. It did so by opposing two groups in Congress and in the states who had varying interests in defending or opposing the trade, and who clashed mainly over the extent of federal power on the trade. These groups fixed the terms of the debate by both emphasizing the primarily commercial aspect of the traffic as well as the government’s proper role about its continuation. Thus, the article argues that the political debate on trafficking was above all a debate on the place of trade within the early republic, where antagonistic conceptions on the role of the state in the regulation of trade were mobilized by the actors of the debate to support the political legitimacy of their opposition to or support of the trade.http://journals.openedition.org/1718/6037transatlantic slave tradeearly American Republicabolitionismcommercethe Age of Revolutions |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andy Cabot |
spellingShingle |
Andy Cabot “Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808) XVII-XVIII transatlantic slave trade early American Republic abolitionism commerce the Age of Revolutions |
author_facet |
Andy Cabot |
author_sort |
Andy Cabot |
title |
“Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808) |
title_short |
“Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808) |
title_full |
“Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808) |
title_fullStr |
“Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808) |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808) |
title_sort |
“why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: the slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early american republic (1787-1808) |
publisher |
Société d'Etudes Anglo-Américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles |
series |
XVII-XVIII |
issn |
0291-3798 2117-590X |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
This article proposes to explore the commercial dimensions of the slave trade suppression in the United States during the early national period. It draws attention to recent scholarship on the Atlantic slave trade and the politics of slavery in the early American republic to show that the slave trade shaped the national debate on slavery throughout the twenty-year period after the Constitution. It did so by opposing two groups in Congress and in the states who had varying interests in defending or opposing the trade, and who clashed mainly over the extent of federal power on the trade. These groups fixed the terms of the debate by both emphasizing the primarily commercial aspect of the traffic as well as the government’s proper role about its continuation. Thus, the article argues that the political debate on trafficking was above all a debate on the place of trade within the early republic, where antagonistic conceptions on the role of the state in the regulation of trade were mobilized by the actors of the debate to support the political legitimacy of their opposition to or support of the trade. |
topic |
transatlantic slave trade early American Republic abolitionism commerce the Age of Revolutions |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/1718/6037 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andycabot whymaynotourcountrybeenrichedbythatlucrativetraffictheslavetradeandthefailedpoliticsoffederalproscriptionintheearlyamericanrepublic17871808 |
_version_ |
1724349597750394880 |