“Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808)

This article proposes to explore the commercial dimensions of the slave trade suppression in the United States during the early national period. It draws attention to recent scholarship on the Atlantic slave trade and the politics of slavery in the early American republic to show that the slave trad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andy Cabot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Société d'Etudes Anglo-Américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles 2020-12-01
Series:XVII-XVIII
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/1718/6037
id doaj-c9dc634155d140299bb2f06ed1f277e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9dc634155d140299bb2f06ed1f277e32021-01-04T08:26:11ZengSociété d'Etudes Anglo-Américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe sièclesXVII-XVIII0291-37982117-590X2020-12-017710.4000/1718.6037“Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808)Andy CabotThis article proposes to explore the commercial dimensions of the slave trade suppression in the United States during the early national period. It draws attention to recent scholarship on the Atlantic slave trade and the politics of slavery in the early American republic to show that the slave trade shaped the national debate on slavery throughout the twenty-year period after the Constitution. It did so by opposing two groups in Congress and in the states who had varying interests in defending or opposing the trade, and who clashed mainly over the extent of federal power on the trade. These groups fixed the terms of the debate by both emphasizing the primarily commercial aspect of the traffic as well as the government’s proper role about its continuation. Thus, the article argues that the political debate on trafficking was above all a debate on the place of trade within the early republic, where antagonistic conceptions on the role of the state in the regulation of trade were mobilized by the actors of the debate to support the political legitimacy of their opposition to or support of the trade.http://journals.openedition.org/1718/6037transatlantic slave tradeearly American Republicabolitionismcommercethe Age of Revolutions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andy Cabot
spellingShingle Andy Cabot
“Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808)
XVII-XVIII
transatlantic slave trade
early American Republic
abolitionism
commerce
the Age of Revolutions
author_facet Andy Cabot
author_sort Andy Cabot
title “Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808)
title_short “Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808)
title_full “Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808)
title_fullStr “Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808)
title_full_unstemmed “Why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: The slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early American Republic (1787-1808)
title_sort “why may not our country be enriched by that lucrative traffic?”: the slave trade and the failed politics of federal proscription in the early american republic (1787-1808)
publisher Société d'Etudes Anglo-Américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles
series XVII-XVIII
issn 0291-3798
2117-590X
publishDate 2020-12-01
description This article proposes to explore the commercial dimensions of the slave trade suppression in the United States during the early national period. It draws attention to recent scholarship on the Atlantic slave trade and the politics of slavery in the early American republic to show that the slave trade shaped the national debate on slavery throughout the twenty-year period after the Constitution. It did so by opposing two groups in Congress and in the states who had varying interests in defending or opposing the trade, and who clashed mainly over the extent of federal power on the trade. These groups fixed the terms of the debate by both emphasizing the primarily commercial aspect of the traffic as well as the government’s proper role about its continuation. Thus, the article argues that the political debate on trafficking was above all a debate on the place of trade within the early republic, where antagonistic conceptions on the role of the state in the regulation of trade were mobilized by the actors of the debate to support the political legitimacy of their opposition to or support of the trade.
topic transatlantic slave trade
early American Republic
abolitionism
commerce
the Age of Revolutions
url http://journals.openedition.org/1718/6037
work_keys_str_mv AT andycabot whymaynotourcountrybeenrichedbythatlucrativetraffictheslavetradeandthefailedpoliticsoffederalproscriptionintheearlyamericanrepublic17871808
_version_ 1724349597750394880