How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? An analysis using a cell tensegrity model

A eukaryotic cell attaches and spreads on substrates, whether it is the extracellular matrix naturally produced by the cell itself, or artificial materials, such as tissue-engineered scaffolds. Attachment and spreading require the cell to apply forces in the nN range to the substrate via adhesion si...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G De Santis, AB Lennon, F Boschetti, B Verhegghe, P Verdonck, PJ Prendergast
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AO Research Institute Davos 2011-10-01
Series:European Cells & Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecmjournal.org/journal/papers/vol022/pdf/v022a16.pdf
id doaj-c9d2f2dce19549da975ed8bd58342b97
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9d2f2dce19549da975ed8bd58342b972020-11-24T21:56:49Zeng AO Research Institute DavosEuropean Cells & Materials1473-22622011-10-0122202213How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? An analysis using a cell tensegrity modelG De SantisAB LennonF BoschettiB VerheggheP VerdonckPJ PrendergastA eukaryotic cell attaches and spreads on substrates, whether it is the extracellular matrix naturally produced by the cell itself, or artificial materials, such as tissue-engineered scaffolds. Attachment and spreading require the cell to apply forces in the nN range to the substrate via adhesion sites, and these forces are balanced by the elastic response of the substrate. This mechanical interaction is one determinant of cell morphology and, ultimately, cell phenotype. In this paper we use a finite element model of a cell, with a tensegrity structure to model the cytoskeleton of actin filaments and microtubules, to explore the way cells sense the stiffness of the substrate and thereby adapt to it. To support the computational results, an analytical 1D model is developed for comparison. We find that (i) the tensegrity hypothesis of the cytoskeleton is sufficient to explain the matrix-elasticity sensing, (ii) cell sensitivity is not constant but has a bell-shaped distribution over the physiological matrix-elasticity range, and (iii) the position of the sensitivity peak over the matrix-elasticity range depends on the cytoskeletal structure and in particular on the F-actin organisation. Our model suggests that F-actin reorganisation observed in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in response to change of matrix elasticity is a structural-remodelling process that shifts the sensitivity peak towards the new value of matrix elasticity. This finding discloses a potential regulatory role of scaffold stiffness for cell differentiation.http://www.ecmjournal.org/journal/papers/vol022/pdf/v022a16.pdfBiophysical modeltensegritymatrix elasticityFinite Element Methodanalytical modelmesenchymal stem cells
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G De Santis
AB Lennon
F Boschetti
B Verhegghe
P Verdonck
PJ Prendergast
spellingShingle G De Santis
AB Lennon
F Boschetti
B Verhegghe
P Verdonck
PJ Prendergast
How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? An analysis using a cell tensegrity model
European Cells & Materials
Biophysical model
tensegrity
matrix elasticity
Finite Element Method
analytical model
mesenchymal stem cells
author_facet G De Santis
AB Lennon
F Boschetti
B Verhegghe
P Verdonck
PJ Prendergast
author_sort G De Santis
title How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? An analysis using a cell tensegrity model
title_short How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? An analysis using a cell tensegrity model
title_full How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? An analysis using a cell tensegrity model
title_fullStr How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? An analysis using a cell tensegrity model
title_full_unstemmed How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? An analysis using a cell tensegrity model
title_sort how can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? an analysis using a cell tensegrity model
publisher AO Research Institute Davos
series European Cells & Materials
issn 1473-2262
publishDate 2011-10-01
description A eukaryotic cell attaches and spreads on substrates, whether it is the extracellular matrix naturally produced by the cell itself, or artificial materials, such as tissue-engineered scaffolds. Attachment and spreading require the cell to apply forces in the nN range to the substrate via adhesion sites, and these forces are balanced by the elastic response of the substrate. This mechanical interaction is one determinant of cell morphology and, ultimately, cell phenotype. In this paper we use a finite element model of a cell, with a tensegrity structure to model the cytoskeleton of actin filaments and microtubules, to explore the way cells sense the stiffness of the substrate and thereby adapt to it. To support the computational results, an analytical 1D model is developed for comparison. We find that (i) the tensegrity hypothesis of the cytoskeleton is sufficient to explain the matrix-elasticity sensing, (ii) cell sensitivity is not constant but has a bell-shaped distribution over the physiological matrix-elasticity range, and (iii) the position of the sensitivity peak over the matrix-elasticity range depends on the cytoskeletal structure and in particular on the F-actin organisation. Our model suggests that F-actin reorganisation observed in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in response to change of matrix elasticity is a structural-remodelling process that shifts the sensitivity peak towards the new value of matrix elasticity. This finding discloses a potential regulatory role of scaffold stiffness for cell differentiation.
topic Biophysical model
tensegrity
matrix elasticity
Finite Element Method
analytical model
mesenchymal stem cells
url http://www.ecmjournal.org/journal/papers/vol022/pdf/v022a16.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gdesantis howcancellssensetheelasticityofasubstrateananalysisusingacelltensegritymodel
AT ablennon howcancellssensetheelasticityofasubstrateananalysisusingacelltensegritymodel
AT fboschetti howcancellssensetheelasticityofasubstrateananalysisusingacelltensegritymodel
AT bverhegghe howcancellssensetheelasticityofasubstrateananalysisusingacelltensegritymodel
AT pverdonck howcancellssensetheelasticityofasubstrateananalysisusingacelltensegritymodel
AT pjprendergast howcancellssensetheelasticityofasubstrateananalysisusingacelltensegritymodel
_version_ 1725856947406635008