Minimum aerosol layer detection sensitivities and their subsequent impacts on aerosol optical thickness retrievals in CALIPSO level 2 data products

Due to instrument sensitivities and algorithm detection limits, level 2 (L2) Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) 532 nm aerosol extinction profile retrievals are often populated with retrieval fill values (RFVs), which indicate the absence of detectable levels of aerosol wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. D. Toth, J. R. Campbell, J. S. Reid, J. L. Tackett, M. A. Vaughan, J. Zhang, J. W. Marquis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/499/2018/amt-11-499-2018.pdf
id doaj-c9c6d643d6a944cc9235a964239df3a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9c6d643d6a944cc9235a964239df3a92020-11-24T22:33:44ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482018-01-011149951410.5194/amt-11-499-2018Minimum aerosol layer detection sensitivities and their subsequent impacts on aerosol optical thickness retrievals in CALIPSO level 2 data productsT. D. Toth0J. R. Campbell1J. S. Reid2J. L. Tackett3M. A. Vaughan4J. Zhang5J. W. Marquis6Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USAAerosol and Radiation Sciences Section, Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, USAAerosol and Radiation Sciences Section, Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, USAScience Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USANASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USADept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USADept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USADue to instrument sensitivities and algorithm detection limits, level 2 (L2) Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) 532 nm aerosol extinction profile retrievals are often populated with retrieval fill values (RFVs), which indicate the absence of detectable levels of aerosol within the profile. In this study, using 4 years (2007–2008 and 2010–2011) of CALIOP version 3 L2 aerosol data, the occurrence frequency of daytime CALIOP profiles containing all RFVs (all-RFV profiles) is studied. In the CALIOP data products, the aerosol optical thickness (AOT) of any all-RFV profile is reported as being zero, which may introduce a bias in CALIOP-based AOT climatologies. For this study, we derive revised estimates of AOT for all-RFV profiles using collocated Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Dark Target (DT) and, where available, AErosol RObotic NEtwork (AERONET) data. Globally, all-RFV profiles comprise roughly 71 % of all daytime CALIOP L2 aerosol profiles (i.e., including completely attenuated profiles), accounting for nearly half (45 %) of all daytime cloud-free L2 aerosol profiles. The mean collocated MODIS DT (AERONET) 550 nm AOT is found to be near 0.06 (0.08) for CALIOP all-RFV profiles. We further estimate a global mean aerosol extinction profile, a so-called <q>noise floor</q>, for CALIOP all-RFV profiles. The global mean CALIOP AOT is then recomputed by replacing RFV values with the derived noise-floor values for both all-RFV and non-all-RFV profiles. This process yields an improvement in the agreement of CALIOP and MODIS over-ocean AOT.https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/499/2018/amt-11-499-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. D. Toth
J. R. Campbell
J. S. Reid
J. L. Tackett
M. A. Vaughan
J. Zhang
J. W. Marquis
spellingShingle T. D. Toth
J. R. Campbell
J. S. Reid
J. L. Tackett
M. A. Vaughan
J. Zhang
J. W. Marquis
Minimum aerosol layer detection sensitivities and their subsequent impacts on aerosol optical thickness retrievals in CALIPSO level 2 data products
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet T. D. Toth
J. R. Campbell
J. S. Reid
J. L. Tackett
M. A. Vaughan
J. Zhang
J. W. Marquis
author_sort T. D. Toth
title Minimum aerosol layer detection sensitivities and their subsequent impacts on aerosol optical thickness retrievals in CALIPSO level 2 data products
title_short Minimum aerosol layer detection sensitivities and their subsequent impacts on aerosol optical thickness retrievals in CALIPSO level 2 data products
title_full Minimum aerosol layer detection sensitivities and their subsequent impacts on aerosol optical thickness retrievals in CALIPSO level 2 data products
title_fullStr Minimum aerosol layer detection sensitivities and their subsequent impacts on aerosol optical thickness retrievals in CALIPSO level 2 data products
title_full_unstemmed Minimum aerosol layer detection sensitivities and their subsequent impacts on aerosol optical thickness retrievals in CALIPSO level 2 data products
title_sort minimum aerosol layer detection sensitivities and their subsequent impacts on aerosol optical thickness retrievals in calipso level 2 data products
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Due to instrument sensitivities and algorithm detection limits, level 2 (L2) Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) 532 nm aerosol extinction profile retrievals are often populated with retrieval fill values (RFVs), which indicate the absence of detectable levels of aerosol within the profile. In this study, using 4 years (2007–2008 and 2010–2011) of CALIOP version 3 L2 aerosol data, the occurrence frequency of daytime CALIOP profiles containing all RFVs (all-RFV profiles) is studied. In the CALIOP data products, the aerosol optical thickness (AOT) of any all-RFV profile is reported as being zero, which may introduce a bias in CALIOP-based AOT climatologies. For this study, we derive revised estimates of AOT for all-RFV profiles using collocated Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Dark Target (DT) and, where available, AErosol RObotic NEtwork (AERONET) data. Globally, all-RFV profiles comprise roughly 71 % of all daytime CALIOP L2 aerosol profiles (i.e., including completely attenuated profiles), accounting for nearly half (45 %) of all daytime cloud-free L2 aerosol profiles. The mean collocated MODIS DT (AERONET) 550 nm AOT is found to be near 0.06 (0.08) for CALIOP all-RFV profiles. We further estimate a global mean aerosol extinction profile, a so-called <q>noise floor</q>, for CALIOP all-RFV profiles. The global mean CALIOP AOT is then recomputed by replacing RFV values with the derived noise-floor values for both all-RFV and non-all-RFV profiles. This process yields an improvement in the agreement of CALIOP and MODIS over-ocean AOT.
url https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/499/2018/amt-11-499-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tdtoth minimumaerosollayerdetectionsensitivitiesandtheirsubsequentimpactsonaerosolopticalthicknessretrievalsincalipsolevel2dataproducts
AT jrcampbell minimumaerosollayerdetectionsensitivitiesandtheirsubsequentimpactsonaerosolopticalthicknessretrievalsincalipsolevel2dataproducts
AT jsreid minimumaerosollayerdetectionsensitivitiesandtheirsubsequentimpactsonaerosolopticalthicknessretrievalsincalipsolevel2dataproducts
AT jltackett minimumaerosollayerdetectionsensitivitiesandtheirsubsequentimpactsonaerosolopticalthicknessretrievalsincalipsolevel2dataproducts
AT mavaughan minimumaerosollayerdetectionsensitivitiesandtheirsubsequentimpactsonaerosolopticalthicknessretrievalsincalipsolevel2dataproducts
AT jzhang minimumaerosollayerdetectionsensitivitiesandtheirsubsequentimpactsonaerosolopticalthicknessretrievalsincalipsolevel2dataproducts
AT jwmarquis minimumaerosollayerdetectionsensitivitiesandtheirsubsequentimpactsonaerosolopticalthicknessretrievalsincalipsolevel2dataproducts
_version_ 1725729560385814528