THE DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGS

THE DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGS

The object of this article is the analysis of the institute of public hearings from the perspective of its dual function: to fulfill epistemic deficits; and to ensure the participation of civil society and institutions interested in the debates held in the Supreme Court. The purpose of the analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Raphael Marcelino de Almeida Nunes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro 2019-12-01
Series:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
Subjects:
constitutional law
judicial review
public hearings
democracy
constitutional interpretation
Online Access:https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/40679/30565
id doaj-c9ba21184eb24147bd815f36dc17b201
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9ba21184eb24147bd815f36dc17b2012021-07-01T03:17:17ZengUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRevista Eletrônica de Direito Processual1982-76362019-12-01203430450https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2019.40679THE DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGSRaphael Marcelino de Almeida Nunes0Instituto Brasiliense de Direito Público (IDP)The object of this article is the analysis of the institute of public hearings from the perspective of its dual function: to fulfill epistemic deficits; and to ensure the participation of civil society and institutions interested in the debates held in the Supreme Court. The purpose of the analysis is to verify the validity of the hypothesis that the fulfillment of this dual function could guarantee the democratic legitimacy of the judicial review to decide sensitive political questions.https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/40679/30565constitutional lawjudicial reviewpublic hearingsdemocracyconstitutional interpretation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raphael Marcelino de Almeida Nunes
spellingShingle Raphael Marcelino de Almeida Nunes
THE DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGS
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
constitutional law
judicial review
public hearings
democracy
constitutional interpretation
author_facet Raphael Marcelino de Almeida Nunes
author_sort Raphael Marcelino de Almeida Nunes
title THE DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGS
title_short THE DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGS
title_full THE DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGS
title_fullStr THE DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGS
title_full_unstemmed THE DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGS
title_sort democratic legitimacy of the judicial review and the public hearings
publisher Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
series Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
issn 1982-7636
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The object of this article is the analysis of the institute of public hearings from the perspective of its dual function: to fulfill epistemic deficits; and to ensure the participation of civil society and institutions interested in the debates held in the Supreme Court. The purpose of the analysis is to verify the validity of the hypothesis that the fulfillment of this dual function could guarantee the democratic legitimacy of the judicial review to decide sensitive political questions.
topic constitutional law
judicial review
public hearings
democracy
constitutional interpretation
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/40679/30565
work_keys_str_mv AT raphaelmarcelinodealmeidanunes thedemocraticlegitimacyofthejudicialreviewandthepublichearings
AT raphaelmarcelinodealmeidanunes democraticlegitimacyofthejudicialreviewandthepublichearings
_version_ 1721347669320794112

Similar Items