Why were Soviet social institutions immune to technological innovation

The Soviet economic system of the 1960–1980’s can be characterized as state capitalism. However, this fails to explain many important properties of the system, primarily — its inability to introduce new technologies at a large scale, in contrast to classic capitalism. We attempted to identify that s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aleksey P. Ermilov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2017-03-01
Series:Социологический журнал
Online Access:http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/5004/submission/proof/5004-61-10076-1-10-20170929.pdf
id doaj-c9b84f71df15415894770cc6b9eba104
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9b84f71df15415894770cc6b9eba1042020-11-25T02:18:34ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологический журнал1562-24952017-03-0123111112510.19181/socjour.2017.23.1.50045004Why were Soviet social institutions immune to technological innovationAleksey P. Ermilov0Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesThe Soviet economic system of the 1960–1980’s can be characterized as state capitalism. However, this fails to explain many important properties of the system, primarily — its inability to introduce new technologies at a large scale, in contrast to classic capitalism. We attempted to identify that specific feature of Soviet society which affected the efficiency of state-capitalist institutions. We consider such pseudo-form, in which the Soviet “socialist” government was forced to invest these institutions. Because of this the essence of the Soviet economy should be defined as “perverted state capitalism”. An effort to give state-capitalist relations a socialistic form lead to their content becoming perverted and diluted, in other words — significantly reduced in terms of efficiency. This lead to the distortion and weakening of the capitalist motivations of key economic actors — nomenclature and workers. Eventually the Soviet economy turned into a collection of constantly inefficient institutions, which were not able to provide accelerated innovative development.http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/5004/submission/proof/5004-61-10076-1-10-20170929.pdf
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aleksey P. Ermilov
spellingShingle Aleksey P. Ermilov
Why were Soviet social institutions immune to technological innovation
Социологический журнал
author_facet Aleksey P. Ermilov
author_sort Aleksey P. Ermilov
title Why were Soviet social institutions immune to technological innovation
title_short Why were Soviet social institutions immune to technological innovation
title_full Why were Soviet social institutions immune to technological innovation
title_fullStr Why were Soviet social institutions immune to technological innovation
title_full_unstemmed Why were Soviet social institutions immune to technological innovation
title_sort why were soviet social institutions immune to technological innovation
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
series Социологический журнал
issn 1562-2495
publishDate 2017-03-01
description The Soviet economic system of the 1960–1980’s can be characterized as state capitalism. However, this fails to explain many important properties of the system, primarily — its inability to introduce new technologies at a large scale, in contrast to classic capitalism. We attempted to identify that specific feature of Soviet society which affected the efficiency of state-capitalist institutions. We consider such pseudo-form, in which the Soviet “socialist” government was forced to invest these institutions. Because of this the essence of the Soviet economy should be defined as “perverted state capitalism”. An effort to give state-capitalist relations a socialistic form lead to their content becoming perverted and diluted, in other words — significantly reduced in terms of efficiency. This lead to the distortion and weakening of the capitalist motivations of key economic actors — nomenclature and workers. Eventually the Soviet economy turned into a collection of constantly inefficient institutions, which were not able to provide accelerated innovative development.
url http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/5004/submission/proof/5004-61-10076-1-10-20170929.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alekseypermilov whyweresovietsocialinstitutionsimmunetotechnologicalinnovation
_version_ 1724881306664304640