Decision-Making Behaviour under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: An English Perspective

In England and Wales, the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) provides the legal framework which governs decisions made concerning the care and treatment of those suffering from mental disorders, where they may pose a risk to themselves or others. The perspective of the patient and the care provider m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicola Glover-Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-03-01
Series:Laws
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/2/12
id doaj-c9885f5deb5143d98c249006f37e0a64
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9885f5deb5143d98c249006f37e0a642020-11-24T21:05:51ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2018-03-01721210.3390/laws7020012laws7020012Decision-Making Behaviour under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: An English PerspectiveNicola Glover-Thomas0School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UKIn England and Wales, the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) provides the legal framework which governs decisions made concerning the care and treatment of those suffering from mental disorders, where they may pose a risk to themselves or others. The perspective of the patient and the care provider may conflict and can be a source of tension and challenge within mental health law. Through access to a mental health tribunal, patients are offered the apparatus to review and challenge their detention. With detention rates under the mental health legislation rising exponentially, this is having a knock-on effect upon tribunal application numbers. As there is a legal requirement to review all cases of individuals detained under the MHA 1983, understanding the key drivers for this increase in detention is essential in order to understand how to better manage both detention rates and the upsurge in tribunal caseloads. With the increase in overall activity, mental health tribunal workloads present significant practical challenges and has downstream cost implications.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/2/12detentioncaseloadmental health tribunalMental Health Act 1983decision-makingriskcosts
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicola Glover-Thomas
spellingShingle Nicola Glover-Thomas
Decision-Making Behaviour under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: An English Perspective
Laws
detention
caseload
mental health tribunal
Mental Health Act 1983
decision-making
risk
costs
author_facet Nicola Glover-Thomas
author_sort Nicola Glover-Thomas
title Decision-Making Behaviour under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: An English Perspective
title_short Decision-Making Behaviour under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: An English Perspective
title_full Decision-Making Behaviour under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: An English Perspective
title_fullStr Decision-Making Behaviour under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: An English Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Decision-Making Behaviour under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: An English Perspective
title_sort decision-making behaviour under the mental health act 1983 and its impact on mental health tribunals: an english perspective
publisher MDPI AG
series Laws
issn 2075-471X
publishDate 2018-03-01
description In England and Wales, the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) provides the legal framework which governs decisions made concerning the care and treatment of those suffering from mental disorders, where they may pose a risk to themselves or others. The perspective of the patient and the care provider may conflict and can be a source of tension and challenge within mental health law. Through access to a mental health tribunal, patients are offered the apparatus to review and challenge their detention. With detention rates under the mental health legislation rising exponentially, this is having a knock-on effect upon tribunal application numbers. As there is a legal requirement to review all cases of individuals detained under the MHA 1983, understanding the key drivers for this increase in detention is essential in order to understand how to better manage both detention rates and the upsurge in tribunal caseloads. With the increase in overall activity, mental health tribunal workloads present significant practical challenges and has downstream cost implications.
topic detention
caseload
mental health tribunal
Mental Health Act 1983
decision-making
risk
costs
url http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/2/12
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolagloverthomas decisionmakingbehaviourunderthementalhealthact1983anditsimpactonmentalhealthtribunalsanenglishperspective
_version_ 1716767731085213696