Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose.
Two of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines currently approved in the United States require 2 doses, administered 3 to 4 weeks apart. Constraints in vaccine supply and distribution capacity, together with a deadly wave of COVID-19 from November 2020 to January 2021 and the emergence of h...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-04-01
|
Series: | PLoS Biology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001211 |
id |
doaj-c981d685066a4430b550861909eabd5c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c981d685066a4430b550861909eabd5c2021-07-02T18:59:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852021-04-01194e300121110.1371/journal.pbio.3001211Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose.Seyed M MoghadasThomas N VilchesKevin ZhangShokoofeh NourbakhshPratha SahMeagan C FitzpatrickAlison P GalvaniTwo of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines currently approved in the United States require 2 doses, administered 3 to 4 weeks apart. Constraints in vaccine supply and distribution capacity, together with a deadly wave of COVID-19 from November 2020 to January 2021 and the emergence of highly contagious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, sparked a policy debate on whether to vaccinate more individuals with the first dose of available vaccines and delay the second dose or to continue with the recommended 2-dose series as tested in clinical trials. We developed an agent-based model of COVID-19 transmission to compare the impact of these 2 vaccination strategies, while varying the temporal waning of vaccine efficacy following the first dose and the level of preexisting immunity in the population. Our results show that for Moderna vaccines, a delay of at least 9 weeks could maximize vaccination program effectiveness and avert at least an additional 17.3 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 7.8-29.7) infections, 0.69 (95% CrI: 0.52-0.97) hospitalizations, and 0.34 (95% CrI: 0.25-0.44) deaths per 10,000 population compared to the recommended 4-week interval between the 2 doses. Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines also averted an additional 0.60 (95% CrI: 0.37-0.89) hospitalizations and 0.32 (95% CrI: 0.23-0.45) deaths per 10,000 population in a 9-week delayed second dose (DSD) strategy compared to the 3-week recommended schedule between doses. However, there was no clear advantage of delaying the second dose with Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines in reducing infections, unless the efficacy of the first dose did not wane over time. Our findings underscore the importance of quantifying the characteristics and durability of vaccine-induced protection after the first dose in order to determine the optimal time interval between the 2 doses.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001211 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Seyed M Moghadas Thomas N Vilches Kevin Zhang Shokoofeh Nourbakhsh Pratha Sah Meagan C Fitzpatrick Alison P Galvani |
spellingShingle |
Seyed M Moghadas Thomas N Vilches Kevin Zhang Shokoofeh Nourbakhsh Pratha Sah Meagan C Fitzpatrick Alison P Galvani Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose. PLoS Biology |
author_facet |
Seyed M Moghadas Thomas N Vilches Kevin Zhang Shokoofeh Nourbakhsh Pratha Sah Meagan C Fitzpatrick Alison P Galvani |
author_sort |
Seyed M Moghadas |
title |
Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose. |
title_short |
Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose. |
title_full |
Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose. |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose. |
title_sort |
evaluation of covid-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS Biology |
issn |
1544-9173 1545-7885 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Two of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines currently approved in the United States require 2 doses, administered 3 to 4 weeks apart. Constraints in vaccine supply and distribution capacity, together with a deadly wave of COVID-19 from November 2020 to January 2021 and the emergence of highly contagious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, sparked a policy debate on whether to vaccinate more individuals with the first dose of available vaccines and delay the second dose or to continue with the recommended 2-dose series as tested in clinical trials. We developed an agent-based model of COVID-19 transmission to compare the impact of these 2 vaccination strategies, while varying the temporal waning of vaccine efficacy following the first dose and the level of preexisting immunity in the population. Our results show that for Moderna vaccines, a delay of at least 9 weeks could maximize vaccination program effectiveness and avert at least an additional 17.3 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 7.8-29.7) infections, 0.69 (95% CrI: 0.52-0.97) hospitalizations, and 0.34 (95% CrI: 0.25-0.44) deaths per 10,000 population compared to the recommended 4-week interval between the 2 doses. Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines also averted an additional 0.60 (95% CrI: 0.37-0.89) hospitalizations and 0.32 (95% CrI: 0.23-0.45) deaths per 10,000 population in a 9-week delayed second dose (DSD) strategy compared to the 3-week recommended schedule between doses. However, there was no clear advantage of delaying the second dose with Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines in reducing infections, unless the efficacy of the first dose did not wane over time. Our findings underscore the importance of quantifying the characteristics and durability of vaccine-induced protection after the first dose in order to determine the optimal time interval between the 2 doses. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001211 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT seyedmmoghadas evaluationofcovid19vaccinationstrategieswithadelayedseconddose AT thomasnvilches evaluationofcovid19vaccinationstrategieswithadelayedseconddose AT kevinzhang evaluationofcovid19vaccinationstrategieswithadelayedseconddose AT shokoofehnourbakhsh evaluationofcovid19vaccinationstrategieswithadelayedseconddose AT prathasah evaluationofcovid19vaccinationstrategieswithadelayedseconddose AT meagancfitzpatrick evaluationofcovid19vaccinationstrategieswithadelayedseconddose AT alisonpgalvani evaluationofcovid19vaccinationstrategieswithadelayedseconddose |
_version_ |
1721324376010260480 |