Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study

Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to asses & compare the load transfer characteristics of Ball/O-ring and Bar/Clip attachment systems in implant supported overdentures using analog and finite element analysis models. Methodology: For the analog part of the study, castable bar was u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soumyadev Satpathy, C L Satish Babu, Shilpa Shetty, Bharat Raj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.j-ips.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4052;year=2015;volume=15;issue=3;spage=250;epage=256;aulast=Satpathy
id doaj-c970465320f64ef6a83db3c104bf442b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c970465320f64ef6a83db3c104bf442b2020-11-24T23:10:35ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsThe Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society0972-40521998-40572015-01-0115325025610.4103/0972-4052.165324Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro studySoumyadev SatpathyC L Satish BabuShilpa ShettyBharat RajAims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to asses & compare the load transfer characteristics of Ball/O-ring and Bar/Clip attachment systems in implant supported overdentures using analog and finite element analysis models. Methodology: For the analog part of the study, castable bar was used for the bar and clip attachment and a metallic housing with a rubber O-ring component was used for the ball/O-ring attachment. The stress on the implant surface was measured using the strain-gauge technique. For the finite element analysis, the model were fabricated and load applications were done in a similar manner as in analog study. Results: The difference between both the attachment systems was found to be statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion: Ball/O-ring attachment system transmitted lesser amount of stresses to the implants on the non-loading side, as compared to the Bar-Clip attachment system. When overall stress distribution is compared, the Bar-Clip attachment seems to perform better than the Ball/O-ring attachment, because the force was distributed better.http://www.j-ips.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4052;year=2015;volume=15;issue=3;spage=250;epage=256;aulast=SatpathyBall/O-ringBar-Clipfinite element analysisimplant retained overdentureoverdenture attachmentsstrain gauges
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Soumyadev Satpathy
C L Satish Babu
Shilpa Shetty
Bharat Raj
spellingShingle Soumyadev Satpathy
C L Satish Babu
Shilpa Shetty
Bharat Raj
Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
Ball/O-ring
Bar-Clip
finite element analysis
implant retained overdenture
overdenture attachments
strain gauges
author_facet Soumyadev Satpathy
C L Satish Babu
Shilpa Shetty
Bharat Raj
author_sort Soumyadev Satpathy
title Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
title_short Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
title_full Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
title_fullStr Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
title_sort stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: a comparative in-vitro study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
issn 0972-4052
1998-4057
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to asses & compare the load transfer characteristics of Ball/O-ring and Bar/Clip attachment systems in implant supported overdentures using analog and finite element analysis models. Methodology: For the analog part of the study, castable bar was used for the bar and clip attachment and a metallic housing with a rubber O-ring component was used for the ball/O-ring attachment. The stress on the implant surface was measured using the strain-gauge technique. For the finite element analysis, the model were fabricated and load applications were done in a similar manner as in analog study. Results: The difference between both the attachment systems was found to be statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion: Ball/O-ring attachment system transmitted lesser amount of stresses to the implants on the non-loading side, as compared to the Bar-Clip attachment system. When overall stress distribution is compared, the Bar-Clip attachment seems to perform better than the Ball/O-ring attachment, because the force was distributed better.
topic Ball/O-ring
Bar-Clip
finite element analysis
implant retained overdenture
overdenture attachments
strain gauges
url http://www.j-ips.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4052;year=2015;volume=15;issue=3;spage=250;epage=256;aulast=Satpathy
work_keys_str_mv AT soumyadevsatpathy stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT clsatishbabu stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT shilpashetty stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT bharatraj stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy
_version_ 1725606564697473024