What does the literature say about resilience in refugee people? Implications for practice

Refugee people experience many trials prior to arriving in Australia and face ongoing challenges associated with re-settlement. Despite facing such difficulties many refugee people demonstrate enormous strength and resilience that facilitates their re-settlement process. The authors’ experience howe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mary Hutchinson, Pat Dorsett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Griffith University 2012-12-01
Series:Journal of Social Inclusion
Online Access:https://josi.journals.griffith.edu.au/index.php/inclusion/article/view/206
id doaj-c95c826e10e442aab87587ef50940e4b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c95c826e10e442aab87587ef50940e4b2020-11-25T02:38:25ZengGriffith UniversityJournal of Social Inclusion1836-88082012-12-01325578184What does the literature say about resilience in refugee people? Implications for practiceMary HutchinsonPat DorsettRefugee people experience many trials prior to arriving in Australia and face ongoing challenges associated with re-settlement. Despite facing such difficulties many refugee people demonstrate enormous strength and resilience that facilitates their re-settlement process. The authors’ experience however suggests that professionals working with refugee people tend to focus on the trauma story to the neglect of their strengths. At times this means resilience is overshadowed by a dominant Western deficits model that defines refugee people as traumatised victims. Pathologising the trauma story of refugee people may further alienate refugee people from full inclusion into Australian life by denying their inherent resilience in the face of extraordinary life experiences. This article reviews Australian and International literature to explore factors that contribute to refugee resilience such as personal qualities, support and religion. The review also identifies elements that may impede resilience including; language barriers, racism, discrimination, and labelling the trauma story. The literature suggests refugee resilience moves beyond the Western individualised notion of resilience to a more communal construction of resilience that includes refugee people’s broader social context. The literature highlights important practice implications and the authors respond to the findings by reflecting on their own practice experience and considering implications for a more inclusive anti-oppressive strengths-based approach to work with refugee people. Keywords: refugee, resilience, strengths, traumahttps://josi.journals.griffith.edu.au/index.php/inclusion/article/view/206
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mary Hutchinson
Pat Dorsett
spellingShingle Mary Hutchinson
Pat Dorsett
What does the literature say about resilience in refugee people? Implications for practice
Journal of Social Inclusion
author_facet Mary Hutchinson
Pat Dorsett
author_sort Mary Hutchinson
title What does the literature say about resilience in refugee people? Implications for practice
title_short What does the literature say about resilience in refugee people? Implications for practice
title_full What does the literature say about resilience in refugee people? Implications for practice
title_fullStr What does the literature say about resilience in refugee people? Implications for practice
title_full_unstemmed What does the literature say about resilience in refugee people? Implications for practice
title_sort what does the literature say about resilience in refugee people? implications for practice
publisher Griffith University
series Journal of Social Inclusion
issn 1836-8808
publishDate 2012-12-01
description Refugee people experience many trials prior to arriving in Australia and face ongoing challenges associated with re-settlement. Despite facing such difficulties many refugee people demonstrate enormous strength and resilience that facilitates their re-settlement process. The authors’ experience however suggests that professionals working with refugee people tend to focus on the trauma story to the neglect of their strengths. At times this means resilience is overshadowed by a dominant Western deficits model that defines refugee people as traumatised victims. Pathologising the trauma story of refugee people may further alienate refugee people from full inclusion into Australian life by denying their inherent resilience in the face of extraordinary life experiences. This article reviews Australian and International literature to explore factors that contribute to refugee resilience such as personal qualities, support and religion. The review also identifies elements that may impede resilience including; language barriers, racism, discrimination, and labelling the trauma story. The literature suggests refugee resilience moves beyond the Western individualised notion of resilience to a more communal construction of resilience that includes refugee people’s broader social context. The literature highlights important practice implications and the authors respond to the findings by reflecting on their own practice experience and considering implications for a more inclusive anti-oppressive strengths-based approach to work with refugee people. Keywords: refugee, resilience, strengths, trauma
url https://josi.journals.griffith.edu.au/index.php/inclusion/article/view/206
work_keys_str_mv AT maryhutchinson whatdoestheliteraturesayaboutresilienceinrefugeepeopleimplicationsforpractice
AT patdorsett whatdoestheliteraturesayaboutresilienceinrefugeepeopleimplicationsforpractice
_version_ 1724791001730514944