Multihoming vs. Single-Homing Software: Compatibility or Competition?
Compatibility or competition is a key strategic decision for multihoming software developers. Compatibility is a strategy by which companies set up their software to be more compatible with their competitors' products, while competition is an opposite strategy by which the companies set up thei...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2021-01-01
|
Series: | IEEE Access |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9288774/ |
id |
doaj-c938a1637189459098b9e823eae12ac7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c938a1637189459098b9e823eae12ac72021-03-30T15:10:45ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362021-01-019241192413210.1109/ACCESS.2020.30436449288774Multihoming vs. Single-Homing Software: Compatibility or Competition?Shidao Geng0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-1247Jingpei Ma1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7106-0703Cong Wang2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8222-2867Feng Liu3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-1582School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, ChinaSchool of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, ChinaSchool of Management Science and Engineering, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, ChinaCompatibility or competition is a key strategic decision for multihoming software developers. Compatibility is a strategy by which companies set up their software to be more compatible with their competitors' products, while competition is an opposite strategy by which the companies set up their software without any compatibility. We study the strategic decision of a multihoming software company that competes with two firms on different operating systems, (such as Windows and Mac). By formalizing a game-theoretic model to capture the motivation of a multihoming software developer, we find that the compatibility strategy is mainly incentivized by the trade-off between the spillover effect and the compatibility cost. We then solve for reasonable software prices and compatibility level given the market potential from the software firms' perspective. Several managerial guidelines are obtained to determine the optimal decision in the software development economy. Interestingly, when both the spillover effect and the compatibility cost are low enough, the multihoming software firm still chooses the competing strategy. Finally, by reporting the numerical analysis, we verify the effectiveness of the theoretical results derived in our model.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9288774/Software development managementcompatibilityprofitabilityspillover effect |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shidao Geng Jingpei Ma Cong Wang Feng Liu |
spellingShingle |
Shidao Geng Jingpei Ma Cong Wang Feng Liu Multihoming vs. Single-Homing Software: Compatibility or Competition? IEEE Access Software development management compatibility profitability spillover effect |
author_facet |
Shidao Geng Jingpei Ma Cong Wang Feng Liu |
author_sort |
Shidao Geng |
title |
Multihoming vs. Single-Homing Software: Compatibility or Competition? |
title_short |
Multihoming vs. Single-Homing Software: Compatibility or Competition? |
title_full |
Multihoming vs. Single-Homing Software: Compatibility or Competition? |
title_fullStr |
Multihoming vs. Single-Homing Software: Compatibility or Competition? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multihoming vs. Single-Homing Software: Compatibility or Competition? |
title_sort |
multihoming vs. single-homing software: compatibility or competition? |
publisher |
IEEE |
series |
IEEE Access |
issn |
2169-3536 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Compatibility or competition is a key strategic decision for multihoming software developers. Compatibility is a strategy by which companies set up their software to be more compatible with their competitors' products, while competition is an opposite strategy by which the companies set up their software without any compatibility. We study the strategic decision of a multihoming software company that competes with two firms on different operating systems, (such as Windows and Mac). By formalizing a game-theoretic model to capture the motivation of a multihoming software developer, we find that the compatibility strategy is mainly incentivized by the trade-off between the spillover effect and the compatibility cost. We then solve for reasonable software prices and compatibility level given the market potential from the software firms' perspective. Several managerial guidelines are obtained to determine the optimal decision in the software development economy. Interestingly, when both the spillover effect and the compatibility cost are low enough, the multihoming software firm still chooses the competing strategy. Finally, by reporting the numerical analysis, we verify the effectiveness of the theoretical results derived in our model. |
topic |
Software development management compatibility profitability spillover effect |
url |
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9288774/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shidaogeng multihomingvssinglehomingsoftwarecompatibilityorcompetition AT jingpeima multihomingvssinglehomingsoftwarecompatibilityorcompetition AT congwang multihomingvssinglehomingsoftwarecompatibilityorcompetition AT fengliu multihomingvssinglehomingsoftwarecompatibilityorcompetition |
_version_ |
1724179915781177344 |