Evaluating Changes in Clinical Decision-Making in Physical Therapy Students After Participating in Simulation

Purpose: Physical therapy students are not consistently prepared to practice in the dynamic healthcare environment immediately after graduation. Implementing other teaching modalities may help to better prepare physical therapy graduates. Medical and nursing student education have effectively used s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kelly Macauley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-12-01
Series:Health Professions Education
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452301117301475
id doaj-c93856eb0dfe456d8bee447594c0718e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c93856eb0dfe456d8bee447594c0718e2020-11-24T21:24:38ZengElsevierHealth Professions Education2452-30112018-12-0144278286Evaluating Changes in Clinical Decision-Making in Physical Therapy Students After Participating in SimulationKelly Macauley0Corresponding author.; College of Health and Education, Husson University, 1 College Circle, Bangor, ME 04401, USAPurpose: Physical therapy students are not consistently prepared to practice in the dynamic healthcare environment immediately after graduation. Implementing other teaching modalities may help to better prepare physical therapy graduates. Medical and nursing student education have effectively used simulation to help prepare students for clinical practice. The purpose of the quasi-experimental design study was to assess the effect of simulation on clinical decision-making (CDM) in Doctor of Physical students in a physical therapy program. Methods: One-hundred and twenty-two students in two class years participated in the study, with 71 partaking in a simulation activity and 51 students serving as the control. The first-year students participated in a task trainer simulation and the second-year students completed a hybrid simulation. The students’ CDM was measured prior to and after completing the simulation. Results: The results demonstrated that the students who participated in simulation had statistically significantly higher scores on the CDM Tool than the students who did participate in simulation. The results also further validated the CDM Tool by demonstrating that second year students had significantly higher scores on the CDM Tool than first year students at both time points. Discussion: Students demonstrated statistically significant changes in CDM after participating in one simulation experience. Further research is required to replicated these results and determine the optimal dosage of simulation experiences for long-term learning. Keywords: Assessment, Clinical decision-making, Education, Physical therapy, Simulationhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452301117301475
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kelly Macauley
spellingShingle Kelly Macauley
Evaluating Changes in Clinical Decision-Making in Physical Therapy Students After Participating in Simulation
Health Professions Education
author_facet Kelly Macauley
author_sort Kelly Macauley
title Evaluating Changes in Clinical Decision-Making in Physical Therapy Students After Participating in Simulation
title_short Evaluating Changes in Clinical Decision-Making in Physical Therapy Students After Participating in Simulation
title_full Evaluating Changes in Clinical Decision-Making in Physical Therapy Students After Participating in Simulation
title_fullStr Evaluating Changes in Clinical Decision-Making in Physical Therapy Students After Participating in Simulation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Changes in Clinical Decision-Making in Physical Therapy Students After Participating in Simulation
title_sort evaluating changes in clinical decision-making in physical therapy students after participating in simulation
publisher Elsevier
series Health Professions Education
issn 2452-3011
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Purpose: Physical therapy students are not consistently prepared to practice in the dynamic healthcare environment immediately after graduation. Implementing other teaching modalities may help to better prepare physical therapy graduates. Medical and nursing student education have effectively used simulation to help prepare students for clinical practice. The purpose of the quasi-experimental design study was to assess the effect of simulation on clinical decision-making (CDM) in Doctor of Physical students in a physical therapy program. Methods: One-hundred and twenty-two students in two class years participated in the study, with 71 partaking in a simulation activity and 51 students serving as the control. The first-year students participated in a task trainer simulation and the second-year students completed a hybrid simulation. The students’ CDM was measured prior to and after completing the simulation. Results: The results demonstrated that the students who participated in simulation had statistically significantly higher scores on the CDM Tool than the students who did participate in simulation. The results also further validated the CDM Tool by demonstrating that second year students had significantly higher scores on the CDM Tool than first year students at both time points. Discussion: Students demonstrated statistically significant changes in CDM after participating in one simulation experience. Further research is required to replicated these results and determine the optimal dosage of simulation experiences for long-term learning. Keywords: Assessment, Clinical decision-making, Education, Physical therapy, Simulation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452301117301475
work_keys_str_mv AT kellymacauley evaluatingchangesinclinicaldecisionmakinginphysicaltherapystudentsafterparticipatinginsimulation
_version_ 1725987166975164416