Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective

The text deals with the existing ethical tension between decision-making on behalf of people with intellectual disabilities and substitute decision-making, and the duty-bound respect for the person’s autonomy. The work begins by distinguishing decision- making on behalf of someone and substitute dec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Xabier ETXEBERRIA MAULEON
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad de Salamanca 2016-11-01
Series:Siglo Cero
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0210-1696/article/view/15284
id doaj-c934d0dbe5124709ab4d226f8c53d9f7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c934d0dbe5124709ab4d226f8c53d9f72020-11-25T02:40:50ZspaUniversidad de SalamancaSiglo Cero0210-16962530-03502016-11-01471556610.14201/scero20161556613628Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical PerspectiveXabier ETXEBERRIA MAULEON0Universidad de DeustoThe text deals with the existing ethical tension between decision-making on behalf of people with intellectual disabilities and substitute decision-making, and the duty-bound respect for the person’s autonomy. The work begins by distinguishing decision- making on behalf of someone and substitute decision-making, consequently favoring the latter, as well as relating autonomy to interdependence. This first clarification leads to the construction of a basic and general criterion for substitute decision-making practice. The reflection continues analyzing three main issues implied in the criteria: the definition of the insuperable limitation of decision-making capacity, the content of substitute decision-making and the subjects who exercise decision-making. The selected methodology for this second part is mainly based on a conceptual definition aimed to enable practice. Specific criteria and orientation may be withdrawn from this analysis in order to practice substitute decision-making ethically, specifically considering the will of the person with intellectual disability.https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0210-1696/article/view/15284autonomíadecisiones de representación/sustituciónpersonas con discapacidad intelectualcapacidad de decisiónrespetoautenticidadsujetos de decisión.
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xabier ETXEBERRIA MAULEON
spellingShingle Xabier ETXEBERRIA MAULEON
Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective
Siglo Cero
autonomía
decisiones de representación/sustitución
personas con discapacidad intelectual
capacidad de decisión
respeto
autenticidad
sujetos de decisión.
author_facet Xabier ETXEBERRIA MAULEON
author_sort Xabier ETXEBERRIA MAULEON
title Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective
title_short Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective
title_full Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective
title_fullStr Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective
title_sort autonomy and substitute decision-making with people with intellectual disabilities. ethical perspective
publisher Universidad de Salamanca
series Siglo Cero
issn 0210-1696
2530-0350
publishDate 2016-11-01
description The text deals with the existing ethical tension between decision-making on behalf of people with intellectual disabilities and substitute decision-making, and the duty-bound respect for the person’s autonomy. The work begins by distinguishing decision- making on behalf of someone and substitute decision-making, consequently favoring the latter, as well as relating autonomy to interdependence. This first clarification leads to the construction of a basic and general criterion for substitute decision-making practice. The reflection continues analyzing three main issues implied in the criteria: the definition of the insuperable limitation of decision-making capacity, the content of substitute decision-making and the subjects who exercise decision-making. The selected methodology for this second part is mainly based on a conceptual definition aimed to enable practice. Specific criteria and orientation may be withdrawn from this analysis in order to practice substitute decision-making ethically, specifically considering the will of the person with intellectual disability.
topic autonomía
decisiones de representación/sustitución
personas con discapacidad intelectual
capacidad de decisión
respeto
autenticidad
sujetos de decisión.
url https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0210-1696/article/view/15284
work_keys_str_mv AT xabieretxeberriamauleon autonomyandsubstitutedecisionmakingwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesethicalperspective
_version_ 1724779571411156992