Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective
The text deals with the existing ethical tension between decision-making on behalf of people with intellectual disabilities and substitute decision-making, and the duty-bound respect for the person’s autonomy. The work begins by distinguishing decision- making on behalf of someone and substitute dec...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad de Salamanca
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Siglo Cero |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0210-1696/article/view/15284 |
id |
doaj-c934d0dbe5124709ab4d226f8c53d9f7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c934d0dbe5124709ab4d226f8c53d9f72020-11-25T02:40:50ZspaUniversidad de SalamancaSiglo Cero0210-16962530-03502016-11-01471556610.14201/scero20161556613628Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical PerspectiveXabier ETXEBERRIA MAULEON0Universidad de DeustoThe text deals with the existing ethical tension between decision-making on behalf of people with intellectual disabilities and substitute decision-making, and the duty-bound respect for the person’s autonomy. The work begins by distinguishing decision- making on behalf of someone and substitute decision-making, consequently favoring the latter, as well as relating autonomy to interdependence. This first clarification leads to the construction of a basic and general criterion for substitute decision-making practice. The reflection continues analyzing three main issues implied in the criteria: the definition of the insuperable limitation of decision-making capacity, the content of substitute decision-making and the subjects who exercise decision-making. The selected methodology for this second part is mainly based on a conceptual definition aimed to enable practice. Specific criteria and orientation may be withdrawn from this analysis in order to practice substitute decision-making ethically, specifically considering the will of the person with intellectual disability.https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0210-1696/article/view/15284autonomíadecisiones de representación/sustituciónpersonas con discapacidad intelectualcapacidad de decisiónrespetoautenticidadsujetos de decisión. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xabier ETXEBERRIA MAULEON |
spellingShingle |
Xabier ETXEBERRIA MAULEON Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective Siglo Cero autonomía decisiones de representación/sustitución personas con discapacidad intelectual capacidad de decisión respeto autenticidad sujetos de decisión. |
author_facet |
Xabier ETXEBERRIA MAULEON |
author_sort |
Xabier ETXEBERRIA MAULEON |
title |
Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective |
title_short |
Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective |
title_full |
Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective |
title_fullStr |
Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Autonomy and Substitute Decision-Making with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethical Perspective |
title_sort |
autonomy and substitute decision-making with people with intellectual disabilities. ethical perspective |
publisher |
Universidad de Salamanca |
series |
Siglo Cero |
issn |
0210-1696 2530-0350 |
publishDate |
2016-11-01 |
description |
The text deals with the existing ethical tension between decision-making on behalf of people with intellectual disabilities and substitute decision-making, and the duty-bound respect for the person’s autonomy. The work begins by distinguishing decision- making on behalf of someone and substitute decision-making, consequently favoring the latter, as well as relating autonomy to interdependence. This first clarification leads to the construction of a basic and general criterion for substitute decision-making practice. The reflection continues analyzing three main issues implied in the criteria: the definition of the insuperable limitation of decision-making capacity, the content of substitute decision-making and the subjects who exercise decision-making. The selected methodology for this second part is mainly based on a conceptual definition aimed to enable practice. Specific criteria and orientation may be withdrawn from this analysis in order to practice substitute decision-making ethically, specifically considering the will of the person with intellectual disability. |
topic |
autonomía decisiones de representación/sustitución personas con discapacidad intelectual capacidad de decisión respeto autenticidad sujetos de decisión. |
url |
https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0210-1696/article/view/15284 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xabieretxeberriamauleon autonomyandsubstitutedecisionmakingwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesethicalperspective |
_version_ |
1724779571411156992 |