The distribution of referential adjectives in psych nominalizations in English and Romanian

Previous accounts of referential adjectives have examined their status in the structure of action nominalizations in correlation with the event vs. result interpretation of nominals. They have been argued to behave like noun phrases (Grimshaw 1990), to introduce new entities into the discourse (Gior...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Camelia Bejan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti 2007-01-01
Series:Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/index.pl/the_distribution_of_referential_adjectives_in_psych_nominalizations_in_english_and_romanian
id doaj-c92fbdd5e455430fa7b42ab5a203297b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c92fbdd5e455430fa7b42ab5a203297b2020-11-24T22:52:44ZengEditura Universitatii din BucurestiBucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 2069-92392007-01-01IX1137147The distribution of referential adjectives in psych nominalizations in English and RomanianCamelia BejanPrevious accounts of referential adjectives have examined their status in the structure of action nominalizations in correlation with the event vs. result interpretation of nominals. They have been argued to behave like noun phrases (Grimshaw 1990), to introduce new entities into the discourse (Giorgi and Longobardi 1991) or to simply modify deverbal nominals (Oersnes and Markantonatou 2002). This paper attempts a comparative study of referential adjectives in psychological nominalizations in English and Romanian. We argue that the restrictions on the occurrence of referential adjectives in psych nominalizations are imposed by the language specific functional structure of the DP. The paper is organized as follows. In section one we briefly overview the literature on referential adjectives in action nominalizations. In section two we look at the distribution of referential adjectives in psychological nominalizations and in section three we correlate modification by referential adjectives with the process vs. result interpretation of psych nominals. http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/index.pl/the_distribution_of_referential_adjectives_in_psych_nominalizations_in_english_and_romanianreferential adjectivenominalizationprocessresultEnglishRomanian
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Camelia Bejan
spellingShingle Camelia Bejan
The distribution of referential adjectives in psych nominalizations in English and Romanian
Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics
referential adjective
nominalization
process
result
English
Romanian
author_facet Camelia Bejan
author_sort Camelia Bejan
title The distribution of referential adjectives in psych nominalizations in English and Romanian
title_short The distribution of referential adjectives in psych nominalizations in English and Romanian
title_full The distribution of referential adjectives in psych nominalizations in English and Romanian
title_fullStr The distribution of referential adjectives in psych nominalizations in English and Romanian
title_full_unstemmed The distribution of referential adjectives in psych nominalizations in English and Romanian
title_sort distribution of referential adjectives in psych nominalizations in english and romanian
publisher Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti
series Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics
issn 2069-9239
publishDate 2007-01-01
description Previous accounts of referential adjectives have examined their status in the structure of action nominalizations in correlation with the event vs. result interpretation of nominals. They have been argued to behave like noun phrases (Grimshaw 1990), to introduce new entities into the discourse (Giorgi and Longobardi 1991) or to simply modify deverbal nominals (Oersnes and Markantonatou 2002). This paper attempts a comparative study of referential adjectives in psychological nominalizations in English and Romanian. We argue that the restrictions on the occurrence of referential adjectives in psych nominalizations are imposed by the language specific functional structure of the DP. The paper is organized as follows. In section one we briefly overview the literature on referential adjectives in action nominalizations. In section two we look at the distribution of referential adjectives in psychological nominalizations and in section three we correlate modification by referential adjectives with the process vs. result interpretation of psych nominals.
topic referential adjective
nominalization
process
result
English
Romanian
url http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/index.pl/the_distribution_of_referential_adjectives_in_psych_nominalizations_in_english_and_romanian
work_keys_str_mv AT cameliabejan thedistributionofreferentialadjectivesinpsychnominalizationsinenglishandromanian
AT cameliabejan distributionofreferentialadjectivesinpsychnominalizationsinenglishandromanian
_version_ 1725664642835939328