The Effect of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Valence on Limited Attentional Resources During Deception: An ERPs Study

Deception is a complex and cognitively draining dyadic process that simultaneously involves cognitive and emotional processes, both of which demand/capture attentional resources. However, few studies have investigated the allocation of attentional resources between cognitive and emotional processes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing Liang, Qian-Nan Ruan, Ke-Ke Fu, Yu-Hsin Chen, Wen-Jing Yan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
ERP
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.698877/full
id doaj-c9232d37708447b8abffed3e928bb257
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9232d37708447b8abffed3e928bb2572021-10-06T04:48:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2021-10-011510.3389/fnins.2021.698877698877The Effect of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Valence on Limited Attentional Resources During Deception: An ERPs StudyJing Liang0Qian-Nan Ruan1Ke-Ke Fu2Yu-Hsin Chen3Wen-Jing Yan4School of Educational Science, Ludong University, Yantai, ChinaWenzhou Seventh People’s Hospital, Wenzhou, ChinaSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan, ChinaCollege of Liberal Arts, Wenzhou-Kean University, Wenzhou, ChinaSchool of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, ChinaDeception is a complex and cognitively draining dyadic process that simultaneously involves cognitive and emotional processes, both of which demand/capture attentional resources. However, few studies have investigated the allocation of attentional resources between cognitive and emotional processes during deception. The current study presented facial expressions of different valences to 36 participants. While an electroencephalogram was recording, they were asked to make either truthful or deceptive gender judgments according to preceding cues. The results showed that deceptive responses induced smaller P300 amplitudes than did truthful responses. Task-irrelevant negative emotional information (TiN) elicited larger P300 amplitudes than did task-irrelevant positive emotional information (TiP). Furthermore, the results showed that TiN elicited larger LPP amplitudes than did TiP in deceptive responses, but not in truthful ones. The results suggested that attentional resources were directed away to deception-related cognitive processes and TiN, but not TiP, was consistently able to compete for and obtain attentional resources during deception. The results indicated that TiN could disrupt with deception and may facilitate deception detection.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.698877/fulldeceptionemotional valencetask relevanceattentional resourcesERP
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jing Liang
Qian-Nan Ruan
Ke-Ke Fu
Yu-Hsin Chen
Wen-Jing Yan
spellingShingle Jing Liang
Qian-Nan Ruan
Ke-Ke Fu
Yu-Hsin Chen
Wen-Jing Yan
The Effect of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Valence on Limited Attentional Resources During Deception: An ERPs Study
Frontiers in Neuroscience
deception
emotional valence
task relevance
attentional resources
ERP
author_facet Jing Liang
Qian-Nan Ruan
Ke-Ke Fu
Yu-Hsin Chen
Wen-Jing Yan
author_sort Jing Liang
title The Effect of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Valence on Limited Attentional Resources During Deception: An ERPs Study
title_short The Effect of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Valence on Limited Attentional Resources During Deception: An ERPs Study
title_full The Effect of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Valence on Limited Attentional Resources During Deception: An ERPs Study
title_fullStr The Effect of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Valence on Limited Attentional Resources During Deception: An ERPs Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Valence on Limited Attentional Resources During Deception: An ERPs Study
title_sort effect of task-irrelevant emotional valence on limited attentional resources during deception: an erps study
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2021-10-01
description Deception is a complex and cognitively draining dyadic process that simultaneously involves cognitive and emotional processes, both of which demand/capture attentional resources. However, few studies have investigated the allocation of attentional resources between cognitive and emotional processes during deception. The current study presented facial expressions of different valences to 36 participants. While an electroencephalogram was recording, they were asked to make either truthful or deceptive gender judgments according to preceding cues. The results showed that deceptive responses induced smaller P300 amplitudes than did truthful responses. Task-irrelevant negative emotional information (TiN) elicited larger P300 amplitudes than did task-irrelevant positive emotional information (TiP). Furthermore, the results showed that TiN elicited larger LPP amplitudes than did TiP in deceptive responses, but not in truthful ones. The results suggested that attentional resources were directed away to deception-related cognitive processes and TiN, but not TiP, was consistently able to compete for and obtain attentional resources during deception. The results indicated that TiN could disrupt with deception and may facilitate deception detection.
topic deception
emotional valence
task relevance
attentional resources
ERP
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.698877/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jingliang theeffectoftaskirrelevantemotionalvalenceonlimitedattentionalresourcesduringdeceptionanerpsstudy
AT qiannanruan theeffectoftaskirrelevantemotionalvalenceonlimitedattentionalresourcesduringdeceptionanerpsstudy
AT kekefu theeffectoftaskirrelevantemotionalvalenceonlimitedattentionalresourcesduringdeceptionanerpsstudy
AT yuhsinchen theeffectoftaskirrelevantemotionalvalenceonlimitedattentionalresourcesduringdeceptionanerpsstudy
AT wenjingyan theeffectoftaskirrelevantemotionalvalenceonlimitedattentionalresourcesduringdeceptionanerpsstudy
AT jingliang effectoftaskirrelevantemotionalvalenceonlimitedattentionalresourcesduringdeceptionanerpsstudy
AT qiannanruan effectoftaskirrelevantemotionalvalenceonlimitedattentionalresourcesduringdeceptionanerpsstudy
AT kekefu effectoftaskirrelevantemotionalvalenceonlimitedattentionalresourcesduringdeceptionanerpsstudy
AT yuhsinchen effectoftaskirrelevantemotionalvalenceonlimitedattentionalresourcesduringdeceptionanerpsstudy
AT wenjingyan effectoftaskirrelevantemotionalvalenceonlimitedattentionalresourcesduringdeceptionanerpsstudy
_version_ 1716841408189431808