Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.
Operating a body-powered prosthesis can be painful and tiring due to high cable operation forces, illustrating that low cable operation forces are a desirable design property for body-powered prostheses. However, lower operation forces might negatively affect controllability and force perception, wh...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225263 |
id |
doaj-c919a04efe014c8d90b84fa7045f2522 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c919a04efe014c8d90b84fa7045f25222021-03-03T21:15:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011411e022526310.1371/journal.pone.0225263Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.Mona HichertDavid A AbbinkAlistair N VardyCorry K van der SluisWim G M JanssenMichael A H BrouwersDick H PlettenburgOperating a body-powered prosthesis can be painful and tiring due to high cable operation forces, illustrating that low cable operation forces are a desirable design property for body-powered prostheses. However, lower operation forces might negatively affect controllability and force perception, which is plausible but not known. This study aims to quantify the accuracy of cable force perception and control for body-powered prostheses in a low cable operation force range by utilizing isometric and dynamic force reproduction experiments. Twenty-five subjects with trans-radial absence conducted two force reproduction tasks; first an isometric task of reproducing 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 or 40 N and second a force reproduction task of 10 and 20 N, for cable excursions of 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 mm. Task performance was quantified by the force reproduction error and the variability in the generated force. The results of the isometric experiment demonstrated that increasing force levels enlarge the force variability, but do not influence the force reproduction error for the tested force range. The second experiment showed that increased cable excursions resulted in a decreased force reproduction error, for both tested force levels, whereas the force variability remained unchanged. In conclusion, the design recommendations for voluntary closing body-powered prostheses suggested by this study are to minimize cable operation forces: this does not affect force reproduction error but does reduce force variability. Furthermore, increased cable excursions facilitate users with additional information to meet a target force more accurately.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225263 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mona Hichert David A Abbink Alistair N Vardy Corry K van der Sluis Wim G M Janssen Michael A H Brouwers Dick H Plettenburg |
spellingShingle |
Mona Hichert David A Abbink Alistair N Vardy Corry K van der Sluis Wim G M Janssen Michael A H Brouwers Dick H Plettenburg Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Mona Hichert David A Abbink Alistair N Vardy Corry K van der Sluis Wim G M Janssen Michael A H Brouwers Dick H Plettenburg |
author_sort |
Mona Hichert |
title |
Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses. |
title_short |
Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses. |
title_full |
Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses. |
title_fullStr |
Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses. |
title_sort |
perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Operating a body-powered prosthesis can be painful and tiring due to high cable operation forces, illustrating that low cable operation forces are a desirable design property for body-powered prostheses. However, lower operation forces might negatively affect controllability and force perception, which is plausible but not known. This study aims to quantify the accuracy of cable force perception and control for body-powered prostheses in a low cable operation force range by utilizing isometric and dynamic force reproduction experiments. Twenty-five subjects with trans-radial absence conducted two force reproduction tasks; first an isometric task of reproducing 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 or 40 N and second a force reproduction task of 10 and 20 N, for cable excursions of 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 mm. Task performance was quantified by the force reproduction error and the variability in the generated force. The results of the isometric experiment demonstrated that increasing force levels enlarge the force variability, but do not influence the force reproduction error for the tested force range. The second experiment showed that increased cable excursions resulted in a decreased force reproduction error, for both tested force levels, whereas the force variability remained unchanged. In conclusion, the design recommendations for voluntary closing body-powered prostheses suggested by this study are to minimize cable operation forces: this does not affect force reproduction error but does reduce force variability. Furthermore, increased cable excursions facilitate users with additional information to meet a target force more accurately. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225263 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT monahichert perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses AT davidaabbink perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses AT alistairnvardy perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses AT corrykvandersluis perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses AT wimgmjanssen perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses AT michaelahbrouwers perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses AT dickhplettenburg perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses |
_version_ |
1714817990404341760 |