Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.

Operating a body-powered prosthesis can be painful and tiring due to high cable operation forces, illustrating that low cable operation forces are a desirable design property for body-powered prostheses. However, lower operation forces might negatively affect controllability and force perception, wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mona Hichert, David A Abbink, Alistair N Vardy, Corry K van der Sluis, Wim G M Janssen, Michael A H Brouwers, Dick H Plettenburg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225263
id doaj-c919a04efe014c8d90b84fa7045f2522
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c919a04efe014c8d90b84fa7045f25222021-03-03T21:15:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011411e022526310.1371/journal.pone.0225263Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.Mona HichertDavid A AbbinkAlistair N VardyCorry K van der SluisWim G M JanssenMichael A H BrouwersDick H PlettenburgOperating a body-powered prosthesis can be painful and tiring due to high cable operation forces, illustrating that low cable operation forces are a desirable design property for body-powered prostheses. However, lower operation forces might negatively affect controllability and force perception, which is plausible but not known. This study aims to quantify the accuracy of cable force perception and control for body-powered prostheses in a low cable operation force range by utilizing isometric and dynamic force reproduction experiments. Twenty-five subjects with trans-radial absence conducted two force reproduction tasks; first an isometric task of reproducing 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 or 40 N and second a force reproduction task of 10 and 20 N, for cable excursions of 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 mm. Task performance was quantified by the force reproduction error and the variability in the generated force. The results of the isometric experiment demonstrated that increasing force levels enlarge the force variability, but do not influence the force reproduction error for the tested force range. The second experiment showed that increased cable excursions resulted in a decreased force reproduction error, for both tested force levels, whereas the force variability remained unchanged. In conclusion, the design recommendations for voluntary closing body-powered prostheses suggested by this study are to minimize cable operation forces: this does not affect force reproduction error but does reduce force variability. Furthermore, increased cable excursions facilitate users with additional information to meet a target force more accurately.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225263
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mona Hichert
David A Abbink
Alistair N Vardy
Corry K van der Sluis
Wim G M Janssen
Michael A H Brouwers
Dick H Plettenburg
spellingShingle Mona Hichert
David A Abbink
Alistair N Vardy
Corry K van der Sluis
Wim G M Janssen
Michael A H Brouwers
Dick H Plettenburg
Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mona Hichert
David A Abbink
Alistair N Vardy
Corry K van der Sluis
Wim G M Janssen
Michael A H Brouwers
Dick H Plettenburg
author_sort Mona Hichert
title Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.
title_short Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.
title_full Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.
title_fullStr Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.
title_full_unstemmed Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.
title_sort perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Operating a body-powered prosthesis can be painful and tiring due to high cable operation forces, illustrating that low cable operation forces are a desirable design property for body-powered prostheses. However, lower operation forces might negatively affect controllability and force perception, which is plausible but not known. This study aims to quantify the accuracy of cable force perception and control for body-powered prostheses in a low cable operation force range by utilizing isometric and dynamic force reproduction experiments. Twenty-five subjects with trans-radial absence conducted two force reproduction tasks; first an isometric task of reproducing 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 or 40 N and second a force reproduction task of 10 and 20 N, for cable excursions of 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 mm. Task performance was quantified by the force reproduction error and the variability in the generated force. The results of the isometric experiment demonstrated that increasing force levels enlarge the force variability, but do not influence the force reproduction error for the tested force range. The second experiment showed that increased cable excursions resulted in a decreased force reproduction error, for both tested force levels, whereas the force variability remained unchanged. In conclusion, the design recommendations for voluntary closing body-powered prostheses suggested by this study are to minimize cable operation forces: this does not affect force reproduction error but does reduce force variability. Furthermore, increased cable excursions facilitate users with additional information to meet a target force more accurately.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225263
work_keys_str_mv AT monahichert perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses
AT davidaabbink perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses
AT alistairnvardy perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses
AT corrykvandersluis perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses
AT wimgmjanssen perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses
AT michaelahbrouwers perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses
AT dickhplettenburg perceptionandcontroloflowcableoperationforcesinvoluntaryclosingbodypoweredupperlimbprostheses
_version_ 1714817990404341760