Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match study

Background: Three-port laparoscopic appendectomy is considered standard in many countries for the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis. Single-incision laparoscopic technique has been recently introduced and is supposed to minimize the aggression induced by surgery. Regarding appendectomy, compa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gaëtan-Romain Joliat, Emilie Uldry, Nicolas Demartines, Markus Schäfer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-03-01
Series:SAGE Open Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312114524195
id doaj-c90ceceb86174f4fbd51a2d19cc3a684
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c90ceceb86174f4fbd51a2d19cc3a6842020-11-25T02:48:07ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medicine2050-31212014-03-01210.1177/205031211452419510.1177_2050312114524195Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match studyGaëtan-Romain JoliatEmilie UldryNicolas DemartinesMarkus SchäferBackground: Three-port laparoscopic appendectomy is considered standard in many countries for the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis. Single-incision laparoscopic technique has been recently introduced and is supposed to minimize the aggression induced by surgery. Regarding appendectomy, comparison with standard laparoscopy, benefits and drawbacks of this novel technique remain to be evaluated. The goal of this study was to assess single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rate, and postoperative antibiotherapy rate. Methods: From February 2011 to December 2011, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy was proposed to patients admitted to the emergency room of the University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland), diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Preoperative patients’ information, technical difficulties during the operation, and postoperative follow-ups were recorded. Every patient who underwent single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 20) was matched 1:3 conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 60), controlling for age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and histopathological findings. Results: No statistically significant differences for median operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rate, and need for postoperative antibiotherapy were found. In 5 out of 20 single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy patients the Endoloop ® Ligature was judged difficult to put in place. Conclusion: This study suggests that single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a feasible and effective operative technique for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312114524195
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gaëtan-Romain Joliat
Emilie Uldry
Nicolas Demartines
Markus Schäfer
spellingShingle Gaëtan-Romain Joliat
Emilie Uldry
Nicolas Demartines
Markus Schäfer
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match study
SAGE Open Medicine
author_facet Gaëtan-Romain Joliat
Emilie Uldry
Nicolas Demartines
Markus Schäfer
author_sort Gaëtan-Romain Joliat
title Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match study
title_short Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match study
title_full Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match study
title_fullStr Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match study
title_full_unstemmed Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match study
title_sort single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a case-match study
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open Medicine
issn 2050-3121
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Background: Three-port laparoscopic appendectomy is considered standard in many countries for the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis. Single-incision laparoscopic technique has been recently introduced and is supposed to minimize the aggression induced by surgery. Regarding appendectomy, comparison with standard laparoscopy, benefits and drawbacks of this novel technique remain to be evaluated. The goal of this study was to assess single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rate, and postoperative antibiotherapy rate. Methods: From February 2011 to December 2011, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy was proposed to patients admitted to the emergency room of the University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland), diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Preoperative patients’ information, technical difficulties during the operation, and postoperative follow-ups were recorded. Every patient who underwent single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 20) was matched 1:3 conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 60), controlling for age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and histopathological findings. Results: No statistically significant differences for median operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rate, and need for postoperative antibiotherapy were found. In 5 out of 20 single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy patients the Endoloop ® Ligature was judged difficult to put in place. Conclusion: This study suggests that single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a feasible and effective operative technique for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312114524195
work_keys_str_mv AT gaetanromainjoliat singleincisionversusconventionallaparoscopicappendectomyacasematchstudy
AT emilieuldry singleincisionversusconventionallaparoscopicappendectomyacasematchstudy
AT nicolasdemartines singleincisionversusconventionallaparoscopicappendectomyacasematchstudy
AT markusschafer singleincisionversusconventionallaparoscopicappendectomyacasematchstudy
_version_ 1724749800375582720