A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community

Purpose - The aim of the study is to reveal the main characteristics of the domestic tourism-economics literature, as well as to compare the contributions made by the tourism, economics and administrative science (EAS) academia. The purpose is to identify the most distinctive aspects, more specifi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yakup Kemal ÖZEKİCİ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Isarder 2021-04-01
Series:İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.isarder.org/2021/vol.13_issue.1_article51.pdf
id doaj-c90396c94aad47218b8c66604ae2f931
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c90396c94aad47218b8c66604ae2f9312021-04-11T18:10:16ZengIsarderİşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi1309-07121309-07122021-04-0113179081210.20491/isarder.2021.1166A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic CommunityYakup Kemal ÖZEKİCİhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2482-7355Purpose - The aim of the study is to reveal the main characteristics of the domestic tourism-economics literature, as well as to compare the contributions made by the tourism, economics and administrative science (EAS) academia. The purpose is to identify the most distinctive aspects, more specifically, subjects (subdivision of economics, main topics, subtopics), methods (study design and sub design) and citations within the literature. Design/methodology/approach - To fulfil this aim, 291 articles in peer-reviewed journals published between 2000 and 2019 were compiled, encoded, categorized and analysed based on semi-systematic literature review principles. Findings - It is concluded that studies on the macroeconomic context are ahead of the microeconomic context, and that the role of tourism on economic growth is the mostly studied and cited subject. Furthermore, these studies are dominantly carried out by authors from the department of EAS. Similarly, quantitatively designed studies have three times more representation than qualitatively and conceptually designed studies. Within that, causality analysis, panel data and multiple approaches are generally adopted for quantitative studies, while tables are chosen as the leading method within qualitative ones. Discussion – All these findings imply that studies macroeconomics, conceptually designed and carried out by authors from EAS are more likely to be cited.https://www.isarder.org/2021/vol.13_issue.1_article51.pdfbibliometric analysisliterature reviewtourism economicstourism academic community
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yakup Kemal ÖZEKİCİ
spellingShingle Yakup Kemal ÖZEKİCİ
A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi
bibliometric analysis
literature review
tourism economics
tourism academic community
author_facet Yakup Kemal ÖZEKİCİ
author_sort Yakup Kemal ÖZEKİCİ
title A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
title_short A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
title_full A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
title_fullStr A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
title_full_unstemmed A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
title_sort bibliometric profile of the tourism-economics sub-field in turkish academic community
publisher Isarder
series İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi
issn 1309-0712
1309-0712
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Purpose - The aim of the study is to reveal the main characteristics of the domestic tourism-economics literature, as well as to compare the contributions made by the tourism, economics and administrative science (EAS) academia. The purpose is to identify the most distinctive aspects, more specifically, subjects (subdivision of economics, main topics, subtopics), methods (study design and sub design) and citations within the literature. Design/methodology/approach - To fulfil this aim, 291 articles in peer-reviewed journals published between 2000 and 2019 were compiled, encoded, categorized and analysed based on semi-systematic literature review principles. Findings - It is concluded that studies on the macroeconomic context are ahead of the microeconomic context, and that the role of tourism on economic growth is the mostly studied and cited subject. Furthermore, these studies are dominantly carried out by authors from the department of EAS. Similarly, quantitatively designed studies have three times more representation than qualitatively and conceptually designed studies. Within that, causality analysis, panel data and multiple approaches are generally adopted for quantitative studies, while tables are chosen as the leading method within qualitative ones. Discussion – All these findings imply that studies macroeconomics, conceptually designed and carried out by authors from EAS are more likely to be cited.
topic bibliometric analysis
literature review
tourism economics
tourism academic community
url https://www.isarder.org/2021/vol.13_issue.1_article51.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yakupkemalozekici abibliometricprofileofthetourismeconomicssubfieldinturkishacademiccommunity
AT yakupkemalozekici bibliometricprofileofthetourismeconomicssubfieldinturkishacademiccommunity
_version_ 1721530627039166464