Endometriosis does not confer improved prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective study at a single institute

Abstract Background Considered as the precursor lesion of a subset of ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), the prognostic role of endometriosis in OCCC patients remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of coexisting endometriosis in the survival of patients with OCC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ting Zhao, Yu Shao, Yan Liu, Xiao Wang, Luyao Guan, Yuan Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of Ovarian Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-018-0425-9
id doaj-c8eebf1a827943cca5f8b25ea7907c62
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8eebf1a827943cca5f8b25ea7907c622020-11-25T01:03:03ZengBMCJournal of Ovarian Research1757-22152018-06-0111111010.1186/s13048-018-0425-9Endometriosis does not confer improved prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective study at a single instituteTing Zhao0Yu Shao1Yan Liu2Xiao Wang3Luyao Guan4Yuan Lu5Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan UniversityDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan UniversityDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan UniversityDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan UniversityDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan UniversityDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan UniversityAbstract Background Considered as the precursor lesion of a subset of ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), the prognostic role of endometriosis in OCCC patients remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of coexisting endometriosis in the survival of patients with OCCC, and also sought to identify other prognostic factors. Results A total of 125 patients were diagnosed with OCCC during the study period. Of these, 55 (44.0%) patients had coexisting endometriosis. Patients with endometriosis were younger (p = 0.030), had smaller tumor diameter (p = 0.005) and lower preoperative CA125 levels (p = 0.005). More patients with endometriosis had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I disease (83.6% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.000) and exhibited sensitivity to platinum-based regimen (89.6% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.003). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that coexisting endometriosis was not a predictor of 5-year overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) of OCCC patients. For OS, chemosensitivity was the only useful prognostic factor (Hazards ratio (HR) 109.33, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 23.46–511.51; p = 0.000). For PFS, the useful prognostic factors were ascites (HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.21–6.47; p = 0.016), FIGO stage (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.04–2.49; p = 0.033), and chemosensitivity (HR 101.60, 95% CI 29.45–350.49; p = 0.000). Moreover, higher FIGO stage was the only risk factor for resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy (Exp (B) = 0.292, 95% CI 0.123–0.693; p = 0.005). Conclusions In this study, coexisting endometriosis was not a prognostic factor for the survival of OCCC patients. The most important predictor of both 5-year OS and PFS was chemosensitivity to platinum-based regimen, which decreased significantly with increase in FIGO stage.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-018-0425-9Clear cell carcinomaChemosensitivityEndometriosisOvarian cancerSurvival
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ting Zhao
Yu Shao
Yan Liu
Xiao Wang
Luyao Guan
Yuan Lu
spellingShingle Ting Zhao
Yu Shao
Yan Liu
Xiao Wang
Luyao Guan
Yuan Lu
Endometriosis does not confer improved prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective study at a single institute
Journal of Ovarian Research
Clear cell carcinoma
Chemosensitivity
Endometriosis
Ovarian cancer
Survival
author_facet Ting Zhao
Yu Shao
Yan Liu
Xiao Wang
Luyao Guan
Yuan Lu
author_sort Ting Zhao
title Endometriosis does not confer improved prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective study at a single institute
title_short Endometriosis does not confer improved prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective study at a single institute
title_full Endometriosis does not confer improved prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective study at a single institute
title_fullStr Endometriosis does not confer improved prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective study at a single institute
title_full_unstemmed Endometriosis does not confer improved prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective study at a single institute
title_sort endometriosis does not confer improved prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective study at a single institute
publisher BMC
series Journal of Ovarian Research
issn 1757-2215
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Abstract Background Considered as the precursor lesion of a subset of ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), the prognostic role of endometriosis in OCCC patients remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of coexisting endometriosis in the survival of patients with OCCC, and also sought to identify other prognostic factors. Results A total of 125 patients were diagnosed with OCCC during the study period. Of these, 55 (44.0%) patients had coexisting endometriosis. Patients with endometriosis were younger (p = 0.030), had smaller tumor diameter (p = 0.005) and lower preoperative CA125 levels (p = 0.005). More patients with endometriosis had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I disease (83.6% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.000) and exhibited sensitivity to platinum-based regimen (89.6% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.003). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that coexisting endometriosis was not a predictor of 5-year overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) of OCCC patients. For OS, chemosensitivity was the only useful prognostic factor (Hazards ratio (HR) 109.33, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 23.46–511.51; p = 0.000). For PFS, the useful prognostic factors were ascites (HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.21–6.47; p = 0.016), FIGO stage (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.04–2.49; p = 0.033), and chemosensitivity (HR 101.60, 95% CI 29.45–350.49; p = 0.000). Moreover, higher FIGO stage was the only risk factor for resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy (Exp (B) = 0.292, 95% CI 0.123–0.693; p = 0.005). Conclusions In this study, coexisting endometriosis was not a prognostic factor for the survival of OCCC patients. The most important predictor of both 5-year OS and PFS was chemosensitivity to platinum-based regimen, which decreased significantly with increase in FIGO stage.
topic Clear cell carcinoma
Chemosensitivity
Endometriosis
Ovarian cancer
Survival
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-018-0425-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tingzhao endometriosisdoesnotconferimprovedprognosisinovarianclearcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudyatasingleinstitute
AT yushao endometriosisdoesnotconferimprovedprognosisinovarianclearcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudyatasingleinstitute
AT yanliu endometriosisdoesnotconferimprovedprognosisinovarianclearcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudyatasingleinstitute
AT xiaowang endometriosisdoesnotconferimprovedprognosisinovarianclearcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudyatasingleinstitute
AT luyaoguan endometriosisdoesnotconferimprovedprognosisinovarianclearcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudyatasingleinstitute
AT yuanlu endometriosisdoesnotconferimprovedprognosisinovarianclearcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudyatasingleinstitute
_version_ 1725202594287058944