The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited
Abstract We revisit the semi-classical calculation of the size distribution of instantons at finite temperature in non-abelian gauge theories in four dimensions. The relevant functional determinants were first calculated in the seminal work of Gross, Pisarski and Yaffe and the results were used for...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of High Energy Physics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP03(2020)045 |
id |
doaj-c8ec4f6e46c34451942e97e36ad29bbd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c8ec4f6e46c34451942e97e36ad29bbd2020-11-25T01:48:40ZengSpringerOpenJournal of High Energy Physics1029-84792020-03-012020311610.1007/JHEP03(2020)045The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisitedAlexander Boccaletti0Daniel Nogradi1Department of Theoretical Physics, Eotvos UniversityDepartment of Theoretical Physics, Eotvos UniversityAbstract We revisit the semi-classical calculation of the size distribution of instantons at finite temperature in non-abelian gauge theories in four dimensions. The relevant functional determinants were first calculated in the seminal work of Gross, Pisarski and Yaffe and the results were used for a wide variety of applications including axions most recently. In this work we show that the uncertainty on the numerical evaluations and semi-analytical expressions are two orders of magnitude larger than claimed. As a result various quantities computed from the size distribution need to be reevaluated, for instance the resulting relative error on the topological susceptibility at arbitrarily high temperatures is about 5% for QCD and about 10% for SU(3) Yang-Mills theory. With higher rank gauge groups this discrepancy is even higher. We also provide a simple semi-analytical formula for the size distribution with absolute error 2 · 10 −4. In addition we also correct the over-all constant of the instanton size distribution in the MS ¯ $$ \overline{\mathrm{MS}} $$ scheme which was widely used incorrectly in the literature if non-trivial fermion content is present.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP03(2020)045Lattice Quantum Field TheoryNonperturbative EffectsSolitons Monopoles and Instantons |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alexander Boccaletti Daniel Nogradi |
spellingShingle |
Alexander Boccaletti Daniel Nogradi The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited Journal of High Energy Physics Lattice Quantum Field Theory Nonperturbative Effects Solitons Monopoles and Instantons |
author_facet |
Alexander Boccaletti Daniel Nogradi |
author_sort |
Alexander Boccaletti |
title |
The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited |
title_short |
The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited |
title_full |
The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited |
title_fullStr |
The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited |
title_full_unstemmed |
The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited |
title_sort |
semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Journal of High Energy Physics |
issn |
1029-8479 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Abstract We revisit the semi-classical calculation of the size distribution of instantons at finite temperature in non-abelian gauge theories in four dimensions. The relevant functional determinants were first calculated in the seminal work of Gross, Pisarski and Yaffe and the results were used for a wide variety of applications including axions most recently. In this work we show that the uncertainty on the numerical evaluations and semi-analytical expressions are two orders of magnitude larger than claimed. As a result various quantities computed from the size distribution need to be reevaluated, for instance the resulting relative error on the topological susceptibility at arbitrarily high temperatures is about 5% for QCD and about 10% for SU(3) Yang-Mills theory. With higher rank gauge groups this discrepancy is even higher. We also provide a simple semi-analytical formula for the size distribution with absolute error 2 · 10 −4. In addition we also correct the over-all constant of the instanton size distribution in the MS ¯ $$ \overline{\mathrm{MS}} $$ scheme which was widely used incorrectly in the literature if non-trivial fermion content is present. |
topic |
Lattice Quantum Field Theory Nonperturbative Effects Solitons Monopoles and Instantons |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP03(2020)045 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexanderboccaletti thesemiclassicalapproximationathightemperaturerevisited AT danielnogradi thesemiclassicalapproximationathightemperaturerevisited AT alexanderboccaletti semiclassicalapproximationathightemperaturerevisited AT danielnogradi semiclassicalapproximationathightemperaturerevisited |
_version_ |
1725010827734417408 |