The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited

Abstract We revisit the semi-classical calculation of the size distribution of instantons at finite temperature in non-abelian gauge theories in four dimensions. The relevant functional determinants were first calculated in the seminal work of Gross, Pisarski and Yaffe and the results were used for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Boccaletti, Daniel Nogradi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-03-01
Series:Journal of High Energy Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP03(2020)045
id doaj-c8ec4f6e46c34451942e97e36ad29bbd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8ec4f6e46c34451942e97e36ad29bbd2020-11-25T01:48:40ZengSpringerOpenJournal of High Energy Physics1029-84792020-03-012020311610.1007/JHEP03(2020)045The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisitedAlexander Boccaletti0Daniel Nogradi1Department of Theoretical Physics, Eotvos UniversityDepartment of Theoretical Physics, Eotvos UniversityAbstract We revisit the semi-classical calculation of the size distribution of instantons at finite temperature in non-abelian gauge theories in four dimensions. The relevant functional determinants were first calculated in the seminal work of Gross, Pisarski and Yaffe and the results were used for a wide variety of applications including axions most recently. In this work we show that the uncertainty on the numerical evaluations and semi-analytical expressions are two orders of magnitude larger than claimed. As a result various quantities computed from the size distribution need to be reevaluated, for instance the resulting relative error on the topological susceptibility at arbitrarily high temperatures is about 5% for QCD and about 10% for SU(3) Yang-Mills theory. With higher rank gauge groups this discrepancy is even higher. We also provide a simple semi-analytical formula for the size distribution with absolute error 2 · 10 −4. In addition we also correct the over-all constant of the instanton size distribution in the MS ¯ $$ \overline{\mathrm{MS}} $$ scheme which was widely used incorrectly in the literature if non-trivial fermion content is present.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP03(2020)045Lattice Quantum Field TheoryNonperturbative EffectsSolitons Monopoles and Instantons
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexander Boccaletti
Daniel Nogradi
spellingShingle Alexander Boccaletti
Daniel Nogradi
The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited
Journal of High Energy Physics
Lattice Quantum Field Theory
Nonperturbative Effects
Solitons Monopoles and Instantons
author_facet Alexander Boccaletti
Daniel Nogradi
author_sort Alexander Boccaletti
title The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited
title_short The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited
title_full The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited
title_fullStr The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited
title_full_unstemmed The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited
title_sort semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of High Energy Physics
issn 1029-8479
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Abstract We revisit the semi-classical calculation of the size distribution of instantons at finite temperature in non-abelian gauge theories in four dimensions. The relevant functional determinants were first calculated in the seminal work of Gross, Pisarski and Yaffe and the results were used for a wide variety of applications including axions most recently. In this work we show that the uncertainty on the numerical evaluations and semi-analytical expressions are two orders of magnitude larger than claimed. As a result various quantities computed from the size distribution need to be reevaluated, for instance the resulting relative error on the topological susceptibility at arbitrarily high temperatures is about 5% for QCD and about 10% for SU(3) Yang-Mills theory. With higher rank gauge groups this discrepancy is even higher. We also provide a simple semi-analytical formula for the size distribution with absolute error 2 · 10 −4. In addition we also correct the over-all constant of the instanton size distribution in the MS ¯ $$ \overline{\mathrm{MS}} $$ scheme which was widely used incorrectly in the literature if non-trivial fermion content is present.
topic Lattice Quantum Field Theory
Nonperturbative Effects
Solitons Monopoles and Instantons
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP03(2020)045
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderboccaletti thesemiclassicalapproximationathightemperaturerevisited
AT danielnogradi thesemiclassicalapproximationathightemperaturerevisited
AT alexanderboccaletti semiclassicalapproximationathightemperaturerevisited
AT danielnogradi semiclassicalapproximationathightemperaturerevisited
_version_ 1725010827734417408