The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery
BackgroundThe patient-controlled sedation (PCS) allows for rapid individualized titration of sedative drugs. Propofol has been the most widely used IV adjuvant, during the monitored anesthesia care (MAC). This study was designed to compare the sedation quality, side effect and recovery of the propof...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2012-11-01
|
Series: | Korean Journal of Anesthesiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-63-431.pdf |
id |
doaj-c8e4cf0f7a9c49d0a1ba6a46619c6a3b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c8e4cf0f7a9c49d0a1ba6a46619c6a3b2020-11-25T03:53:06ZengKorean Society of AnesthesiologistsKorean Journal of Anesthesiology2005-64192005-75632012-11-0163543143510.4097/kjae.2012.63.5.4317453The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgeryJin-Deok Joo0Jang Hyeok In1Dae-Woo Kim2Hong Soo Jung3Jae Hyeok Kang4Je Hwa Yeom5Jin Woo Choi6Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.BackgroundThe patient-controlled sedation (PCS) allows for rapid individualized titration of sedative drugs. Propofol has been the most widely used IV adjuvant, during the monitored anesthesia care (MAC). This study was designed to compare the sedation quality, side effect and recovery of the propofol alone, and propofol-remifentanil combination, using PCS for breast biopsy.MethodsSeventy five outpatients, undergoing breast biopsy procedures with local anesthesia, were randomly assigned to receive propofol alone (group P), propofol-25 ug/ml of remifentanil (group PR25), and propofol-50 ug/ml of remifentanil (group PR50), using PCS. Pain visual analogue scores (VAS) and digit symbol substitution test (DSST), Vital signs, bi-spectral index (BIS) and observer assessment of alertness and sedation (OAA/S) score were recorded.ResultsApply/Demand ratio in the group PR50 had a significant increase over the other groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of excessive sedation and dizziness were significantly more frequent in the group PR50 (P < 0.05). BIS and OAA/S score significantly decreased in the group PR25, PR50 at 15 min after the operation, the end of surgery (P < 0.05). At 5 min after the start of PCS, patients in the group PR25 and PR50 gave significantly less correct responses on the DSST than that of the group P (P < 0.05).ConclusionsCompared with the propofol alone, intermittent bolus injection of propofol-remifentanil mixture could be used, appropriately, for the sedation and analgesia during MAC. The group PR25 in a low dose of remifentanil has more advantages in terms of sedation and satisfaction because of the group PR50's side effects.http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-63-431.pdfmonitored anesthesia carepatient-controlled sedationpropofolremifentanil |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jin-Deok Joo Jang Hyeok In Dae-Woo Kim Hong Soo Jung Jae Hyeok Kang Je Hwa Yeom Jin Woo Choi |
spellingShingle |
Jin-Deok Joo Jang Hyeok In Dae-Woo Kim Hong Soo Jung Jae Hyeok Kang Je Hwa Yeom Jin Woo Choi The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery Korean Journal of Anesthesiology monitored anesthesia care patient-controlled sedation propofol remifentanil |
author_facet |
Jin-Deok Joo Jang Hyeok In Dae-Woo Kim Hong Soo Jung Jae Hyeok Kang Je Hwa Yeom Jin Woo Choi |
author_sort |
Jin-Deok Joo |
title |
The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery |
title_short |
The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery |
title_full |
The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery |
title_fullStr |
The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery |
title_full_unstemmed |
The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery |
title_sort |
comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery |
publisher |
Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
series |
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology |
issn |
2005-6419 2005-7563 |
publishDate |
2012-11-01 |
description |
BackgroundThe patient-controlled sedation (PCS) allows for rapid individualized titration of sedative drugs. Propofol has been the most widely used IV adjuvant, during the monitored anesthesia care (MAC). This study was designed to compare the sedation quality, side effect and recovery of the propofol alone, and propofol-remifentanil combination, using PCS for breast biopsy.MethodsSeventy five outpatients, undergoing breast biopsy procedures with local anesthesia, were randomly assigned to receive propofol alone (group P), propofol-25 ug/ml of remifentanil (group PR25), and propofol-50 ug/ml of remifentanil (group PR50), using PCS. Pain visual analogue scores (VAS) and digit symbol substitution test (DSST), Vital signs, bi-spectral index (BIS) and observer assessment of alertness and sedation (OAA/S) score were recorded.ResultsApply/Demand ratio in the group PR50 had a significant increase over the other groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of excessive sedation and dizziness were significantly more frequent in the group PR50 (P < 0.05). BIS and OAA/S score significantly decreased in the group PR25, PR50 at 15 min after the operation, the end of surgery (P < 0.05). At 5 min after the start of PCS, patients in the group PR25 and PR50 gave significantly less correct responses on the DSST than that of the group P (P < 0.05).ConclusionsCompared with the propofol alone, intermittent bolus injection of propofol-remifentanil mixture could be used, appropriately, for the sedation and analgesia during MAC. The group PR25 in a low dose of remifentanil has more advantages in terms of sedation and satisfaction because of the group PR50's side effects. |
topic |
monitored anesthesia care patient-controlled sedation propofol remifentanil |
url |
http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-63-431.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jindeokjoo thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT janghyeokin thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT daewookim thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT hongsoojung thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT jaehyeokkang thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT jehwayeom thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT jinwoochoi thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT jindeokjoo comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT janghyeokin comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT daewookim comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT hongsoojung comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT jaehyeokkang comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT jehwayeom comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery AT jinwoochoi comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery |
_version_ |
1724479878657474560 |