The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery

BackgroundThe patient-controlled sedation (PCS) allows for rapid individualized titration of sedative drugs. Propofol has been the most widely used IV adjuvant, during the monitored anesthesia care (MAC). This study was designed to compare the sedation quality, side effect and recovery of the propof...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jin-Deok Joo, Jang Hyeok In, Dae-Woo Kim, Hong Soo Jung, Jae Hyeok Kang, Je Hwa Yeom, Jin Woo Choi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2012-11-01
Series:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-63-431.pdf
id doaj-c8e4cf0f7a9c49d0a1ba6a46619c6a3b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8e4cf0f7a9c49d0a1ba6a46619c6a3b2020-11-25T03:53:06ZengKorean Society of AnesthesiologistsKorean Journal of Anesthesiology2005-64192005-75632012-11-0163543143510.4097/kjae.2012.63.5.4317453The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgeryJin-Deok Joo0Jang Hyeok In1Dae-Woo Kim2Hong Soo Jung3Jae Hyeok Kang4Je Hwa Yeom5Jin Woo Choi6Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.BackgroundThe patient-controlled sedation (PCS) allows for rapid individualized titration of sedative drugs. Propofol has been the most widely used IV adjuvant, during the monitored anesthesia care (MAC). This study was designed to compare the sedation quality, side effect and recovery of the propofol alone, and propofol-remifentanil combination, using PCS for breast biopsy.MethodsSeventy five outpatients, undergoing breast biopsy procedures with local anesthesia, were randomly assigned to receive propofol alone (group P), propofol-25 ug/ml of remifentanil (group PR25), and propofol-50 ug/ml of remifentanil (group PR50), using PCS. Pain visual analogue scores (VAS) and digit symbol substitution test (DSST), Vital signs, bi-spectral index (BIS) and observer assessment of alertness and sedation (OAA/S) score were recorded.ResultsApply/Demand ratio in the group PR50 had a significant increase over the other groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of excessive sedation and dizziness were significantly more frequent in the group PR50 (P < 0.05). BIS and OAA/S score significantly decreased in the group PR25, PR50 at 15 min after the operation, the end of surgery (P < 0.05). At 5 min after the start of PCS, patients in the group PR25 and PR50 gave significantly less correct responses on the DSST than that of the group P (P < 0.05).ConclusionsCompared with the propofol alone, intermittent bolus injection of propofol-remifentanil mixture could be used, appropriately, for the sedation and analgesia during MAC. The group PR25 in a low dose of remifentanil has more advantages in terms of sedation and satisfaction because of the group PR50's side effects.http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-63-431.pdfmonitored anesthesia carepatient-controlled sedationpropofolremifentanil
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jin-Deok Joo
Jang Hyeok In
Dae-Woo Kim
Hong Soo Jung
Jae Hyeok Kang
Je Hwa Yeom
Jin Woo Choi
spellingShingle Jin-Deok Joo
Jang Hyeok In
Dae-Woo Kim
Hong Soo Jung
Jae Hyeok Kang
Je Hwa Yeom
Jin Woo Choi
The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
monitored anesthesia care
patient-controlled sedation
propofol
remifentanil
author_facet Jin-Deok Joo
Jang Hyeok In
Dae-Woo Kim
Hong Soo Jung
Jae Hyeok Kang
Je Hwa Yeom
Jin Woo Choi
author_sort Jin-Deok Joo
title The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery
title_short The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery
title_full The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery
title_fullStr The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery
title_sort comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery
publisher Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
series Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
issn 2005-6419
2005-7563
publishDate 2012-11-01
description BackgroundThe patient-controlled sedation (PCS) allows for rapid individualized titration of sedative drugs. Propofol has been the most widely used IV adjuvant, during the monitored anesthesia care (MAC). This study was designed to compare the sedation quality, side effect and recovery of the propofol alone, and propofol-remifentanil combination, using PCS for breast biopsy.MethodsSeventy five outpatients, undergoing breast biopsy procedures with local anesthesia, were randomly assigned to receive propofol alone (group P), propofol-25 ug/ml of remifentanil (group PR25), and propofol-50 ug/ml of remifentanil (group PR50), using PCS. Pain visual analogue scores (VAS) and digit symbol substitution test (DSST), Vital signs, bi-spectral index (BIS) and observer assessment of alertness and sedation (OAA/S) score were recorded.ResultsApply/Demand ratio in the group PR50 had a significant increase over the other groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of excessive sedation and dizziness were significantly more frequent in the group PR50 (P < 0.05). BIS and OAA/S score significantly decreased in the group PR25, PR50 at 15 min after the operation, the end of surgery (P < 0.05). At 5 min after the start of PCS, patients in the group PR25 and PR50 gave significantly less correct responses on the DSST than that of the group P (P < 0.05).ConclusionsCompared with the propofol alone, intermittent bolus injection of propofol-remifentanil mixture could be used, appropriately, for the sedation and analgesia during MAC. The group PR25 in a low dose of remifentanil has more advantages in terms of sedation and satisfaction because of the group PR50's side effects.
topic monitored anesthesia care
patient-controlled sedation
propofol
remifentanil
url http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-63-431.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jindeokjoo thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT janghyeokin thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT daewookim thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT hongsoojung thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT jaehyeokkang thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT jehwayeom thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT jinwoochoi thecomparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT jindeokjoo comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT janghyeokin comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT daewookim comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT hongsoojung comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT jaehyeokkang comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT jehwayeom comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
AT jinwoochoi comparisonofsedationqualitysideeffectandrecoveryprofilesondifferentdosageofremifentanilpatientcontrolledsedationduringbreastbiopsysurgery
_version_ 1724479878657474560