Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups

Abstract Research groups are the cornerstone of scientific research, yet little is known about how these groups are formed and how their organization is influenced by the gender of the research group leader. This represents an important gap in our understanding of the processes shaping gender struct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denon Start, Shannon McCauley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-05-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6188
id doaj-c8dcfec84d364e9fb8b4418ac8f85fe2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8dcfec84d364e9fb8b4418ac8f85fe22021-04-02T12:56:14ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582020-05-011093834384310.1002/ece3.6188Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groupsDenon Start0Shannon McCauley1Center for Population Biology UC Davis Davis CA USADepartment of Biology University of Toronto Mississauga Mississauga ON CanadaAbstract Research groups are the cornerstone of scientific research, yet little is known about how these groups are formed and how their organization is influenced by the gender of the research group leader. This represents an important gap in our understanding of the processes shaping gender structure within universities and the academic fields they represent. Here, we report the results of an email survey sent to department chairs and discipline‐specific listservs. We received responses from 275 female and 175 male research group leaders. Most respondents were biologists (n = 328) but psychology (n = 27), chemistry (n = 16), physics (n = 32), and mathematics (n = 30) were also relatively well represented. We found that men were self‐reported as overrepresented in research groups in the physical sciences, particularly at later career stages. Within biology, male and female group leaders reported supervising a disproportionate number of same‐gender trainees (students and postdoctoral fellows), particularly early in their careers. These self‐reported patterns were driven primarily by gender‐based differences in the pool of students applying to their research groups, while gender differences in acceptance rates played a seemingly smaller role. We discuss the implications of our results for women continuing into the professoriate and for the recruitment of young scientists into research groups.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6188academiadiversityscience workforceSTEM
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Denon Start
Shannon McCauley
spellingShingle Denon Start
Shannon McCauley
Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups
Ecology and Evolution
academia
diversity
science workforce
STEM
author_facet Denon Start
Shannon McCauley
author_sort Denon Start
title Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups
title_short Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups
title_full Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups
title_fullStr Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups
title_full_unstemmed Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups
title_sort gender underlies the formation of stem research groups
publisher Wiley
series Ecology and Evolution
issn 2045-7758
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Research groups are the cornerstone of scientific research, yet little is known about how these groups are formed and how their organization is influenced by the gender of the research group leader. This represents an important gap in our understanding of the processes shaping gender structure within universities and the academic fields they represent. Here, we report the results of an email survey sent to department chairs and discipline‐specific listservs. We received responses from 275 female and 175 male research group leaders. Most respondents were biologists (n = 328) but psychology (n = 27), chemistry (n = 16), physics (n = 32), and mathematics (n = 30) were also relatively well represented. We found that men were self‐reported as overrepresented in research groups in the physical sciences, particularly at later career stages. Within biology, male and female group leaders reported supervising a disproportionate number of same‐gender trainees (students and postdoctoral fellows), particularly early in their careers. These self‐reported patterns were driven primarily by gender‐based differences in the pool of students applying to their research groups, while gender differences in acceptance rates played a seemingly smaller role. We discuss the implications of our results for women continuing into the professoriate and for the recruitment of young scientists into research groups.
topic academia
diversity
science workforce
STEM
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6188
work_keys_str_mv AT denonstart genderunderliestheformationofstemresearchgroups
AT shannonmccauley genderunderliestheformationofstemresearchgroups
_version_ 1721567118243135488