Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups
Abstract Research groups are the cornerstone of scientific research, yet little is known about how these groups are formed and how their organization is influenced by the gender of the research group leader. This represents an important gap in our understanding of the processes shaping gender struct...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6188 |
id |
doaj-c8dcfec84d364e9fb8b4418ac8f85fe2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c8dcfec84d364e9fb8b4418ac8f85fe22021-04-02T12:56:14ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582020-05-011093834384310.1002/ece3.6188Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groupsDenon Start0Shannon McCauley1Center for Population Biology UC Davis Davis CA USADepartment of Biology University of Toronto Mississauga Mississauga ON CanadaAbstract Research groups are the cornerstone of scientific research, yet little is known about how these groups are formed and how their organization is influenced by the gender of the research group leader. This represents an important gap in our understanding of the processes shaping gender structure within universities and the academic fields they represent. Here, we report the results of an email survey sent to department chairs and discipline‐specific listservs. We received responses from 275 female and 175 male research group leaders. Most respondents were biologists (n = 328) but psychology (n = 27), chemistry (n = 16), physics (n = 32), and mathematics (n = 30) were also relatively well represented. We found that men were self‐reported as overrepresented in research groups in the physical sciences, particularly at later career stages. Within biology, male and female group leaders reported supervising a disproportionate number of same‐gender trainees (students and postdoctoral fellows), particularly early in their careers. These self‐reported patterns were driven primarily by gender‐based differences in the pool of students applying to their research groups, while gender differences in acceptance rates played a seemingly smaller role. We discuss the implications of our results for women continuing into the professoriate and for the recruitment of young scientists into research groups.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6188academiadiversityscience workforceSTEM |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Denon Start Shannon McCauley |
spellingShingle |
Denon Start Shannon McCauley Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups Ecology and Evolution academia diversity science workforce STEM |
author_facet |
Denon Start Shannon McCauley |
author_sort |
Denon Start |
title |
Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups |
title_short |
Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups |
title_full |
Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups |
title_fullStr |
Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups |
title_sort |
gender underlies the formation of stem research groups |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Ecology and Evolution |
issn |
2045-7758 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Research groups are the cornerstone of scientific research, yet little is known about how these groups are formed and how their organization is influenced by the gender of the research group leader. This represents an important gap in our understanding of the processes shaping gender structure within universities and the academic fields they represent. Here, we report the results of an email survey sent to department chairs and discipline‐specific listservs. We received responses from 275 female and 175 male research group leaders. Most respondents were biologists (n = 328) but psychology (n = 27), chemistry (n = 16), physics (n = 32), and mathematics (n = 30) were also relatively well represented. We found that men were self‐reported as overrepresented in research groups in the physical sciences, particularly at later career stages. Within biology, male and female group leaders reported supervising a disproportionate number of same‐gender trainees (students and postdoctoral fellows), particularly early in their careers. These self‐reported patterns were driven primarily by gender‐based differences in the pool of students applying to their research groups, while gender differences in acceptance rates played a seemingly smaller role. We discuss the implications of our results for women continuing into the professoriate and for the recruitment of young scientists into research groups. |
topic |
academia diversity science workforce STEM |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6188 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT denonstart genderunderliestheformationofstemresearchgroups AT shannonmccauley genderunderliestheformationofstemresearchgroups |
_version_ |
1721567118243135488 |