Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Photodecarbonylation Study of a Dicarbonyl Ruthenium(II)‐Bisquinoline Complex

Abstract A photoactivatable ruthenium(II) carbonyl complex mer,cis‐[Ru(II)Cl(BisQ)(CO)2]PF6 2 was prepared using a tridentate bisquinoline ligand (BisQ=(2,6‐diquinolin‐2‐yl)pyridin). Compound 2 was thoroughly characterized by standard analytical methods and single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The crys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dr. Manja Kubeil, Dr. Tanmaya Joshi, Prof. Bayden R. Wood, Dr. Holger Stephan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley-VCH 2019-05-01
Series:ChemistryOpen
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/open.201900111
Description
Summary:Abstract A photoactivatable ruthenium(II) carbonyl complex mer,cis‐[Ru(II)Cl(BisQ)(CO)2]PF6 2 was prepared using a tridentate bisquinoline ligand (BisQ=(2,6‐diquinolin‐2‐yl)pyridin). Compound 2 was thoroughly characterized by standard analytical methods and single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The crystal structure of the complex cation reveals a distorted octahedral geometry. The decarbonylation upon exposure to 350 and 420 nm light was monitored by UV/VIS absorbance and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopies in acetonitrile and 1 % (v/v) DMSO in water, respectively. The kinetic of the photodecarbonylation has been elucidated by multivariate curve resolution alternating least‐squares analysis. The stepwise decarbonylation follows a serial mechanism. The first decarbonylation occurs very quickly whereas the second decarbonylation step proceeds more slowly. Moreover, the second rate constant is lower in 1 % (v/v) DMSO in water than in acetonitrile. In comparison to 350 nm irradiation, exposure to 420 nm light in acetonitrile results in a lower second rate constant.
ISSN:2191-1363