Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation.

As cooperation incurs a cost to the cooperator for others to benefit, its evolution seems to contradict natural selection. How evolution has resolved this obstacle has been among the most intensely studied questions in evolutionary theory in recent decades. Here, we show that having a choice between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammad Salahshour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-02-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008703
id doaj-c8d77c99d4df4f098a89ba9965197f9f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8d77c99d4df4f098a89ba9965197f9f2021-07-09T04:32:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582021-02-01172e100870310.1371/journal.pcbi.1008703Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation.Mohammad SalahshourAs cooperation incurs a cost to the cooperator for others to benefit, its evolution seems to contradict natural selection. How evolution has resolved this obstacle has been among the most intensely studied questions in evolutionary theory in recent decades. Here, we show that having a choice between different public resources provides a simple mechanism for cooperation to flourish. Such a mechanism can be at work in many biological or social contexts where individuals can form different groups or join different institutions to perform a collective action task, or when they can choose between collective actions with different profitability. As a simple evolutionary model suggests, defectors tend to join the highest quality resource in such a context. This allows cooperators to survive and out-compete defectors by sheltering in a lower quality resource. Cooperation is maximized, however, when the qualities of the two highest quality resources are similar, and thus, they are almost interchangeable.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008703
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Salahshour
spellingShingle Mohammad Salahshour
Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Mohammad Salahshour
author_sort Mohammad Salahshour
title Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation.
title_short Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation.
title_full Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation.
title_fullStr Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation.
title_full_unstemmed Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation.
title_sort freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2021-02-01
description As cooperation incurs a cost to the cooperator for others to benefit, its evolution seems to contradict natural selection. How evolution has resolved this obstacle has been among the most intensely studied questions in evolutionary theory in recent decades. Here, we show that having a choice between different public resources provides a simple mechanism for cooperation to flourish. Such a mechanism can be at work in many biological or social contexts where individuals can form different groups or join different institutions to perform a collective action task, or when they can choose between collective actions with different profitability. As a simple evolutionary model suggests, defectors tend to join the highest quality resource in such a context. This allows cooperators to survive and out-compete defectors by sheltering in a lower quality resource. Cooperation is maximized, however, when the qualities of the two highest quality resources are similar, and thus, they are almost interchangeable.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008703
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadsalahshour freedomtochoosebetweenpublicresourcespromotescooperation
_version_ 1714453765521670144