An engineering approach to quantify geomechanical safety factors in UGS programs

<p>Underground Gas Storage (UGS) has become one of the most widely used practices to cope with seasonal peaks in energy consumption. The planning of any new UGS facility, or its upgrading to increase the working gas volume and reservoir performance, must be supported by an evaluation of possib...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Isotton, P. Teatini, R. Stefanelli, M. Ferronato, C. Janna, M. Cerri, T. Gukov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-04-01
Series:Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences
Online Access:https://www.proc-iahs.net/382/475/2020/piahs-382-475-2020.pdf
id doaj-c8c8ff47b83a440dad70900a5834e849
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8c8ff47b83a440dad70900a5834e8492020-11-25T02:37:48ZengCopernicus PublicationsProceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences2199-89812199-899X2020-04-0138247548010.5194/piahs-382-475-2020An engineering approach to quantify geomechanical safety factors in UGS programsG. Isotton0P. Teatini1P. Teatini2R. Stefanelli3M. Ferronato4M. Ferronato5C. Janna6C. Janna7M. Cerri8T. Gukov9M3E Srl, Padova, ItalyM3E Srl, Padova, ItalyDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, ItalyEdison Stoccaggio SpA, Milano, ItalyM3E Srl, Padova, ItalyDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, ItalyM3E Srl, Padova, ItalyDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, ItalyEdison Stoccaggio SpA, Milano, ItalyEdison Stoccaggio SpA, Milano, Italy<p>Underground Gas Storage (UGS) has become one of the most widely used practices to cope with seasonal peaks in energy consumption. The planning of any new UGS facility, or its upgrading to increase the working gas volume and reservoir performance, must be supported by an evaluation of possible induced effects on the environment. From a geomechanical point of view, storage activity results in a cyclic change in stress and deformation in the reservoir rock and the surrounding formations. The main environmental issues to be accounted for when natural fluid pore pressure is planned to be exceeded are the following: (a) the differential displacements at the land surface possibly mining the integrity of ground structure; (b) the integrity of the reservoir and caprock; (c) the possible reactivation of faults, if the target reservoir is located in a faulted basin; and (d) the vertical upheaval and land subsidence that can impact on the surface drainage network in low lying coastal areas. We present an original methodology for evaluating the geomechanical safety of UGS activities using an approach derived from what is traditionally applied in the structural design of buildings. A safety factor, a margin of security against risks, is defined for each of the geomechanical issues listed above. First, a 3D FE-IE numerical model is developed to reproduce the stress and displacement due to the UGS program under evaluation. Then the reservoir pressure is increased until the “failure” condition is reached allowing to evaluate how far the project designed condition is from the above limit. The proposed approach is applied to Romagna, a depleted gas reservoir in Northern Italy converted to UGS, with the aim of investigating the safety of the project to increase the reservoir pressure up to 120&thinsp;%&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><sub>i</sub></span>, where <span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><sub>i</sub></span> is the original reservoir pressure before the start of primary production. The 3D geomechanical model has been developed using recent 3D seismic data, land displacements by InSAR, lab tests on reservoir and caprock samples, in-situ Modular Formation Dynamic Tester (MDT) stress tests, and large background information acquired from other UGS reservoirs located in the same sedimentary basin. The analysis outcome has revealed that the investigated scenario is safe, with safety factor larger than 1, in the range from 1.2 to 4. The most critical condition (the smallest safety factor) has been obtained in relation to the mechanical integrity of the reservoir formation, under very conservative conditions (cohesion&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">=</span>&thinsp;0, friction angle&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">=</span>&thinsp;30<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>).</p>https://www.proc-iahs.net/382/475/2020/piahs-382-475-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. Isotton
P. Teatini
P. Teatini
R. Stefanelli
M. Ferronato
M. Ferronato
C. Janna
C. Janna
M. Cerri
T. Gukov
spellingShingle G. Isotton
P. Teatini
P. Teatini
R. Stefanelli
M. Ferronato
M. Ferronato
C. Janna
C. Janna
M. Cerri
T. Gukov
An engineering approach to quantify geomechanical safety factors in UGS programs
Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences
author_facet G. Isotton
P. Teatini
P. Teatini
R. Stefanelli
M. Ferronato
M. Ferronato
C. Janna
C. Janna
M. Cerri
T. Gukov
author_sort G. Isotton
title An engineering approach to quantify geomechanical safety factors in UGS programs
title_short An engineering approach to quantify geomechanical safety factors in UGS programs
title_full An engineering approach to quantify geomechanical safety factors in UGS programs
title_fullStr An engineering approach to quantify geomechanical safety factors in UGS programs
title_full_unstemmed An engineering approach to quantify geomechanical safety factors in UGS programs
title_sort engineering approach to quantify geomechanical safety factors in ugs programs
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences
issn 2199-8981
2199-899X
publishDate 2020-04-01
description <p>Underground Gas Storage (UGS) has become one of the most widely used practices to cope with seasonal peaks in energy consumption. The planning of any new UGS facility, or its upgrading to increase the working gas volume and reservoir performance, must be supported by an evaluation of possible induced effects on the environment. From a geomechanical point of view, storage activity results in a cyclic change in stress and deformation in the reservoir rock and the surrounding formations. The main environmental issues to be accounted for when natural fluid pore pressure is planned to be exceeded are the following: (a) the differential displacements at the land surface possibly mining the integrity of ground structure; (b) the integrity of the reservoir and caprock; (c) the possible reactivation of faults, if the target reservoir is located in a faulted basin; and (d) the vertical upheaval and land subsidence that can impact on the surface drainage network in low lying coastal areas. We present an original methodology for evaluating the geomechanical safety of UGS activities using an approach derived from what is traditionally applied in the structural design of buildings. A safety factor, a margin of security against risks, is defined for each of the geomechanical issues listed above. First, a 3D FE-IE numerical model is developed to reproduce the stress and displacement due to the UGS program under evaluation. Then the reservoir pressure is increased until the “failure” condition is reached allowing to evaluate how far the project designed condition is from the above limit. The proposed approach is applied to Romagna, a depleted gas reservoir in Northern Italy converted to UGS, with the aim of investigating the safety of the project to increase the reservoir pressure up to 120&thinsp;%&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><sub>i</sub></span>, where <span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><sub>i</sub></span> is the original reservoir pressure before the start of primary production. The 3D geomechanical model has been developed using recent 3D seismic data, land displacements by InSAR, lab tests on reservoir and caprock samples, in-situ Modular Formation Dynamic Tester (MDT) stress tests, and large background information acquired from other UGS reservoirs located in the same sedimentary basin. The analysis outcome has revealed that the investigated scenario is safe, with safety factor larger than 1, in the range from 1.2 to 4. The most critical condition (the smallest safety factor) has been obtained in relation to the mechanical integrity of the reservoir formation, under very conservative conditions (cohesion&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">=</span>&thinsp;0, friction angle&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">=</span>&thinsp;30<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>).</p>
url https://www.proc-iahs.net/382/475/2020/piahs-382-475-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gisotton anengineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT pteatini anengineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT pteatini anengineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT rstefanelli anengineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT mferronato anengineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT mferronato anengineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT cjanna anengineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT cjanna anengineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT mcerri anengineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT tgukov anengineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT gisotton engineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT pteatini engineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT pteatini engineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT rstefanelli engineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT mferronato engineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT mferronato engineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT cjanna engineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT cjanna engineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT mcerri engineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
AT tgukov engineeringapproachtoquantifygeomechanicalsafetyfactorsinugsprograms
_version_ 1724793297393680384