Trends in Pathology Graduate Medical Education Programs and Positions, 2001 to 2017

The US medical workforce is facing an impending physician shortage. This shortage holds special concern for pathologists, as many senior practitioners are set to retire in the coming years. Indeed, studies indicate a “pathologist gap” may grow through 2030. As such, it is important to understand cur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aldis H. Petriceks BA, Darren Salmi MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-03-01
Series:Academic Pathology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289518765457
id doaj-c8be127d977341e9ba0f4ec1935b5631
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8be127d977341e9ba0f4ec1935b56312020-11-25T02:55:16ZengSAGE PublishingAcademic Pathology2374-28952018-03-01510.1177/2374289518765457Trends in Pathology Graduate Medical Education Programs and Positions, 2001 to 2017Aldis H. Petriceks BA0Darren Salmi MD1 Division of Clinical Anatomy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USAThe US medical workforce is facing an impending physician shortage. This shortage holds special concern for pathologists, as many senior practitioners are set to retire in the coming years. Indeed, studies indicate a “pathologist gap” may grow through 2030. As such, it is important to understand current and future trends in US pathology. One key factor is graduate medical education. In this study, we analyzed data from the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education, to determine the change in pathology graduate medical education programs and positions, from 2001 to 2017. We found that pathology programs and positions have increased since the 2001 to 2002 academic year, even after adjusting for population growth. However, this increase is much lower than that of total graduate medical education. Furthermore, many pathology subspecialties have declined in population-adjusted levels. Other subspecialties, such as selective pathology, have grown disproportionately. Our findings may be valuable for understanding the state of US pathology, now and in the future. They imply that more resources—or technological innovations—may be needed for specific pathology programs, in hopes of closing the pathologist gap for both this specialty and its subspecialties.https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289518765457
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aldis H. Petriceks BA
Darren Salmi MD
spellingShingle Aldis H. Petriceks BA
Darren Salmi MD
Trends in Pathology Graduate Medical Education Programs and Positions, 2001 to 2017
Academic Pathology
author_facet Aldis H. Petriceks BA
Darren Salmi MD
author_sort Aldis H. Petriceks BA
title Trends in Pathology Graduate Medical Education Programs and Positions, 2001 to 2017
title_short Trends in Pathology Graduate Medical Education Programs and Positions, 2001 to 2017
title_full Trends in Pathology Graduate Medical Education Programs and Positions, 2001 to 2017
title_fullStr Trends in Pathology Graduate Medical Education Programs and Positions, 2001 to 2017
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Pathology Graduate Medical Education Programs and Positions, 2001 to 2017
title_sort trends in pathology graduate medical education programs and positions, 2001 to 2017
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Academic Pathology
issn 2374-2895
publishDate 2018-03-01
description The US medical workforce is facing an impending physician shortage. This shortage holds special concern for pathologists, as many senior practitioners are set to retire in the coming years. Indeed, studies indicate a “pathologist gap” may grow through 2030. As such, it is important to understand current and future trends in US pathology. One key factor is graduate medical education. In this study, we analyzed data from the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education, to determine the change in pathology graduate medical education programs and positions, from 2001 to 2017. We found that pathology programs and positions have increased since the 2001 to 2002 academic year, even after adjusting for population growth. However, this increase is much lower than that of total graduate medical education. Furthermore, many pathology subspecialties have declined in population-adjusted levels. Other subspecialties, such as selective pathology, have grown disproportionately. Our findings may be valuable for understanding the state of US pathology, now and in the future. They imply that more resources—or technological innovations—may be needed for specific pathology programs, in hopes of closing the pathologist gap for both this specialty and its subspecialties.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289518765457
work_keys_str_mv AT aldishpetriceksba trendsinpathologygraduatemedicaleducationprogramsandpositions2001to2017
AT darrensalmimd trendsinpathologygraduatemedicaleducationprogramsandpositions2001to2017
_version_ 1724717088479641600