Learning From Love Island? Diversification of the Hegemonic Man

It is undeniable that Love Island promotes specific ideas of masculinity and masculine behaviors. There is an “expected” masculinity performed in the villa, exemplified in cases, such as “The Do Bits Society” which advocates heteronormative forms of masculinity and gender relations (Whitehead and Ba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kitty Nichols
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00072/full
id doaj-c8a5c1c091564edbaacb8f4dd39766c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8a5c1c091564edbaacb8f4dd39766c12020-11-25T01:41:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sociology2297-77752019-11-01410.3389/fsoc.2019.00072469592Learning From Love Island? Diversification of the Hegemonic ManKitty NicholsIt is undeniable that Love Island promotes specific ideas of masculinity and masculine behaviors. There is an “expected” masculinity performed in the villa, exemplified in cases, such as “The Do Bits Society” which advocates heteronormative forms of masculinity and gender relations (Whitehead and Barrett, 2008). Within such examples men had to successfully perform what Schrock and Schwalbe (2009) refer to as “manhood acts” in order to prove their masculine identity. This form of masculinity, which dominated the space, can be explained sociologically via intersecting hegemonic and performance theorizing (Goffman, 1974; Connell, 2005; Butler, 2008; Wellard, 2009). However, utilizing new combinations of theoretical approaches, this paper will explore more diverse performances of masculinity present in the villa. This includes the ways that men were making choices in the construction of their masculine identities beyond the “expected” masculinity which dominated, as well as how women also performed this form of masculinity. Through analysis of two seasons of Love Island (2018 and 2017), this paper will highlight how lines between different ways of living and experiencing masculinity can be blurred and fluid. In doing so, the paper encourages a critique of how we theorize masculinity and gender more widely, allowing for emergent theorizing which blends existing theories in new ways.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00072/fullLove Islandmasculinityemotioncaregender performancereality TV
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kitty Nichols
spellingShingle Kitty Nichols
Learning From Love Island? Diversification of the Hegemonic Man
Frontiers in Sociology
Love Island
masculinity
emotion
care
gender performance
reality TV
author_facet Kitty Nichols
author_sort Kitty Nichols
title Learning From Love Island? Diversification of the Hegemonic Man
title_short Learning From Love Island? Diversification of the Hegemonic Man
title_full Learning From Love Island? Diversification of the Hegemonic Man
title_fullStr Learning From Love Island? Diversification of the Hegemonic Man
title_full_unstemmed Learning From Love Island? Diversification of the Hegemonic Man
title_sort learning from love island? diversification of the hegemonic man
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Sociology
issn 2297-7775
publishDate 2019-11-01
description It is undeniable that Love Island promotes specific ideas of masculinity and masculine behaviors. There is an “expected” masculinity performed in the villa, exemplified in cases, such as “The Do Bits Society” which advocates heteronormative forms of masculinity and gender relations (Whitehead and Barrett, 2008). Within such examples men had to successfully perform what Schrock and Schwalbe (2009) refer to as “manhood acts” in order to prove their masculine identity. This form of masculinity, which dominated the space, can be explained sociologically via intersecting hegemonic and performance theorizing (Goffman, 1974; Connell, 2005; Butler, 2008; Wellard, 2009). However, utilizing new combinations of theoretical approaches, this paper will explore more diverse performances of masculinity present in the villa. This includes the ways that men were making choices in the construction of their masculine identities beyond the “expected” masculinity which dominated, as well as how women also performed this form of masculinity. Through analysis of two seasons of Love Island (2018 and 2017), this paper will highlight how lines between different ways of living and experiencing masculinity can be blurred and fluid. In doing so, the paper encourages a critique of how we theorize masculinity and gender more widely, allowing for emergent theorizing which blends existing theories in new ways.
topic Love Island
masculinity
emotion
care
gender performance
reality TV
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00072/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kittynichols learningfromloveislanddiversificationofthehegemonicman
_version_ 1725039903784304640