Is countershading camouflage robust to lighting change due to weather?

Countershading is a pattern of coloration thought to have evolved in order to implement camouflage. By adopting a pattern of coloration that makes the surface facing towards the sun darker and the surface facing away from the sun lighter, the overall amount of light reflected off an animal can be ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivier Penacchio, P. George Lovell, Julie M. Harris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2018-01-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.170801
id doaj-c89110e3805e4ef5bc0bf37e1e94e601
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c89110e3805e4ef5bc0bf37e1e94e6012020-11-25T03:44:04ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032018-01-015210.1098/rsos.170801170801Is countershading camouflage robust to lighting change due to weather?Olivier PenacchioP. George LovellJulie M. HarrisCountershading is a pattern of coloration thought to have evolved in order to implement camouflage. By adopting a pattern of coloration that makes the surface facing towards the sun darker and the surface facing away from the sun lighter, the overall amount of light reflected off an animal can be made more uniformly bright. Countershading could hence contribute to visual camouflage by increasing background matching or reducing cues to shape. However, the usefulness of countershading is constrained by a particular pattern delivering ‘optimal’ camouflage only for very specific lighting conditions. In this study, we test the robustness of countershading camouflage to lighting change due to weather, using human participants as a ‘generic’ predator. In a simulated three-dimensional environment, we constructed an array of simple leaf-shaped items and a single ellipsoidal target ‘prey’. We set these items in two light environments: strongly directional ‘sunny’ and more diffuse ‘cloudy’. The target object was given the optimal pattern of countershading for one of these two environment types or displayed a uniform pattern. By measuring detection time and accuracy, we explored whether and how target detection depended on the match between the pattern of coloration on the target object and scene lighting. Detection times were longest when the countershading was appropriate to the illumination; incorrectly camouflaged targets were detected with a similar pattern of speed and accuracy to uniformly coloured targets. We conclude that structural changes in light environment, such as caused by differences in weather, do change the effectiveness of countershading camouflage.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.170801visual searchsearch efficiencyshape-from-shadingvisual camouflagecountershadingforaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olivier Penacchio
P. George Lovell
Julie M. Harris
spellingShingle Olivier Penacchio
P. George Lovell
Julie M. Harris
Is countershading camouflage robust to lighting change due to weather?
Royal Society Open Science
visual search
search efficiency
shape-from-shading
visual camouflage
countershading
foraging
author_facet Olivier Penacchio
P. George Lovell
Julie M. Harris
author_sort Olivier Penacchio
title Is countershading camouflage robust to lighting change due to weather?
title_short Is countershading camouflage robust to lighting change due to weather?
title_full Is countershading camouflage robust to lighting change due to weather?
title_fullStr Is countershading camouflage robust to lighting change due to weather?
title_full_unstemmed Is countershading camouflage robust to lighting change due to weather?
title_sort is countershading camouflage robust to lighting change due to weather?
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Countershading is a pattern of coloration thought to have evolved in order to implement camouflage. By adopting a pattern of coloration that makes the surface facing towards the sun darker and the surface facing away from the sun lighter, the overall amount of light reflected off an animal can be made more uniformly bright. Countershading could hence contribute to visual camouflage by increasing background matching or reducing cues to shape. However, the usefulness of countershading is constrained by a particular pattern delivering ‘optimal’ camouflage only for very specific lighting conditions. In this study, we test the robustness of countershading camouflage to lighting change due to weather, using human participants as a ‘generic’ predator. In a simulated three-dimensional environment, we constructed an array of simple leaf-shaped items and a single ellipsoidal target ‘prey’. We set these items in two light environments: strongly directional ‘sunny’ and more diffuse ‘cloudy’. The target object was given the optimal pattern of countershading for one of these two environment types or displayed a uniform pattern. By measuring detection time and accuracy, we explored whether and how target detection depended on the match between the pattern of coloration on the target object and scene lighting. Detection times were longest when the countershading was appropriate to the illumination; incorrectly camouflaged targets were detected with a similar pattern of speed and accuracy to uniformly coloured targets. We conclude that structural changes in light environment, such as caused by differences in weather, do change the effectiveness of countershading camouflage.
topic visual search
search efficiency
shape-from-shading
visual camouflage
countershading
foraging
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.170801
work_keys_str_mv AT olivierpenacchio iscountershadingcamouflagerobusttolightingchangeduetoweather
AT pgeorgelovell iscountershadingcamouflagerobusttolightingchangeduetoweather
AT juliemharris iscountershadingcamouflagerobusttolightingchangeduetoweather
_version_ 1724516472007426048