Birding 2.0: Citizen Science and Effective Monitoring in the Web 2.0 World

The amateur birding community has a long and proud tradition of contributing to bird surveys and bird atlases. Coordinated activities such as Breeding Bird Atlases and the Christmas Bird Count are examples of "citizen science" projects. With the advent of technology, Web 2.0 sites such as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yolanda F. Wiersma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2010-12-01
Series:Avian Conservation and Ecology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ace-eco.org/vol5/iss2/art13/
id doaj-c88a91ad0fe04c71b213467485079ab6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c88a91ad0fe04c71b213467485079ab62020-11-24T23:53:40ZengResilience AllianceAvian Conservation and Ecology1712-65682010-12-01521310.5751/ACE-00427-050213427Birding 2.0: Citizen Science and Effective Monitoring in the Web 2.0 WorldYolanda F. Wiersma0Department of Biology, Memorial UniversityThe amateur birding community has a long and proud tradition of contributing to bird surveys and bird atlases. Coordinated activities such as Breeding Bird Atlases and the Christmas Bird Count are examples of "citizen science" projects. With the advent of technology, Web 2.0 sites such as eBird have been developed to facilitate online sharing of data and thus increase the potential for real-time monitoring. However, as recently articulated in an editorial in this journal and elsewhere, monitoring is best served when based on a priori hypotheses. Harnessing citizen scientists to collect data following a hypothetico-deductive approach carries challenges. Moreover, the use of citizen science in scientific and monitoring studies has raised issues of data accuracy and quality. These issues are compounded when data collection moves into the Web 2.0 world. An examination of the literature from social geography on the concept of "citizen sensors" and volunteered geographic information (VGI) yields thoughtful reflections on the challenges of data quality/data accuracy when applying information from citizen sensors to research and management questions. VGI has been harnessed in a number of contexts, including for environmental and ecological monitoring activities. Here, I argue that conceptualizing a monitoring project as an experiment following the scientific method can further contribute to the use of VGI. I show how principles of experimental design can be applied to monitoring projects to better control for data quality of VGI. This includes suggestions for how citizen sensors can be harnessed to address issues of experimental controls and how to design monitoring projects to increase randomization and replication of sampled data, hence increasing scientific reliability and statistical power.http://www.ace-eco.org/vol5/iss2/art13/citizen sciencecitizen sensorsexperimental designmonitoringvolunteered geographical information (VGI)Web 2.0
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yolanda F. Wiersma
spellingShingle Yolanda F. Wiersma
Birding 2.0: Citizen Science and Effective Monitoring in the Web 2.0 World
Avian Conservation and Ecology
citizen science
citizen sensors
experimental design
monitoring
volunteered geographical information (VGI)
Web 2.0
author_facet Yolanda F. Wiersma
author_sort Yolanda F. Wiersma
title Birding 2.0: Citizen Science and Effective Monitoring in the Web 2.0 World
title_short Birding 2.0: Citizen Science and Effective Monitoring in the Web 2.0 World
title_full Birding 2.0: Citizen Science and Effective Monitoring in the Web 2.0 World
title_fullStr Birding 2.0: Citizen Science and Effective Monitoring in the Web 2.0 World
title_full_unstemmed Birding 2.0: Citizen Science and Effective Monitoring in the Web 2.0 World
title_sort birding 2.0: citizen science and effective monitoring in the web 2.0 world
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Avian Conservation and Ecology
issn 1712-6568
publishDate 2010-12-01
description The amateur birding community has a long and proud tradition of contributing to bird surveys and bird atlases. Coordinated activities such as Breeding Bird Atlases and the Christmas Bird Count are examples of "citizen science" projects. With the advent of technology, Web 2.0 sites such as eBird have been developed to facilitate online sharing of data and thus increase the potential for real-time monitoring. However, as recently articulated in an editorial in this journal and elsewhere, monitoring is best served when based on a priori hypotheses. Harnessing citizen scientists to collect data following a hypothetico-deductive approach carries challenges. Moreover, the use of citizen science in scientific and monitoring studies has raised issues of data accuracy and quality. These issues are compounded when data collection moves into the Web 2.0 world. An examination of the literature from social geography on the concept of "citizen sensors" and volunteered geographic information (VGI) yields thoughtful reflections on the challenges of data quality/data accuracy when applying information from citizen sensors to research and management questions. VGI has been harnessed in a number of contexts, including for environmental and ecological monitoring activities. Here, I argue that conceptualizing a monitoring project as an experiment following the scientific method can further contribute to the use of VGI. I show how principles of experimental design can be applied to monitoring projects to better control for data quality of VGI. This includes suggestions for how citizen sensors can be harnessed to address issues of experimental controls and how to design monitoring projects to increase randomization and replication of sampled data, hence increasing scientific reliability and statistical power.
topic citizen science
citizen sensors
experimental design
monitoring
volunteered geographical information (VGI)
Web 2.0
url http://www.ace-eco.org/vol5/iss2/art13/
work_keys_str_mv AT yolandafwiersma birding20citizenscienceandeffectivemonitoringintheweb20world
_version_ 1716256970638360576