Adaptive Signature Design- review of the biomarker guided adaptive phase –III controlled design

Genomics having a profound impact on oncology drug development necessitates the use of genomic signatures for therapeutic strategy and emerging medicine proposals. Since its advent in the arena of clinical trials biomarker-related predictive methods for the identification and selection of patient su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arinjita Bhattacharyya, Shesh N. Rai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-09-01
Series:Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865418301881
id doaj-c8793ab9254e4225b52fc880065915ac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8793ab9254e4225b52fc880065915ac2020-11-25T02:45:27ZengElsevierContemporary Clinical Trials Communications2451-86542019-09-0115Adaptive Signature Design- review of the biomarker guided adaptive phase –III controlled designArinjita Bhattacharyya0Shesh N. Rai1Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USADepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, JG Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA; The Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA; Corresponding author. The Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.Genomics having a profound impact on oncology drug development necessitates the use of genomic signatures for therapeutic strategy and emerging medicine proposals. Since its advent in the arena of clinical trials biomarker-related predictive methods for the identification and selection of patient subgroups, with optimal treatment response, are widely used. Genetic signatures which are accountable for the differential response to treatments are experimentally recognizable and analytically validated in phase II stage of clinical trials. The availability of robust and validated biomarkers in phase III is limited. Hence, the development of a clinical trial design without the availability of biomarker identity for treatment-sensitive patients becomes indispensable. Adaptive Signature Design (ASD) is a design procedure of developing and validating a predictive classifier (diagnostic testing strategy) when the signature of subjects responding differentially to treatment is remote in the context of the study. This review provides a detailed methodology and statistical background of this pioneering design developed by Freidlin and Simon (2005). In addition, it concentrates on the advances in ASD regarding statistical issues such as predictive assay identification, classification techniques, statistical methods, subgroup search, choice of differentially expressed genes, and multiplicity correction. The statistical methodology behind the design is explained with the intent of building the ground steps for future research approachable, especially for beginning researchers. Most of the existing research articles give a microcosmic view of the design and lack in describing the details behind the methodology. This study covers those details and marks the novelty of our research. Keywords: Adaptive design, Adaptive signature design, Biomarker, Oncology, Precision medicine, Randomized clinical trialshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865418301881
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arinjita Bhattacharyya
Shesh N. Rai
spellingShingle Arinjita Bhattacharyya
Shesh N. Rai
Adaptive Signature Design- review of the biomarker guided adaptive phase –III controlled design
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
author_facet Arinjita Bhattacharyya
Shesh N. Rai
author_sort Arinjita Bhattacharyya
title Adaptive Signature Design- review of the biomarker guided adaptive phase –III controlled design
title_short Adaptive Signature Design- review of the biomarker guided adaptive phase –III controlled design
title_full Adaptive Signature Design- review of the biomarker guided adaptive phase –III controlled design
title_fullStr Adaptive Signature Design- review of the biomarker guided adaptive phase –III controlled design
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive Signature Design- review of the biomarker guided adaptive phase –III controlled design
title_sort adaptive signature design- review of the biomarker guided adaptive phase –iii controlled design
publisher Elsevier
series Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
issn 2451-8654
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Genomics having a profound impact on oncology drug development necessitates the use of genomic signatures for therapeutic strategy and emerging medicine proposals. Since its advent in the arena of clinical trials biomarker-related predictive methods for the identification and selection of patient subgroups, with optimal treatment response, are widely used. Genetic signatures which are accountable for the differential response to treatments are experimentally recognizable and analytically validated in phase II stage of clinical trials. The availability of robust and validated biomarkers in phase III is limited. Hence, the development of a clinical trial design without the availability of biomarker identity for treatment-sensitive patients becomes indispensable. Adaptive Signature Design (ASD) is a design procedure of developing and validating a predictive classifier (diagnostic testing strategy) when the signature of subjects responding differentially to treatment is remote in the context of the study. This review provides a detailed methodology and statistical background of this pioneering design developed by Freidlin and Simon (2005). In addition, it concentrates on the advances in ASD regarding statistical issues such as predictive assay identification, classification techniques, statistical methods, subgroup search, choice of differentially expressed genes, and multiplicity correction. The statistical methodology behind the design is explained with the intent of building the ground steps for future research approachable, especially for beginning researchers. Most of the existing research articles give a microcosmic view of the design and lack in describing the details behind the methodology. This study covers those details and marks the novelty of our research. Keywords: Adaptive design, Adaptive signature design, Biomarker, Oncology, Precision medicine, Randomized clinical trials
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865418301881
work_keys_str_mv AT arinjitabhattacharyya adaptivesignaturedesignreviewofthebiomarkerguidedadaptivephaseiiicontrolleddesign
AT sheshnrai adaptivesignaturedesignreviewofthebiomarkerguidedadaptivephaseiiicontrolleddesign
_version_ 1724762718141939712