The increasing concentration at industrial markets: the social welfare maximization and possible risks

The paper considers impact of entry barriers on the social welfare. Despite the common opinion that entry barriers are always bad, the excessive number of firms means, all pros aside, duplicated fixed costs. It is shown that the socially effective number of firms is smaller than the equilibrium one...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filatov Alexander, Makolskaya Yana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173501073
id doaj-c86b3678ecba4ed8a864a1ce1877637e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c86b3678ecba4ed8a864a1ce1877637e2021-04-02T10:52:16ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242017-01-01350107310.1051/shsconf/20173501073shsconf_icie2017_01073The increasing concentration at industrial markets: the social welfare maximization and possible risksFilatov AlexanderMakolskaya Yana0Irkutsk State University, Institute of Mathematics, Economics, and InformaticsThe paper considers impact of entry barriers on the social welfare. Despite the common opinion that entry barriers are always bad, the excessive number of firms means, all pros aside, duplicated fixed costs. It is shown that the socially effective number of firms is smaller than the equilibrium one for the wide spectre of demand and cost functions, and also for different strategies of companies’ behavior. This proposition is satisfied for the homogeneous product markets where output of each company decreases when the number of firms increases, and competition gets stronger. But there is the considerable danger of the increasing probability of collusion in a situation of number of firms limitation. We show that collusion is less dangerous than duplicated fixed costs if the gap between the «choke price» and marginal costs is less than a certain critical value connected with the share of fixed costs. The empirical research on the base of the financial statistics of the biggest world corporations of different industries is carried out.https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173501073
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Filatov Alexander
Makolskaya Yana
spellingShingle Filatov Alexander
Makolskaya Yana
The increasing concentration at industrial markets: the social welfare maximization and possible risks
SHS Web of Conferences
author_facet Filatov Alexander
Makolskaya Yana
author_sort Filatov Alexander
title The increasing concentration at industrial markets: the social welfare maximization and possible risks
title_short The increasing concentration at industrial markets: the social welfare maximization and possible risks
title_full The increasing concentration at industrial markets: the social welfare maximization and possible risks
title_fullStr The increasing concentration at industrial markets: the social welfare maximization and possible risks
title_full_unstemmed The increasing concentration at industrial markets: the social welfare maximization and possible risks
title_sort increasing concentration at industrial markets: the social welfare maximization and possible risks
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The paper considers impact of entry barriers on the social welfare. Despite the common opinion that entry barriers are always bad, the excessive number of firms means, all pros aside, duplicated fixed costs. It is shown that the socially effective number of firms is smaller than the equilibrium one for the wide spectre of demand and cost functions, and also for different strategies of companies’ behavior. This proposition is satisfied for the homogeneous product markets where output of each company decreases when the number of firms increases, and competition gets stronger. But there is the considerable danger of the increasing probability of collusion in a situation of number of firms limitation. We show that collusion is less dangerous than duplicated fixed costs if the gap between the «choke price» and marginal costs is less than a certain critical value connected with the share of fixed costs. The empirical research on the base of the financial statistics of the biggest world corporations of different industries is carried out.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173501073
work_keys_str_mv AT filatovalexander theincreasingconcentrationatindustrialmarketsthesocialwelfaremaximizationandpossiblerisks
AT makolskayayana theincreasingconcentrationatindustrialmarketsthesocialwelfaremaximizationandpossiblerisks
AT filatovalexander increasingconcentrationatindustrialmarketsthesocialwelfaremaximizationandpossiblerisks
AT makolskayayana increasingconcentrationatindustrialmarketsthesocialwelfaremaximizationandpossiblerisks
_version_ 1724166595734929408