Very large Atrial Septal Defect Device Closure: Feasibility and safety

Objectives: There is limited data regarding feasibility and safety of very large ASD devices deployment. Percutaneous closure of very large atrial septal defect (ASD) is a valid alternative to surgical approach.  But complications like erosion, cardiac perforation, atrioventricular block, pericardi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Goutam Datta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indonesian Heart Association 2021-09-01
Series:Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijconline.id/index.php/ijc/article/view/1121
id doaj-c85de0ad2a874c049a95ad0759e2ae60
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c85de0ad2a874c049a95ad0759e2ae602021-09-18T09:18:43ZengIndonesian Heart AssociationMajalah Kardiologi Indonesia0126-37732620-47622021-09-0142210.30701/ijc.1121Very large Atrial Septal Defect Device Closure: Feasibility and safetyGoutam Datta0Burdwan medical college Objectives: There is limited data regarding feasibility and safety of very large ASD devices deployment. Percutaneous closure of very large atrial septal defect (ASD) is a valid alternative to surgical approach.  But complications like erosion, cardiac perforation, atrioventricular block, pericardial effusion, infective endocarditis, or cardiac arrhythmias may occur following ASD device closure.  Methods: Forty four patients with very large ostium secundum ASD were studied in a tertiary medical centre. Adult patients with defect size of 38 mm or more and device size of 40 mm or more were selected for device closure. Patients having suitable anatomy, significant left to right shunt(>1.5:1) ,right ventricular volume overload and without significant pulmonary arterial hypertension were chosen for device closure. Results : There were thirty six  female patients and  eight  male patients in our study. Majority of our patients (twenty four) were in forty to fifty years age group. Device could be deployed successfully in forty two (95.5%).  Twelve patients had device size of 46 mm (27%). Eight patients had 44 mm devices(18%). Forty two millimeter devices were used in sixteen patients (36%). Eight  patients had device size of  40 mm(18%).Device embolization occurred in two patients. There were two cases of pericardial effusion and pericardiocentesis was needed in one patients. Transient complete heart block was seen in one patient. Four patients had suffered from transient and self terminating atrial arrhythmias. There was no mortality or erosion in our study. Conclusion: Percutaneous closure of very large ASD is feasible and associated with low complication rate https://ijconline.id/index.php/ijc/article/view/1121ASD device closure, very large devices, complications.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Goutam Datta
spellingShingle Goutam Datta
Very large Atrial Septal Defect Device Closure: Feasibility and safety
Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia
ASD device closure, very large devices, complications.
author_facet Goutam Datta
author_sort Goutam Datta
title Very large Atrial Septal Defect Device Closure: Feasibility and safety
title_short Very large Atrial Septal Defect Device Closure: Feasibility and safety
title_full Very large Atrial Septal Defect Device Closure: Feasibility and safety
title_fullStr Very large Atrial Septal Defect Device Closure: Feasibility and safety
title_full_unstemmed Very large Atrial Septal Defect Device Closure: Feasibility and safety
title_sort very large atrial septal defect device closure: feasibility and safety
publisher Indonesian Heart Association
series Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia
issn 0126-3773
2620-4762
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Objectives: There is limited data regarding feasibility and safety of very large ASD devices deployment. Percutaneous closure of very large atrial septal defect (ASD) is a valid alternative to surgical approach.  But complications like erosion, cardiac perforation, atrioventricular block, pericardial effusion, infective endocarditis, or cardiac arrhythmias may occur following ASD device closure.  Methods: Forty four patients with very large ostium secundum ASD were studied in a tertiary medical centre. Adult patients with defect size of 38 mm or more and device size of 40 mm or more were selected for device closure. Patients having suitable anatomy, significant left to right shunt(>1.5:1) ,right ventricular volume overload and without significant pulmonary arterial hypertension were chosen for device closure. Results : There were thirty six  female patients and  eight  male patients in our study. Majority of our patients (twenty four) were in forty to fifty years age group. Device could be deployed successfully in forty two (95.5%).  Twelve patients had device size of 46 mm (27%). Eight patients had 44 mm devices(18%). Forty two millimeter devices were used in sixteen patients (36%). Eight  patients had device size of  40 mm(18%).Device embolization occurred in two patients. There were two cases of pericardial effusion and pericardiocentesis was needed in one patients. Transient complete heart block was seen in one patient. Four patients had suffered from transient and self terminating atrial arrhythmias. There was no mortality or erosion in our study. Conclusion: Percutaneous closure of very large ASD is feasible and associated with low complication rate
topic ASD device closure, very large devices, complications.
url https://ijconline.id/index.php/ijc/article/view/1121
work_keys_str_mv AT goutamdatta verylargeatrialseptaldefectdeviceclosurefeasibilityandsafety
_version_ 1717377012995194880