The Impact of Pixel Resolution, Integration Scale, Preprocessing, and Feature Normalization on Texture Analysis for Mass Classification in Mammograms

Texture analysis methods are widely used to characterize breast masses in mammograms. Texture gives information about the spatial arrangement of the intensities in the region of interest. This information has been used in mammogram analysis applications such as mass detection, mass classification, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Abdel-Nasser, Jaime Melendez, Antonio Moreno, Domenec Puig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:International Journal of Optics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1370259
id doaj-c84ba7bee8464c5cbcd884a08fa1e178
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c84ba7bee8464c5cbcd884a08fa1e1782020-11-24T21:28:25ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Optics1687-93841687-93922016-01-01201610.1155/2016/13702591370259The Impact of Pixel Resolution, Integration Scale, Preprocessing, and Feature Normalization on Texture Analysis for Mass Classification in MammogramsMohamed Abdel-Nasser0Jaime Melendez1Antonio Moreno2Domenec Puig3Departament d’Enginyeria Informàtica i Matemàtiques, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Avinguda Paisos Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, SpainDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, NetherlandsDepartament d’Enginyeria Informàtica i Matemàtiques, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Avinguda Paisos Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, SpainDepartament d’Enginyeria Informàtica i Matemàtiques, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Avinguda Paisos Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, SpainTexture analysis methods are widely used to characterize breast masses in mammograms. Texture gives information about the spatial arrangement of the intensities in the region of interest. This information has been used in mammogram analysis applications such as mass detection, mass classification, and breast density estimation. In this paper, we study the effect of factors such as pixel resolution, integration scale, preprocessing, and feature normalization on the performance of those texture methods for mass classification. The classification performance was assessed considering linear and nonlinear support vector machine classifiers. To find the best combination among the studied factors, we used three approaches: greedy, sequential forward selection (SFS), and exhaustive search. On the basis of our study, we conclude that the factors studied affect the performance of texture methods, so the best combination of these factors should be determined to achieve the best performance with each texture method. SFS can be an appropriate way to approach the factor combination problem because it is less computationally intensive than the other methods.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1370259
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohamed Abdel-Nasser
Jaime Melendez
Antonio Moreno
Domenec Puig
spellingShingle Mohamed Abdel-Nasser
Jaime Melendez
Antonio Moreno
Domenec Puig
The Impact of Pixel Resolution, Integration Scale, Preprocessing, and Feature Normalization on Texture Analysis for Mass Classification in Mammograms
International Journal of Optics
author_facet Mohamed Abdel-Nasser
Jaime Melendez
Antonio Moreno
Domenec Puig
author_sort Mohamed Abdel-Nasser
title The Impact of Pixel Resolution, Integration Scale, Preprocessing, and Feature Normalization on Texture Analysis for Mass Classification in Mammograms
title_short The Impact of Pixel Resolution, Integration Scale, Preprocessing, and Feature Normalization on Texture Analysis for Mass Classification in Mammograms
title_full The Impact of Pixel Resolution, Integration Scale, Preprocessing, and Feature Normalization on Texture Analysis for Mass Classification in Mammograms
title_fullStr The Impact of Pixel Resolution, Integration Scale, Preprocessing, and Feature Normalization on Texture Analysis for Mass Classification in Mammograms
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Pixel Resolution, Integration Scale, Preprocessing, and Feature Normalization on Texture Analysis for Mass Classification in Mammograms
title_sort impact of pixel resolution, integration scale, preprocessing, and feature normalization on texture analysis for mass classification in mammograms
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Optics
issn 1687-9384
1687-9392
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Texture analysis methods are widely used to characterize breast masses in mammograms. Texture gives information about the spatial arrangement of the intensities in the region of interest. This information has been used in mammogram analysis applications such as mass detection, mass classification, and breast density estimation. In this paper, we study the effect of factors such as pixel resolution, integration scale, preprocessing, and feature normalization on the performance of those texture methods for mass classification. The classification performance was assessed considering linear and nonlinear support vector machine classifiers. To find the best combination among the studied factors, we used three approaches: greedy, sequential forward selection (SFS), and exhaustive search. On the basis of our study, we conclude that the factors studied affect the performance of texture methods, so the best combination of these factors should be determined to achieve the best performance with each texture method. SFS can be an appropriate way to approach the factor combination problem because it is less computationally intensive than the other methods.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1370259
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedabdelnasser theimpactofpixelresolutionintegrationscalepreprocessingandfeaturenormalizationontextureanalysisformassclassificationinmammograms
AT jaimemelendez theimpactofpixelresolutionintegrationscalepreprocessingandfeaturenormalizationontextureanalysisformassclassificationinmammograms
AT antoniomoreno theimpactofpixelresolutionintegrationscalepreprocessingandfeaturenormalizationontextureanalysisformassclassificationinmammograms
AT domenecpuig theimpactofpixelresolutionintegrationscalepreprocessingandfeaturenormalizationontextureanalysisformassclassificationinmammograms
AT mohamedabdelnasser impactofpixelresolutionintegrationscalepreprocessingandfeaturenormalizationontextureanalysisformassclassificationinmammograms
AT jaimemelendez impactofpixelresolutionintegrationscalepreprocessingandfeaturenormalizationontextureanalysisformassclassificationinmammograms
AT antoniomoreno impactofpixelresolutionintegrationscalepreprocessingandfeaturenormalizationontextureanalysisformassclassificationinmammograms
AT domenecpuig impactofpixelresolutionintegrationscalepreprocessingandfeaturenormalizationontextureanalysisformassclassificationinmammograms
_version_ 1725970546928123904