Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia

In 1979, Australia’s then-Communication Minister Tony Staley commented that the introduction of satellite communications to the bush would “dispel the dis-tance – mental as well as geographical – between urban and regional dwellers, between the haves and the have-nots in a communication society” (St...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lelia Green
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linköping University Electronic Press 2010-06-01
Series:Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1029131
id doaj-c8338a501659460c981bb4d677cfd678
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8338a501659460c981bb4d677cfd6782020-11-25T01:44:26ZengLinköping University Electronic PressCulture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research2000-15252010-06-012131152Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western AustraliaLelia GreenIn 1979, Australia’s then-Communication Minister Tony Staley commented that the introduction of satellite communications to the bush would “dispel the dis-tance – mental as well as geographical – between urban and regional dwellers, between the haves and the have-nots in a communication society” (Staley 1979: 2225, 2228-9). In saying this, Staley imagined a marginalised and disadvantaged audience of “have-nots”, paying for their isolation in terms of their mental dis-tance from the networked communications of the core. This paper uses ethnographic audience studies surveys and interviews (1986-9) to examine the validity of Staley’s imaginations in terms of four communication technologies: the telephone, broadcast radio, 2-way radio and the satellite. The notion of a mental difference is highly problematic for the remote audience. Inso-far as a perception of lack and of difference is accepted, it is taken to reflect the perspective and the product of the urban policy-maker. Far from accepting the “distance” promulgated from the core, remote audiences see such statements as indicating an ignorance of the complexity and sophistica-tion of communications in an environment where the stakes are higher and the options fewer. This is not to say that remote people were not keen to acquire satel-lite services – they were – it is to say that when they imagined such services it was in terms of equity and interconnections, rather than the “dispelling of distance”.http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1029131Mediaruralityradiosatellite broadcastingAustralia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lelia Green
spellingShingle Lelia Green
Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia
Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
Media
rurality
radio
satellite broadcasting
Australia
author_facet Lelia Green
author_sort Lelia Green
title Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia
title_short Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia
title_full Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia
title_fullStr Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia
title_full_unstemmed Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia
title_sort imagining rural audiences in remote western australia
publisher Linköping University Electronic Press
series Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
issn 2000-1525
publishDate 2010-06-01
description In 1979, Australia’s then-Communication Minister Tony Staley commented that the introduction of satellite communications to the bush would “dispel the dis-tance – mental as well as geographical – between urban and regional dwellers, between the haves and the have-nots in a communication society” (Staley 1979: 2225, 2228-9). In saying this, Staley imagined a marginalised and disadvantaged audience of “have-nots”, paying for their isolation in terms of their mental dis-tance from the networked communications of the core. This paper uses ethnographic audience studies surveys and interviews (1986-9) to examine the validity of Staley’s imaginations in terms of four communication technologies: the telephone, broadcast radio, 2-way radio and the satellite. The notion of a mental difference is highly problematic for the remote audience. Inso-far as a perception of lack and of difference is accepted, it is taken to reflect the perspective and the product of the urban policy-maker. Far from accepting the “distance” promulgated from the core, remote audiences see such statements as indicating an ignorance of the complexity and sophistica-tion of communications in an environment where the stakes are higher and the options fewer. This is not to say that remote people were not keen to acquire satel-lite services – they were – it is to say that when they imagined such services it was in terms of equity and interconnections, rather than the “dispelling of distance”.
topic Media
rurality
radio
satellite broadcasting
Australia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1029131
work_keys_str_mv AT leliagreen imaginingruralaudiencesinremotewesternaustralia
_version_ 1725028749131382784