Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia
In 1979, Australia’s then-Communication Minister Tony Staley commented that the introduction of satellite communications to the bush would “dispel the dis-tance – mental as well as geographical – between urban and regional dwellers, between the haves and the have-nots in a communication society” (St...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Linköping University Electronic Press
2010-06-01
|
Series: | Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1029131 |
id |
doaj-c8338a501659460c981bb4d677cfd678 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c8338a501659460c981bb4d677cfd6782020-11-25T01:44:26ZengLinköping University Electronic PressCulture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research2000-15252010-06-012131152Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western AustraliaLelia GreenIn 1979, Australia’s then-Communication Minister Tony Staley commented that the introduction of satellite communications to the bush would “dispel the dis-tance – mental as well as geographical – between urban and regional dwellers, between the haves and the have-nots in a communication society” (Staley 1979: 2225, 2228-9). In saying this, Staley imagined a marginalised and disadvantaged audience of “have-nots”, paying for their isolation in terms of their mental dis-tance from the networked communications of the core. This paper uses ethnographic audience studies surveys and interviews (1986-9) to examine the validity of Staley’s imaginations in terms of four communication technologies: the telephone, broadcast radio, 2-way radio and the satellite. The notion of a mental difference is highly problematic for the remote audience. Inso-far as a perception of lack and of difference is accepted, it is taken to reflect the perspective and the product of the urban policy-maker. Far from accepting the “distance” promulgated from the core, remote audiences see such statements as indicating an ignorance of the complexity and sophistica-tion of communications in an environment where the stakes are higher and the options fewer. This is not to say that remote people were not keen to acquire satel-lite services – they were – it is to say that when they imagined such services it was in terms of equity and interconnections, rather than the “dispelling of distance”.http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1029131Mediaruralityradiosatellite broadcastingAustralia |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lelia Green |
spellingShingle |
Lelia Green Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research Media rurality radio satellite broadcasting Australia |
author_facet |
Lelia Green |
author_sort |
Lelia Green |
title |
Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia |
title_short |
Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia |
title_full |
Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia |
title_fullStr |
Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Imagining Rural Audiences in Remote Western Australia |
title_sort |
imagining rural audiences in remote western australia |
publisher |
Linköping University Electronic Press |
series |
Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research |
issn |
2000-1525 |
publishDate |
2010-06-01 |
description |
In 1979, Australia’s then-Communication Minister Tony Staley commented that the introduction of satellite communications to the bush would “dispel the dis-tance – mental as well as geographical – between urban and regional dwellers, between the haves and the have-nots in a communication society” (Staley 1979: 2225, 2228-9). In saying this, Staley imagined a marginalised and disadvantaged audience of “have-nots”, paying for their isolation in terms of their mental dis-tance from the networked communications of the core. This paper uses ethnographic audience studies surveys and interviews (1986-9) to examine the validity of Staley’s imaginations in terms of four communication technologies: the telephone, broadcast radio, 2-way radio and the satellite. The notion of a mental difference is highly problematic for the remote audience. Inso-far as a perception of lack and of difference is accepted, it is taken to reflect the perspective and the product of the urban policy-maker. Far from accepting the “distance” promulgated from the core, remote audiences see such statements as indicating an ignorance of the complexity and sophistica-tion of communications in an environment where the stakes are higher and the options fewer. This is not to say that remote people were not keen to acquire satel-lite services – they were – it is to say that when they imagined such services it was in terms of equity and interconnections, rather than the “dispelling of distance”. |
topic |
Media rurality radio satellite broadcasting Australia |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1029131 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leliagreen imaginingruralaudiencesinremotewesternaustralia |
_version_ |
1725028749131382784 |