“Désormais…” Essai sur les fonctions argumentatives d’un marqueur de rupture temporelle

The analysis of contemporary debates suggests that an important part of the participants’ discursive activity is devoted to a strategy of framing that seeks to propose a certain interpretative context for the exchange of arguments. One of the stakes of such a framing activity is to endow the confron...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francis Chateauraynaud, Marianne Doury
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: University of Tel-Aviv 2010-04-01
Series:Argumentation et Analyse du Discours
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/aad/772
id doaj-c80ddc31e1514eaaa897c267a097b17b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c80ddc31e1514eaaa897c267a097b17b2020-11-24T22:08:43ZfraUniversity of Tel-AvivArgumentation et Analyse du Discours1565-89612010-04-01410.4000/aad.772“Désormais…” Essai sur les fonctions argumentatives d’un marqueur de rupture temporelleFrancis ChateauraynaudMarianne DouryThe analysis of contemporary debates suggests that an important part of the participants’ discursive activity is devoted to a strategy of framing that seeks to propose a certain interpretative context for the exchange of arguments. One of the stakes of such a framing activity is to endow the confrontation with a significant temporality. This paper combines insights of the sociology of controversies with argumentation studies in order to account for the way in which the actors and their lines of arguments are mapped strategically onto a discursive temporality (specifying what is deemed obsolete, what is forecast, what is stigmatized as implausible or impossible). Symmetrically, it shows how the ways of arguing and the treatment of time develop in the course of the ongoing debates. Starting from the use of the French adverb “désormais” in the Preamble of the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen, we extend our analysis to contemporary controversies concerning GMOs, asbestos, nanotechnology, nuclear energy. We show that paying attention to such a temporal marker provides good indications about the way in which the participants themselves construct the decisive moments of the debate by emphasizing the nature of the event at the start of such a turning point, or by pointing to the characterization of the new era that has just began.http://journals.openedition.org/aad/772adverbs of timecontroversyframingtemporality“from now on”
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francis Chateauraynaud
Marianne Doury
spellingShingle Francis Chateauraynaud
Marianne Doury
“Désormais…” Essai sur les fonctions argumentatives d’un marqueur de rupture temporelle
Argumentation et Analyse du Discours
adverbs of time
controversy
framing
temporality
“from now on”
author_facet Francis Chateauraynaud
Marianne Doury
author_sort Francis Chateauraynaud
title “Désormais…” Essai sur les fonctions argumentatives d’un marqueur de rupture temporelle
title_short “Désormais…” Essai sur les fonctions argumentatives d’un marqueur de rupture temporelle
title_full “Désormais…” Essai sur les fonctions argumentatives d’un marqueur de rupture temporelle
title_fullStr “Désormais…” Essai sur les fonctions argumentatives d’un marqueur de rupture temporelle
title_full_unstemmed “Désormais…” Essai sur les fonctions argumentatives d’un marqueur de rupture temporelle
title_sort “désormais…” essai sur les fonctions argumentatives d’un marqueur de rupture temporelle
publisher University of Tel-Aviv
series Argumentation et Analyse du Discours
issn 1565-8961
publishDate 2010-04-01
description The analysis of contemporary debates suggests that an important part of the participants’ discursive activity is devoted to a strategy of framing that seeks to propose a certain interpretative context for the exchange of arguments. One of the stakes of such a framing activity is to endow the confrontation with a significant temporality. This paper combines insights of the sociology of controversies with argumentation studies in order to account for the way in which the actors and their lines of arguments are mapped strategically onto a discursive temporality (specifying what is deemed obsolete, what is forecast, what is stigmatized as implausible or impossible). Symmetrically, it shows how the ways of arguing and the treatment of time develop in the course of the ongoing debates. Starting from the use of the French adverb “désormais” in the Preamble of the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen, we extend our analysis to contemporary controversies concerning GMOs, asbestos, nanotechnology, nuclear energy. We show that paying attention to such a temporal marker provides good indications about the way in which the participants themselves construct the decisive moments of the debate by emphasizing the nature of the event at the start of such a turning point, or by pointing to the characterization of the new era that has just began.
topic adverbs of time
controversy
framing
temporality
“from now on”
url http://journals.openedition.org/aad/772
work_keys_str_mv AT francischateauraynaud desormaisessaisurlesfonctionsargumentativesdunmarqueurderupturetemporelle
AT mariannedoury desormaisessaisurlesfonctionsargumentativesdunmarqueurderupturetemporelle
_version_ 1725815118701264896