Forest landscape restoration: state of play
Tree planting has been widely touted as an inexpensive way to meet multiple international environmental goals for mitigating climate change, reversing landscape degradation and restoring biodiversity restoration. The Bonn Challenge and New York Declaration on Forests, motivated by widespread defores...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.201218 |
id |
doaj-c80d9d6f8b0a4b82afb5f5ac5c131290 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c80d9d6f8b0a4b82afb5f5ac5c1312902021-01-28T14:45:35ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032020-12-0171210.1098/rsos.201218201218Forest landscape restoration: state of playJohn A. StanturfStephanie MansourianTree planting has been widely touted as an inexpensive way to meet multiple international environmental goals for mitigating climate change, reversing landscape degradation and restoring biodiversity restoration. The Bonn Challenge and New York Declaration on Forests, motivated by widespread deforestation and forest degradation, call for restoring 350 million ha by 2030 by relying on forest landscape restoration (FLR) processes. Because the 173 million ha commitments made by 63 nations, regions and companies are not legally binding, expectations of what FLR means lacks consensus. The frequent disconnect between top-level aspirations and on-the-ground implementation results in limited data on FLR activities. Additionally, some countries have made landscape-scale restoration outside of the Bonn Challenge. We compared and contrasted the theory and practice of FLR and compiled information from databases of projects and initiatives and case studies. We present the main FLR initiatives happening across regional groups; in many regions, the potential need/opportunity for forest restoration exceeds the FLR activities underway. Multiple objectives can be met by manipulating vegetation (increasing structural complexity, changing species composition and restoring natural disturbances). Livelihood interventions are context-specific but include collecting or raising non-timber forest products, employment and community forests; other interventions address tenure and governance.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.201218bonn challengenew york declaration on forestsdegradationdeforestationecosystem functioningsustainable development goals |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
John A. Stanturf Stephanie Mansourian |
spellingShingle |
John A. Stanturf Stephanie Mansourian Forest landscape restoration: state of play Royal Society Open Science bonn challenge new york declaration on forests degradation deforestation ecosystem functioning sustainable development goals |
author_facet |
John A. Stanturf Stephanie Mansourian |
author_sort |
John A. Stanturf |
title |
Forest landscape restoration: state of play |
title_short |
Forest landscape restoration: state of play |
title_full |
Forest landscape restoration: state of play |
title_fullStr |
Forest landscape restoration: state of play |
title_full_unstemmed |
Forest landscape restoration: state of play |
title_sort |
forest landscape restoration: state of play |
publisher |
The Royal Society |
series |
Royal Society Open Science |
issn |
2054-5703 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Tree planting has been widely touted as an inexpensive way to meet multiple international environmental goals for mitigating climate change, reversing landscape degradation and restoring biodiversity restoration. The Bonn Challenge and New York Declaration on Forests, motivated by widespread deforestation and forest degradation, call for restoring 350 million ha by 2030 by relying on forest landscape restoration (FLR) processes. Because the 173 million ha commitments made by 63 nations, regions and companies are not legally binding, expectations of what FLR means lacks consensus. The frequent disconnect between top-level aspirations and on-the-ground implementation results in limited data on FLR activities. Additionally, some countries have made landscape-scale restoration outside of the Bonn Challenge. We compared and contrasted the theory and practice of FLR and compiled information from databases of projects and initiatives and case studies. We present the main FLR initiatives happening across regional groups; in many regions, the potential need/opportunity for forest restoration exceeds the FLR activities underway. Multiple objectives can be met by manipulating vegetation (increasing structural complexity, changing species composition and restoring natural disturbances). Livelihood interventions are context-specific but include collecting or raising non-timber forest products, employment and community forests; other interventions address tenure and governance. |
topic |
bonn challenge new york declaration on forests degradation deforestation ecosystem functioning sustainable development goals |
url |
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.201218 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johnastanturf forestlandscaperestorationstateofplay AT stephaniemansourian forestlandscaperestorationstateofplay |
_version_ |
1724319675683176448 |