Reversed Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation following Motor Training That Vary as a Function of Training-Induced Changes in Corticospinal Excitability

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has the potential to enhance corticospinal excitability (CSE) and subsequent motor learning. However, the effects of iTBS following motor learning are unknown. The purpose of the present study was to expl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tino Stöckel, Jeffery J. Summers, Mark R. Hinder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/578620
id doaj-c80ce00a531f4ab0a5fb8ed0e74b5ec9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c80ce00a531f4ab0a5fb8ed0e74b5ec92020-11-24T21:05:52ZengHindawi LimitedNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432015-01-01201510.1155/2015/578620578620Reversed Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation following Motor Training That Vary as a Function of Training-Induced Changes in Corticospinal ExcitabilityTino Stöckel0Jeffery J. Summers1Mark R. Hinder2Human Motor Control Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 30, Hobart, TAS 7001, AustraliaHuman Motor Control Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 30, Hobart, TAS 7001, AustraliaHuman Motor Control Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 30, Hobart, TAS 7001, AustraliaIntermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has the potential to enhance corticospinal excitability (CSE) and subsequent motor learning. However, the effects of iTBS following motor learning are unknown. The purpose of the present study was to explore the effect of iTBS on CSE and performance following motor learning. Therefore twenty-four healthy participants practiced a ballistic motor task for a total of 150 movements. iTBS was subsequently applied to the trained motor cortex (STIM group) or the vertex (SHAM group). Performance and CSE were assessed before motor learning and before and after iTBS. Training significantly increased performance and CSE in both groups. In STIM group participants, subsequent iTBS significantly reduced motor performance with smaller reductions in CSE. CSE changes as a result of motor learning were negatively correlated with both the CSE changes and performance changes as a result of iTBS. No significant effects of iTBS were found for SHAM group participants. We conclude that iTBS has the potential to degrade prior motor learning as a function of training-induced CSE changes. That means the expected LTP-like effects of iTBS are reversed following motor learning.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/578620
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tino Stöckel
Jeffery J. Summers
Mark R. Hinder
spellingShingle Tino Stöckel
Jeffery J. Summers
Mark R. Hinder
Reversed Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation following Motor Training That Vary as a Function of Training-Induced Changes in Corticospinal Excitability
Neural Plasticity
author_facet Tino Stöckel
Jeffery J. Summers
Mark R. Hinder
author_sort Tino Stöckel
title Reversed Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation following Motor Training That Vary as a Function of Training-Induced Changes in Corticospinal Excitability
title_short Reversed Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation following Motor Training That Vary as a Function of Training-Induced Changes in Corticospinal Excitability
title_full Reversed Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation following Motor Training That Vary as a Function of Training-Induced Changes in Corticospinal Excitability
title_fullStr Reversed Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation following Motor Training That Vary as a Function of Training-Induced Changes in Corticospinal Excitability
title_full_unstemmed Reversed Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation following Motor Training That Vary as a Function of Training-Induced Changes in Corticospinal Excitability
title_sort reversed effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation following motor training that vary as a function of training-induced changes in corticospinal excitability
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Neural Plasticity
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has the potential to enhance corticospinal excitability (CSE) and subsequent motor learning. However, the effects of iTBS following motor learning are unknown. The purpose of the present study was to explore the effect of iTBS on CSE and performance following motor learning. Therefore twenty-four healthy participants practiced a ballistic motor task for a total of 150 movements. iTBS was subsequently applied to the trained motor cortex (STIM group) or the vertex (SHAM group). Performance and CSE were assessed before motor learning and before and after iTBS. Training significantly increased performance and CSE in both groups. In STIM group participants, subsequent iTBS significantly reduced motor performance with smaller reductions in CSE. CSE changes as a result of motor learning were negatively correlated with both the CSE changes and performance changes as a result of iTBS. No significant effects of iTBS were found for SHAM group participants. We conclude that iTBS has the potential to degrade prior motor learning as a function of training-induced CSE changes. That means the expected LTP-like effects of iTBS are reversed following motor learning.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/578620
work_keys_str_mv AT tinostockel reversedeffectsofintermittentthetaburststimulationfollowingmotortrainingthatvaryasafunctionoftraininginducedchangesincorticospinalexcitability
AT jefferyjsummers reversedeffectsofintermittentthetaburststimulationfollowingmotortrainingthatvaryasafunctionoftraininginducedchangesincorticospinalexcitability
AT markrhinder reversedeffectsofintermittentthetaburststimulationfollowingmotortrainingthatvaryasafunctionoftraininginducedchangesincorticospinalexcitability
_version_ 1716767634810208256