Observational study to assess the effects of social networks on the seasonal influenza vaccine uptake by early career doctors

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of social network influences on seasonal influenza vaccination uptake by healthcare workers.DesignCross-sectional, observational study.SettingA large secondary care NHS Trust which includes four hospital sites in Greater Manchester.ParticipantsFoundation doctors (FDs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel Isba, Thomas Keegan, Rhiannon Edge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e026997.full
id doaj-c80b091614824f88a1b652b9040fe055
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c80b091614824f88a1b652b9040fe0552021-03-22T09:03:14ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-08-019810.1136/bmjopen-2018-026997Observational study to assess the effects of social networks on the seasonal influenza vaccine uptake by early career doctorsRachel Isba0Thomas KeeganRhiannon Edge11 Emergency Department, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK 2 Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UKObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of social network influences on seasonal influenza vaccination uptake by healthcare workers.DesignCross-sectional, observational study.SettingA large secondary care NHS Trust which includes four hospital sites in Greater Manchester.ParticipantsFoundation doctors (FDs) working at the Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust during the study period. Data collection took place during compulsory weekly teaching sessions, and there were no exclusions. Of the 200 eligible FDs, 138 (70%) provided complete data.Primary outcome measuresSelf-reported seasonal influenza vaccination status.ResultsAmong participants, 100 (72%) reported that they had received a seasonal influenza vaccination. Statistical modelling demonstrated that having a higher proportion of vaccinated neighbours increased an individual’s likelihood of being vaccinated. The coefficient for γ, the social network parameter, was 0.965 (95% CI: 0.248 to 1.682; odds: 2.625 (95% CI: 1.281 to 5.376)), that is, a diffusion effect. Adjusting for year group, geographical area and sex did not account for this effect.ConclusionsThis population exhibited higher than expected vaccination coverage levels–providing protection both in the workplace and for vulnerable patients. The modelling approach allowed covariate effects to be incorporated into social network analysis which gave us a better understanding of the network structure. These techniques have a range of applications in understanding the role of social networks on health behaviours.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e026997.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rachel Isba
Thomas Keegan
Rhiannon Edge
spellingShingle Rachel Isba
Thomas Keegan
Rhiannon Edge
Observational study to assess the effects of social networks on the seasonal influenza vaccine uptake by early career doctors
BMJ Open
author_facet Rachel Isba
Thomas Keegan
Rhiannon Edge
author_sort Rachel Isba
title Observational study to assess the effects of social networks on the seasonal influenza vaccine uptake by early career doctors
title_short Observational study to assess the effects of social networks on the seasonal influenza vaccine uptake by early career doctors
title_full Observational study to assess the effects of social networks on the seasonal influenza vaccine uptake by early career doctors
title_fullStr Observational study to assess the effects of social networks on the seasonal influenza vaccine uptake by early career doctors
title_full_unstemmed Observational study to assess the effects of social networks on the seasonal influenza vaccine uptake by early career doctors
title_sort observational study to assess the effects of social networks on the seasonal influenza vaccine uptake by early career doctors
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2019-08-01
description ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of social network influences on seasonal influenza vaccination uptake by healthcare workers.DesignCross-sectional, observational study.SettingA large secondary care NHS Trust which includes four hospital sites in Greater Manchester.ParticipantsFoundation doctors (FDs) working at the Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust during the study period. Data collection took place during compulsory weekly teaching sessions, and there were no exclusions. Of the 200 eligible FDs, 138 (70%) provided complete data.Primary outcome measuresSelf-reported seasonal influenza vaccination status.ResultsAmong participants, 100 (72%) reported that they had received a seasonal influenza vaccination. Statistical modelling demonstrated that having a higher proportion of vaccinated neighbours increased an individual’s likelihood of being vaccinated. The coefficient for γ, the social network parameter, was 0.965 (95% CI: 0.248 to 1.682; odds: 2.625 (95% CI: 1.281 to 5.376)), that is, a diffusion effect. Adjusting for year group, geographical area and sex did not account for this effect.ConclusionsThis population exhibited higher than expected vaccination coverage levels–providing protection both in the workplace and for vulnerable patients. The modelling approach allowed covariate effects to be incorporated into social network analysis which gave us a better understanding of the network structure. These techniques have a range of applications in understanding the role of social networks on health behaviours.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e026997.full
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelisba observationalstudytoassesstheeffectsofsocialnetworksontheseasonalinfluenzavaccineuptakebyearlycareerdoctors
AT thomaskeegan observationalstudytoassesstheeffectsofsocialnetworksontheseasonalinfluenzavaccineuptakebyearlycareerdoctors
AT rhiannonedge observationalstudytoassesstheeffectsofsocialnetworksontheseasonalinfluenzavaccineuptakebyearlycareerdoctors
_version_ 1724208966087475200