Comparative Analysis of 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T Realistic CNTFET Based SRAM

CMOS technology below 10 nm faces fundamental limits which restricts its applicability for future electronic application mainly in terms of size, power consumption, and speed. In digital electronics, memory components play a very significant role. SRAM, due to its unique ability to retain data, is o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shital Joshi, Umar Alabawi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Nanotechnology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4575013
id doaj-c7d646d07d68440494697ca7851c5eb9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7d646d07d68440494697ca7851c5eb92020-11-24T21:27:17ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Nanotechnology1687-95031687-95112017-01-01201710.1155/2017/45750134575013Comparative Analysis of 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T Realistic CNTFET Based SRAMShital Joshi0Umar Alabawi1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USADepartment of Computer Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi ArabiaCMOS technology below 10 nm faces fundamental limits which restricts its applicability for future electronic application mainly in terms of size, power consumption, and speed. In digital electronics, memory components play a very significant role. SRAM, due to its unique ability to retain data, is one of the most popular memory elements used in most of the digital devices. With aggressive technology scaling, the design of SRAM is seriously challenged in terms of delay, noise margin, and stability. This paper compares the performance of various CNTFET based SRAM cell topologies like 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T cell with respect to static noise margin (SNM), write margin (WM), read delay, and power consumption. To consider the nonidealities of CNTFET, variations in tube diameter and effect of metallic tubes are considered for various structures with respect to various performance metrics like SNM, WM, read delay, and power consumption.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4575013
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shital Joshi
Umar Alabawi
spellingShingle Shital Joshi
Umar Alabawi
Comparative Analysis of 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T Realistic CNTFET Based SRAM
Journal of Nanotechnology
author_facet Shital Joshi
Umar Alabawi
author_sort Shital Joshi
title Comparative Analysis of 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T Realistic CNTFET Based SRAM
title_short Comparative Analysis of 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T Realistic CNTFET Based SRAM
title_full Comparative Analysis of 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T Realistic CNTFET Based SRAM
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T Realistic CNTFET Based SRAM
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T Realistic CNTFET Based SRAM
title_sort comparative analysis of 6t, 7t, 8t, 9t, and 10t realistic cntfet based sram
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Nanotechnology
issn 1687-9503
1687-9511
publishDate 2017-01-01
description CMOS technology below 10 nm faces fundamental limits which restricts its applicability for future electronic application mainly in terms of size, power consumption, and speed. In digital electronics, memory components play a very significant role. SRAM, due to its unique ability to retain data, is one of the most popular memory elements used in most of the digital devices. With aggressive technology scaling, the design of SRAM is seriously challenged in terms of delay, noise margin, and stability. This paper compares the performance of various CNTFET based SRAM cell topologies like 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T cell with respect to static noise margin (SNM), write margin (WM), read delay, and power consumption. To consider the nonidealities of CNTFET, variations in tube diameter and effect of metallic tubes are considered for various structures with respect to various performance metrics like SNM, WM, read delay, and power consumption.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4575013
work_keys_str_mv AT shitaljoshi comparativeanalysisof6t7t8t9tand10trealisticcntfetbasedsram
AT umaralabawi comparativeanalysisof6t7t8t9tand10trealisticcntfetbasedsram
_version_ 1725975650085371904