Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 when used in feed for dogs at a minimum dose of 6 × 109 colony...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-01-01
|
Series: | EFSA Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5524 |
id |
doaj-c7d040b50ee644a2a5f98cea4935fd40 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c7d040b50ee644a2a5f98cea4935fd402021-05-02T19:15:05ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322019-01-01171n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5524Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogsEFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)Vasileios BampidisGiovanna AzimontiMaria de Lourdes BastosHenrik ChristensenBirgit DusemundMaryline KoubaMojca Kos DurjavaMarta López‐AlonsoSecundino López PuenteFrancesca MarconBaltasar MayoAlena PechováMariana PetkovaFernando RamosYolanda SanzRoberto Edoardo VillaRuud WoutersenAndrew ChessonPier Sandro CocconcelliRobert John WallaceGuido RychenRosella BrozziMaria SaarelaAbstract Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 when used in feed for dogs at a minimum dose of 6 × 109 colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32203. This species is considered by the European Food Safety Authority to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns from other components of the additive, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 for dogs.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5524zootechnical additivesLactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 32203safetyQPSefficacy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) Vasileios Bampidis Giovanna Azimonti Maria de Lourdes Bastos Henrik Christensen Birgit Dusemund Maryline Kouba Mojca Kos Durjava Marta López‐Alonso Secundino López Puente Francesca Marcon Baltasar Mayo Alena Pechová Mariana Petkova Fernando Ramos Yolanda Sanz Roberto Edoardo Villa Ruud Woutersen Andrew Chesson Pier Sandro Cocconcelli Robert John Wallace Guido Rychen Rosella Brozzi Maria Saarela |
spellingShingle |
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) Vasileios Bampidis Giovanna Azimonti Maria de Lourdes Bastos Henrik Christensen Birgit Dusemund Maryline Kouba Mojca Kos Durjava Marta López‐Alonso Secundino López Puente Francesca Marcon Baltasar Mayo Alena Pechová Mariana Petkova Fernando Ramos Yolanda Sanz Roberto Edoardo Villa Ruud Woutersen Andrew Chesson Pier Sandro Cocconcelli Robert John Wallace Guido Rychen Rosella Brozzi Maria Saarela Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs EFSA Journal zootechnical additives Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 32203 safety QPS efficacy |
author_facet |
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) Vasileios Bampidis Giovanna Azimonti Maria de Lourdes Bastos Henrik Christensen Birgit Dusemund Maryline Kouba Mojca Kos Durjava Marta López‐Alonso Secundino López Puente Francesca Marcon Baltasar Mayo Alena Pechová Mariana Petkova Fernando Ramos Yolanda Sanz Roberto Edoardo Villa Ruud Woutersen Andrew Chesson Pier Sandro Cocconcelli Robert John Wallace Guido Rychen Rosella Brozzi Maria Saarela |
author_sort |
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) |
title |
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs |
title_short |
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs |
title_full |
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs |
title_fullStr |
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs |
title_sort |
safety and efficacy of lactobacillus reuteri nbf‐1 (dsm 32203) as a feed additive for dogs |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
EFSA Journal |
issn |
1831-4732 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 when used in feed for dogs at a minimum dose of 6 × 109 colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32203. This species is considered by the European Food Safety Authority to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns from other components of the additive, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 for dogs. |
topic |
zootechnical additives Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 32203 safety QPS efficacy |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5524 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT efsapanelonadditivesandproductsorsubstancesusedinanimalfeedfeedap safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT vasileiosbampidis safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT giovannaazimonti safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT mariadelourdesbastos safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT henrikchristensen safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT birgitdusemund safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT marylinekouba safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT mojcakosdurjava safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT martalopezalonso safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT secundinolopezpuente safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT francescamarcon safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT baltasarmayo safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT alenapechova safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT marianapetkova safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT fernandoramos safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT yolandasanz safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT robertoedoardovilla safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT ruudwoutersen safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT andrewchesson safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT piersandrococconcelli safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT robertjohnwallace safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT guidorychen safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT rosellabrozzi safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs AT mariasaarela safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs |
_version_ |
1721488566604791808 |