Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs

Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 when used in feed for dogs at a minimum dose of 6 × 109 colony...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), Vasileios Bampidis, Giovanna Azimonti, Maria de Lourdes Bastos, Henrik Christensen, Birgit Dusemund, Maryline Kouba, Mojca Kos Durjava, Marta López‐Alonso, Secundino López Puente, Francesca Marcon, Baltasar Mayo, Alena Pechová, Mariana Petkova, Fernando Ramos, Yolanda Sanz, Roberto Edoardo Villa, Ruud Woutersen, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Robert John Wallace, Guido Rychen, Rosella Brozzi, Maria Saarela
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
QPS
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5524
id doaj-c7d040b50ee644a2a5f98cea4935fd40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7d040b50ee644a2a5f98cea4935fd402021-05-02T19:15:05ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322019-01-01171n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5524Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogsEFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)Vasileios BampidisGiovanna AzimontiMaria de Lourdes BastosHenrik ChristensenBirgit DusemundMaryline KoubaMojca Kos DurjavaMarta López‐AlonsoSecundino López PuenteFrancesca MarconBaltasar MayoAlena PechováMariana PetkovaFernando RamosYolanda SanzRoberto Edoardo VillaRuud WoutersenAndrew ChessonPier Sandro CocconcelliRobert John WallaceGuido RychenRosella BrozziMaria SaarelaAbstract Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 when used in feed for dogs at a minimum dose of 6 × 109 colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32203. This species is considered by the European Food Safety Authority to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns from other components of the additive, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 for dogs.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5524zootechnical additivesLactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 32203safetyQPSefficacy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
Vasileios Bampidis
Giovanna Azimonti
Maria de Lourdes Bastos
Henrik Christensen
Birgit Dusemund
Maryline Kouba
Mojca Kos Durjava
Marta López‐Alonso
Secundino López Puente
Francesca Marcon
Baltasar Mayo
Alena Pechová
Mariana Petkova
Fernando Ramos
Yolanda Sanz
Roberto Edoardo Villa
Ruud Woutersen
Andrew Chesson
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Robert John Wallace
Guido Rychen
Rosella Brozzi
Maria Saarela
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
Vasileios Bampidis
Giovanna Azimonti
Maria de Lourdes Bastos
Henrik Christensen
Birgit Dusemund
Maryline Kouba
Mojca Kos Durjava
Marta López‐Alonso
Secundino López Puente
Francesca Marcon
Baltasar Mayo
Alena Pechová
Mariana Petkova
Fernando Ramos
Yolanda Sanz
Roberto Edoardo Villa
Ruud Woutersen
Andrew Chesson
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Robert John Wallace
Guido Rychen
Rosella Brozzi
Maria Saarela
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
EFSA Journal
zootechnical additives
Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1
Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 32203
safety
QPS
efficacy
author_facet EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
Vasileios Bampidis
Giovanna Azimonti
Maria de Lourdes Bastos
Henrik Christensen
Birgit Dusemund
Maryline Kouba
Mojca Kos Durjava
Marta López‐Alonso
Secundino López Puente
Francesca Marcon
Baltasar Mayo
Alena Pechová
Mariana Petkova
Fernando Ramos
Yolanda Sanz
Roberto Edoardo Villa
Ruud Woutersen
Andrew Chesson
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Robert John Wallace
Guido Rychen
Rosella Brozzi
Maria Saarela
author_sort EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
title Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
title_short Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
title_full Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
title_sort safety and efficacy of lactobacillus reuteri nbf‐1 (dsm 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 when used in feed for dogs at a minimum dose of 6 × 109 colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32203. This species is considered by the European Food Safety Authority to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns from other components of the additive, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 for dogs.
topic zootechnical additives
Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1
Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 32203
safety
QPS
efficacy
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5524
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonadditivesandproductsorsubstancesusedinanimalfeedfeedap safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT vasileiosbampidis safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT giovannaazimonti safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT mariadelourdesbastos safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT henrikchristensen safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT birgitdusemund safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT marylinekouba safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT mojcakosdurjava safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT martalopezalonso safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT secundinolopezpuente safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT francescamarcon safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT baltasarmayo safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT alenapechova safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT marianapetkova safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT fernandoramos safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT yolandasanz safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT robertoedoardovilla safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT ruudwoutersen safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT andrewchesson safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT piersandrococconcelli safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT robertjohnwallace safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT guidorychen safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT rosellabrozzi safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT mariasaarela safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
_version_ 1721488566604791808