Bridging political economy analysis and critical institutionalism: an approach to help analyse institutional change for rural water services

This paper argues that approaches to understanding local institutions for natural resource management based on “critical institutionalism” (Cleaver 2012), which emphasises the importance of improvisation and adaptation across different scales, can be placed within broader political economy analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stephen David Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) 2015-03-01
Series:International Journal of the Commons
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/520
id doaj-c7c6d038983f47f4b5560c9c813ac77f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7c6d038983f47f4b5560c9c813ac77f2020-11-25T03:05:53ZengUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)International Journal of the Commons1875-02812015-03-0191658610.18352/ijc.520240Bridging political economy analysis and critical institutionalism: an approach to help analyse institutional change for rural water servicesStephen David Jones0Currently unaffiliated. Previously Royal Holloway, University of London.This paper argues that approaches to understanding local institutions for natural resource management based on “critical institutionalism” (Cleaver 2012), which emphasises the importance of improvisation and adaptation across different scales, can be placed within broader political economy analysis frameworks for assessing challenges in public services delivery from national to local levels. The paper uses such an extended political economy analysis approach to understand the role of the international NGO WaterAid and its partners in Mali in relation to institutions for financing rural water services, drawing on collaborative research undertaken in 2010 and 2011. The case study shows that WaterAid’s approach can be understood through elements of both mainstream and critical institutionalist thinking. At local government level, WaterAid primarily promotes formal institutional arrangements, which exhibit the challenge of “reforms as signals” (Andrews 2013), where institutional reforms appear to happen but lack the intended function. However, the work of WaterAid’s partners at community level supports processes of “institutional bricolage” through which they try to gradually work with local actors to find ways of ‘best fit’ for financing rural water services which adapt existing local practices into new arrangements.https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/520political economy analysiscritical institutionalismpractical hybridityreforms as signals
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephen David Jones
spellingShingle Stephen David Jones
Bridging political economy analysis and critical institutionalism: an approach to help analyse institutional change for rural water services
International Journal of the Commons
political economy analysis
critical institutionalism
practical hybridity
reforms as signals
author_facet Stephen David Jones
author_sort Stephen David Jones
title Bridging political economy analysis and critical institutionalism: an approach to help analyse institutional change for rural water services
title_short Bridging political economy analysis and critical institutionalism: an approach to help analyse institutional change for rural water services
title_full Bridging political economy analysis and critical institutionalism: an approach to help analyse institutional change for rural water services
title_fullStr Bridging political economy analysis and critical institutionalism: an approach to help analyse institutional change for rural water services
title_full_unstemmed Bridging political economy analysis and critical institutionalism: an approach to help analyse institutional change for rural water services
title_sort bridging political economy analysis and critical institutionalism: an approach to help analyse institutional change for rural water services
publisher Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
series International Journal of the Commons
issn 1875-0281
publishDate 2015-03-01
description This paper argues that approaches to understanding local institutions for natural resource management based on “critical institutionalism” (Cleaver 2012), which emphasises the importance of improvisation and adaptation across different scales, can be placed within broader political economy analysis frameworks for assessing challenges in public services delivery from national to local levels. The paper uses such an extended political economy analysis approach to understand the role of the international NGO WaterAid and its partners in Mali in relation to institutions for financing rural water services, drawing on collaborative research undertaken in 2010 and 2011. The case study shows that WaterAid’s approach can be understood through elements of both mainstream and critical institutionalist thinking. At local government level, WaterAid primarily promotes formal institutional arrangements, which exhibit the challenge of “reforms as signals” (Andrews 2013), where institutional reforms appear to happen but lack the intended function. However, the work of WaterAid’s partners at community level supports processes of “institutional bricolage” through which they try to gradually work with local actors to find ways of ‘best fit’ for financing rural water services which adapt existing local practices into new arrangements.
topic political economy analysis
critical institutionalism
practical hybridity
reforms as signals
url https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/520
work_keys_str_mv AT stephendavidjones bridgingpoliticaleconomyanalysisandcriticalinstitutionalismanapproachtohelpanalyseinstitutionalchangeforruralwaterservices
_version_ 1724676689422712832