An examination of cancer epidemiology studies among populations living close to toxic waste sites

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Toxic waste sites contain a broad range of suspected or confirmed human carcinogens, and remain a source of concern to many people, particularly those living in the vicinity of a site. Despite years of study, a consensus has not emer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cullen Mark R, Borak Jonathan B, Russi Mark B
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-06-01
Series:Environmental Health
Online Access:http://www.ehjournal.net/content/7/1/32
id doaj-c7be4aa9d211458587324e05d92e0dae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7be4aa9d211458587324e05d92e0dae2020-11-24T20:44:15ZengBMCEnvironmental Health1476-069X2008-06-01713210.1186/1476-069X-7-32An examination of cancer epidemiology studies among populations living close to toxic waste sitesCullen Mark RBorak Jonathan BRussi Mark B<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Toxic waste sites contain a broad range of suspected or confirmed human carcinogens, and remain a source of concern to many people, particularly those living in the vicinity of a site. Despite years of study, a consensus has not emerged regarding the cancer risk associated with such sites.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We examined the published, peer-reviewed literature addressing cancer incidence or mortality in the vicinity of toxic waste sites between 1980 and 2006, and catalogued the methods employed by such studies.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Nineteen studies are described with respect to eight methodological criteria. Most were ecological, with minimal utilization of hydrogeological or air pathway modeling. Many did not catalogue whether a potable water supply was contaminated, and very few included contaminant measurements at waste sites or in subjects' homes. Most studies did not appear to be responses to a recognized cancer mortality cluster. Studies were highly variable with respect to handling of competing risk factors and multiple comparisons.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We conclude that studies to date have generated hypotheses, but have been of limited utility in determining whether populations living near toxic waste sites are at increased cancer risk.</p> http://www.ehjournal.net/content/7/1/32
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cullen Mark R
Borak Jonathan B
Russi Mark B
spellingShingle Cullen Mark R
Borak Jonathan B
Russi Mark B
An examination of cancer epidemiology studies among populations living close to toxic waste sites
Environmental Health
author_facet Cullen Mark R
Borak Jonathan B
Russi Mark B
author_sort Cullen Mark R
title An examination of cancer epidemiology studies among populations living close to toxic waste sites
title_short An examination of cancer epidemiology studies among populations living close to toxic waste sites
title_full An examination of cancer epidemiology studies among populations living close to toxic waste sites
title_fullStr An examination of cancer epidemiology studies among populations living close to toxic waste sites
title_full_unstemmed An examination of cancer epidemiology studies among populations living close to toxic waste sites
title_sort examination of cancer epidemiology studies among populations living close to toxic waste sites
publisher BMC
series Environmental Health
issn 1476-069X
publishDate 2008-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Toxic waste sites contain a broad range of suspected or confirmed human carcinogens, and remain a source of concern to many people, particularly those living in the vicinity of a site. Despite years of study, a consensus has not emerged regarding the cancer risk associated with such sites.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We examined the published, peer-reviewed literature addressing cancer incidence or mortality in the vicinity of toxic waste sites between 1980 and 2006, and catalogued the methods employed by such studies.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Nineteen studies are described with respect to eight methodological criteria. Most were ecological, with minimal utilization of hydrogeological or air pathway modeling. Many did not catalogue whether a potable water supply was contaminated, and very few included contaminant measurements at waste sites or in subjects' homes. Most studies did not appear to be responses to a recognized cancer mortality cluster. Studies were highly variable with respect to handling of competing risk factors and multiple comparisons.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We conclude that studies to date have generated hypotheses, but have been of limited utility in determining whether populations living near toxic waste sites are at increased cancer risk.</p>
url http://www.ehjournal.net/content/7/1/32
work_keys_str_mv AT cullenmarkr anexaminationofcancerepidemiologystudiesamongpopulationslivingclosetotoxicwastesites
AT borakjonathanb anexaminationofcancerepidemiologystudiesamongpopulationslivingclosetotoxicwastesites
AT russimarkb anexaminationofcancerepidemiologystudiesamongpopulationslivingclosetotoxicwastesites
AT cullenmarkr examinationofcancerepidemiologystudiesamongpopulationslivingclosetotoxicwastesites
AT borakjonathanb examinationofcancerepidemiologystudiesamongpopulationslivingclosetotoxicwastesites
AT russimarkb examinationofcancerepidemiologystudiesamongpopulationslivingclosetotoxicwastesites
_version_ 1716817990502055936