Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures by Fiber-Optic Sensors

Fiber-optic sensors cannot measure damage; to get information about damage from strain measurements, additional strategies are needed, and several alternatives are available in the existing literature. This paper discusses two independent procedures. The first is based on detecting new strains appea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alfredo Güemes, Antonio Fernández-López, Patricia F. Díaz-Maroto, Angel Lozano, Julian Sierra-Perez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-04-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/4/1094
id doaj-c7b49f291d6645959be14d26465531dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7b49f291d6645959be14d26465531dd2020-11-24T21:15:56ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202018-04-01184109410.3390/s18041094s18041094Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures by Fiber-Optic SensorsAlfredo Güemes0Antonio Fernández-López1Patricia F. Díaz-Maroto2Angel Lozano3Julian Sierra-Perez4Department Aeronautics, Polytechnic University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment Aeronautics, Polytechnic University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment Aeronautics, Polytechnic University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment Aeronautics, Polytechnic University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainIngeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, ColombiaFiber-optic sensors cannot measure damage; to get information about damage from strain measurements, additional strategies are needed, and several alternatives are available in the existing literature. This paper discusses two independent procedures. The first is based on detecting new strains appearing around a damage spot. The structure does not need to be under loads, the technique is very robust, and damage detectability is high, but it requires sensors to be located very close to the damage, so it is a local technique. The second approach offers wider coverage of the structure; it is based on identifying the changes caused by damage on the strain field in the whole structure for similar external loads. Damage location does not need to be known a priori, and detectability is dependent upon the sensor’s network density, the damage size, and the external loads. Examples of application to real structures are given.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/4/1094structural health monitoring (SHM)distributed sensingprincipal component analysis (PCA)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alfredo Güemes
Antonio Fernández-López
Patricia F. Díaz-Maroto
Angel Lozano
Julian Sierra-Perez
spellingShingle Alfredo Güemes
Antonio Fernández-López
Patricia F. Díaz-Maroto
Angel Lozano
Julian Sierra-Perez
Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures by Fiber-Optic Sensors
Sensors
structural health monitoring (SHM)
distributed sensing
principal component analysis (PCA)
author_facet Alfredo Güemes
Antonio Fernández-López
Patricia F. Díaz-Maroto
Angel Lozano
Julian Sierra-Perez
author_sort Alfredo Güemes
title Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures by Fiber-Optic Sensors
title_short Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures by Fiber-Optic Sensors
title_full Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures by Fiber-Optic Sensors
title_fullStr Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures by Fiber-Optic Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures by Fiber-Optic Sensors
title_sort structural health monitoring in composite structures by fiber-optic sensors
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Fiber-optic sensors cannot measure damage; to get information about damage from strain measurements, additional strategies are needed, and several alternatives are available in the existing literature. This paper discusses two independent procedures. The first is based on detecting new strains appearing around a damage spot. The structure does not need to be under loads, the technique is very robust, and damage detectability is high, but it requires sensors to be located very close to the damage, so it is a local technique. The second approach offers wider coverage of the structure; it is based on identifying the changes caused by damage on the strain field in the whole structure for similar external loads. Damage location does not need to be known a priori, and detectability is dependent upon the sensor’s network density, the damage size, and the external loads. Examples of application to real structures are given.
topic structural health monitoring (SHM)
distributed sensing
principal component analysis (PCA)
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/4/1094
work_keys_str_mv AT alfredoguemes structuralhealthmonitoringincompositestructuresbyfiberopticsensors
AT antoniofernandezlopez structuralhealthmonitoringincompositestructuresbyfiberopticsensors
AT patriciafdiazmaroto structuralhealthmonitoringincompositestructuresbyfiberopticsensors
AT angellozano structuralhealthmonitoringincompositestructuresbyfiberopticsensors
AT juliansierraperez structuralhealthmonitoringincompositestructuresbyfiberopticsensors
_version_ 1716744025776586752