Climate versus carbon dioxide controls on biomass burning: a model analysis of the glacial–interglacial contrast
Climate controls fire regimes through its influence on the amount and types of fuel present and their dryness. CO<sub>2</sub> concentration constrains primary production by limiting photosynthetic activity in plants. However, although fuel accumulation depends on biomass production, and...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2014-11-01
|
Series: | Biogeosciences |
Online Access: | http://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6017/2014/bg-11-6017-2014.pdf |
id |
doaj-c7b1a909419e49a8a9852c5c47b4d7d2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c7b1a909419e49a8a9852c5c47b4d7d22020-11-24T20:55:12ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892014-11-0111216017602710.5194/bg-11-6017-2014Climate versus carbon dioxide controls on biomass burning: a model analysis of the glacial–interglacial contrastM. Martin Calvo0I. C. Prentice1S. P. Harrison2Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot SL5 7PY, UKAXA Chair of Biosphere and Climate Impacts, Grand Challenges in Ecosystems and the Environment and Grantham Institute – Climate Change and Environment, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot SL5 7PY, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, AustraliaClimate controls fire regimes through its influence on the amount and types of fuel present and their dryness. CO<sub>2</sub> concentration constrains primary production by limiting photosynthetic activity in plants. However, although fuel accumulation depends on biomass production, and hence on CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, the quantitative relationship between atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and biomass burning is not well understood. Here a fire-enabled dynamic global vegetation model (the Land surface Processes and eXchanges model, LPX) is used to attribute glacial–interglacial changes in biomass burning to an increase in CO<sub>2</sub>, which would be expected to increase primary production and therefore fuel loads even in the absence of climate change, vs. climate change effects. Four general circulation models provided last glacial maximum (LGM) climate anomalies – that is, differences from the pre-industrial (PI) control climate – from the Palaeoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project Phase~2, allowing the construction of four scenarios for LGM climate. Modelled carbon fluxes from biomass burning were corrected for the model's observed prediction biases in contemporary regional average values for biomes. With LGM climate and low CO<sub>2</sub> (185 ppm) effects included, the modelled global flux at the LGM was in the range of 1.0–1.4 Pg C year<sup>-1</sup>, about a third less than that modelled for PI time. LGM climate with pre-industrial CO<sub>2</sub> (280 ppm) yielded unrealistic results, with global biomass burning fluxes similar to or even greater than in the pre-industrial climate. It is inferred that a substantial part of the increase in biomass burning after the LGM must be attributed to the effect of increasing CO<sub>2</sub> concentration on primary production and fuel load. Today, by analogy, both rising CO<sub>2</sub> and global warming must be considered as risk factors for increasing biomass burning. Both effects need to be included in models to project future fire risks.http://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6017/2014/bg-11-6017-2014.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Martin Calvo I. C. Prentice S. P. Harrison |
spellingShingle |
M. Martin Calvo I. C. Prentice S. P. Harrison Climate versus carbon dioxide controls on biomass burning: a model analysis of the glacial–interglacial contrast Biogeosciences |
author_facet |
M. Martin Calvo I. C. Prentice S. P. Harrison |
author_sort |
M. Martin Calvo |
title |
Climate versus carbon dioxide controls on biomass burning: a model analysis of the glacial–interglacial contrast |
title_short |
Climate versus carbon dioxide controls on biomass burning: a model analysis of the glacial–interglacial contrast |
title_full |
Climate versus carbon dioxide controls on biomass burning: a model analysis of the glacial–interglacial contrast |
title_fullStr |
Climate versus carbon dioxide controls on biomass burning: a model analysis of the glacial–interglacial contrast |
title_full_unstemmed |
Climate versus carbon dioxide controls on biomass burning: a model analysis of the glacial–interglacial contrast |
title_sort |
climate versus carbon dioxide controls on biomass burning: a model analysis of the glacial–interglacial contrast |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Biogeosciences |
issn |
1726-4170 1726-4189 |
publishDate |
2014-11-01 |
description |
Climate controls fire regimes through its influence on the amount and types
of fuel present and their dryness. CO<sub>2</sub> concentration constrains
primary production by limiting photosynthetic activity in plants. However,
although fuel accumulation depends on biomass production, and hence on
CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, the quantitative relationship between atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and biomass burning is not well understood. Here a
fire-enabled dynamic global vegetation model (the Land surface Processes and
eXchanges model, LPX) is used to attribute glacial–interglacial changes in
biomass burning to an increase in CO<sub>2</sub>, which would be expected to
increase primary production and therefore fuel loads even in the absence of
climate change, vs. climate change effects. Four general circulation models
provided last glacial maximum (LGM) climate anomalies – that is, differences
from the pre-industrial (PI) control climate – from the Palaeoclimate
Modelling Intercomparison Project Phase~2, allowing the construction of four
scenarios for LGM climate. Modelled carbon fluxes from biomass burning were
corrected for the model's observed prediction biases in contemporary regional
average values for biomes. With LGM climate and low CO<sub>2</sub>
(185 ppm) effects included, the modelled global flux at the LGM was
in the range of 1.0–1.4 Pg C year<sup>-1</sup>, about a third less than
that modelled for PI time. LGM climate with pre-industrial CO<sub>2</sub>
(280 ppm) yielded unrealistic results, with global biomass burning
fluxes similar to or even greater than in the pre-industrial climate. It is
inferred that a substantial part of the increase in biomass burning after the
LGM must be attributed to the effect of increasing CO<sub>2</sub> concentration
on primary production and fuel load. Today, by analogy, both rising
CO<sub>2</sub> and global warming must be considered as risk factors for
increasing biomass burning. Both effects need to be included in models to
project future fire risks. |
url |
http://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6017/2014/bg-11-6017-2014.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mmartincalvo climateversuscarbondioxidecontrolsonbiomassburningamodelanalysisoftheglacialinterglacialcontrast AT icprentice climateversuscarbondioxidecontrolsonbiomassburningamodelanalysisoftheglacialinterglacialcontrast AT spharrison climateversuscarbondioxidecontrolsonbiomassburningamodelanalysisoftheglacialinterglacialcontrast |
_version_ |
1716792203965104128 |